Peer-Reviewed Study Confirms Fatal Flaw in PCR Testing: 42% False Discovery Rate for SARS-CoV-2 nonQ-RT-PCR Test. This means COV...
All COVID-19 Vaccine Studies Used nonQ-RT-PCR to determine case status. All of the estimates of outcome are unreliable. This is the most important study we will ever likely publish in our journal.
Glad to see confirmation of what we all knew from the beginning. Its a good time to remember Kary Mullis inventor of PCR, who clearly said it was not to be used for diagnosis. Oh, he died just a few weeks before the Plandemic.
And when I explained all this to my "smart friends" I became the asshole Nevermind me working in the molecular diagnostics field and having knowledge of many different types of molecular testing - enough to educate PhD researchers...
Any lab tech with 8months of schooling at a junior college would know this!
So glad we finally have permission to discuss- FUCK YOUR AMNESTY
Oh yeah-- WHERE IS 1 CULTURE CONFIRMATION????
Not 1 fucking viral culture was done do confirm pcr positivity- NOT ONE!!
Yep. The truth is the science was never on their side. The media was, though, and that's all they needed.
The media keeps turning up on the wrong side of everything. Everything.
But....believe the science.....? KEK
This has been well known. A 98 percent false rate when run at 40 cycles. Someone close to me is a medical scientist. They've been explaining this. Basically 100npercemt of the tested were false positive. Not one confrrmed case was made because of pcr.
Anything over 20 cycles was nothing, and they often ran it to 40-45. They were looking for positive results, not sickness. It was the only way to drum up enough fear to have the vax not only accepted but begged for. Forget the fact that most people who tested positive felt fine and were fine. They didn't care that they felt fine. They got scared enough to want a fix. What a sick world we live in.
Many European countries were fining people for not taking the poison. The people refusing the poison had to burn a hole in their wallets to keep paying for the 'tests" until they turned up negative just to have access to basics.
The plandemic participants and schemers involved truly are despicable.
And even with a positive reading the test still couldn't differentiate between an active fragment of virus or a dead fragment (non contagious).
Hillary has entered the chat: "I don't remember arranging that one. I'll have to check my spreadsheet."
Anything over 5% is considered invalid. 42% is a crime of epic proportions.
I guarantee you that 42% is low. That PCR test couldn't tell the difference between the cold, flu and COVID. MOST positive results, even among actually sick people, was something other than COVID. Then you throw in the fact they ran it up to 45 cycles, making damn near everyone test positive for SOMETHING. There is no way in hell 58% of positive COVID results were COVID. A damn large chunk had to be the flu, because where else does the flu fit in all of this? It couldn't have just taken a few years off. It's still there, and the PCR test picked that up. They just called it COVID.
42% must be Dominion numbers....
Keep in mind that when you turn the cycles up to 45 that means they will find inactive viral components as well making nearly everyone test "positive".
Anyone that has been injected with vaccines from child hood will have some presence of viral components in their system.
Exactly. They knew full well that there was nothing being found at 45 cycles that would ever amount to anything. All they wanted was that positive result.
Then throw in the fact that each time they tested positive, they counted it as another COVID case. Just sick, and I don't mean the people testing positive.
Enter the conversation of SENSITIVITY versus SPECIFICITY Basic in molecular world
The PCR 'tests' are 0% correct. CONvid was renamed flu for a couple of years, combined with death from anything and everything put down as it in death certificates. The elderly were systematically MURDERED.
Even if COVID is real, it is NOT what most people tested positive for. It was almost entirely the flu, or completely the flu. There was never a massive breakout of COVID, just a manipulation of the flu numbers using a faulty test that said everything was COVID. I swear, why didn't one person ask the simple question, "If this test was invented before COVID, what else could it pick up?" I mean seriously, no one invented a test to pick up something that didn't exist yet. So, what did the PCR test pick up BEFORE COVID? The flu? Hmmm, now let's look at flu numbers. Oh, there are none? That's weird, I wonder where they went?
Bottom line is this. The PCR test is like slapping a "COVID-19" sticker on the damn thing and saying it only picks up COVID results. That's like putting a damn COVID-19 sticker on a broom and calling all the dust particles on the broom COVID. It's freaking insanity.
⬆️ x1000
I knew about the PCR Kary Mullis video early on, and couldn't (can't) get my head round why people wouldn't believe it from the horses' mouth of the fucking INVENTOR of it.
Mockingbird Media is strong
Excellent review!
Those crazy conspiracy theorists proven right again.
Excellent.
I don't know whether to feel vindicated or depressed. This means everything else studied about covid has to be rethought, two years of intense research down the drain.
You assume they were actually researching COVID? They spent more time researching how to get people to believe it than they did researching an actual infectious disease.
There is a ton of research on covid, but the implication of this article is bigger. If the test for it is worthless, which we knew, then not only were a great many people misdiagnosed, which we also knew, but since this means we can't really say who was sick with what, we also don't really know what treatments were how effective. I think we can be pretty sure Remdesvir is worthless. However, the depressing part is that it actually supports the CDC-FDA argument that controlled trials of ivermectin, for instance, were not done for covid.
Crimes against humanity.
Covid 19 is a big fake . It was never even real. My guess is the real virus was destroyed and the cabal couldnt let this play go. So just use fake test to call every other illness covid and drum up the media scare.
Except when you have snake venom artificial or otherwise “coursing through your veins” per Dr. Ardis
Peer reviewed study? Us Patriots already knew the PCR test was a bs test as even stated by the CDC. Why is this even posted?