All this is, is dehumanization garbage that achieves nothing other than division. Not only is it untrue, but even if it were true, it benefits us preciously zero to acknowledge and is in fact a detriment to winning people back to reason.
I think ArtemisY was taking some hyperbolic licence with the “no longer technically human” part. The “artificially altering DNA” part, though, is very much still on the table.
DNA has been shown to be modified by Pfizer jabs in vitro in the now famous Swedish study.
Sure, Reuters debunked it. Nothing to do with the ex-Reuters CEO Jamie Dimon being on the Pfizer board, I’m sure, and various other nefarious connections.
Such as when the BioNTech CEO admitted on camera he hadn’t taken the jab yet, Reuters still torturously fact checked this to the point of blatant lies.
“According to Reuters fact checkers, Dr. Sahin of BioNTech did not admit that he is unjabbed. That’s right. Despite the fact you heard him say exactly that with your own ears, Reuters is claiming that you are wrong, and Sahin himself is wrong, and the BioNTech CEO is vaccinated with his own product, the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine. As per usual, the Reuters fact checking team provides precisely zero evidence to back up their wild claims. Despite this, Facebook and other social media platforms will not allow anybody to contradict what Reuters are saying about Sahin’s vaccination status.”
Common sense. What does it mean to be human. Are people born retarded not human? Are people born outside the “average” or “normal” not human? What stupidity.
Our DNA was altered by the invaders ..clearly talked about in the Bible...a record of the fallen angels...aka elohim...translation..from the heavens...other planets ....
There is scientific evidence our DNA was altered. Also crops too...
Monsanto seem to successfully argue that golden corn is their property. Which would seem to suggest that there is a legal precedent that if you modify the DNA of a naturally occuring organism that it becomes your property. Ergo humans who got the beastly clotshots have had their DNA altered so you could argue that they are not humans they are property now. You know if it is evil enough that some of the corporations are going to try to claim it!
I get what you're saying here but God absolutely has his limits. Those who willingly take the mark are lost forever and while I don't think this specific instance was the mark of the beast, all of these people willingly took an experimental injection that may have altered their bodies in ways we don't fully understand just so they could buy and sell and engage in commerce. If this was a trial run for the mark they all failed miserably.
This is not true dammit!! People were told it was a vaccine...one of many they had been having since they were born...the only thing that could save them.
They were also told it was an experimental gene therapy, but they chose to believe the people who said that that was a conspiracy theory and to dismiss it.
I think the point is that they are no longer LEGALLY fully human. Of course they are still human.
I don't know if that means that legally someone not "human" can sue for damages. Or if the damages can be greatly reduced.
This isn't even the worse of it. The survivors are being genetically altered. They are no longer human.
“No longer human” … That is just false.
If their DNA has been artificially altered, they are no longer technically human. It is a simple, scientific observation.
I see what you did there. Very nice.
No it isn't. This isn't how being Human works.
All this is, is dehumanization garbage that achieves nothing other than division. Not only is it untrue, but even if it were true, it benefits us preciously zero to acknowledge and is in fact a detriment to winning people back to reason.
I think ArtemisY was taking some hyperbolic licence with the “no longer technically human” part. The “artificially altering DNA” part, though, is very much still on the table.
DNA has been shown to be modified by Pfizer jabs in vitro in the now famous Swedish study.
https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73
Sure, Reuters debunked it. Nothing to do with the ex-Reuters CEO Jamie Dimon being on the Pfizer board, I’m sure, and various other nefarious connections.
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-pfizer-dna-idUSL2N2VQ2OU
Such as when the BioNTech CEO admitted on camera he hadn’t taken the jab yet, Reuters still torturously fact checked this to the point of blatant lies.
“According to Reuters fact checkers, Dr. Sahin of BioNTech did not admit that he is unjabbed. That’s right. Despite the fact you heard him say exactly that with your own ears, Reuters is claiming that you are wrong, and Sahin himself is wrong, and the BioNTech CEO is vaccinated with his own product, the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine. As per usual, the Reuters fact checking team provides precisely zero evidence to back up their wild claims. Despite this, Facebook and other social media platforms will not allow anybody to contradict what Reuters are saying about Sahin’s vaccination status.”
https://open.substack.com/pub/lionessofjudah/p/safe-and-effective-man-who-invented?r=pezuu&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
Even mainstream normie rag Spectator is touting DNA damage as a possible outcome from the Pfizer jabs on account of the weird shit in them.
https://www.spectator.com.au/2022/11/wots-in-the-shots/
So the truth is only ok when it makes us feel good? Sounds like a perfect example of libtard logic to me…
Common sense. What does it mean to be human. Are people born retarded not human? Are people born outside the “average” or “normal” not human? What stupidity.
Homo Vaxiens?
Our DNA was altered by the invaders ..clearly talked about in the Bible...a record of the fallen angels...aka elohim...translation..from the heavens...other planets ....
There is scientific evidence our DNA was altered. Also crops too...
Since cancer is the replication of damaged DNA (iirc) then technically anyone with Cancer is no longer human?
That doesn't sound right. There must be a better definition.
GMO Human
Monsanto seem to successfully argue that golden corn is their property. Which would seem to suggest that there is a legal precedent that if you modify the DNA of a naturally occuring organism that it becomes your property. Ergo humans who got the beastly clotshots have had their DNA altered so you could argue that they are not humans they are property now. You know if it is evil enough that some of the corporations are going to try to claim it!
Good they can come pick their corn our of our turds.
No weapon formed against the shall prosper.
Amen
I get what you're saying here but God absolutely has his limits. Those who willingly take the mark are lost forever and while I don't think this specific instance was the mark of the beast, all of these people willingly took an experimental injection that may have altered their bodies in ways we don't fully understand just so they could buy and sell and engage in commerce. If this was a trial run for the mark they all failed miserably.
God has no limits.
"God absolutely has limits"
Yup, he is limited to YOUR believing.
So if you say He can't help you you are right. You are also right if you say he can.
"but if you believe, ALL things are possible to he that believes."
You gotta believe God's promises to receive them. You reject them out right so for you they will not come to pass.
Recommedation, study the Word sp you can build your believing. Il tell you right now God CAN and will do everything He promises IF you believe.
This is not true dammit!! People were told it was a vaccine...one of many they had been having since they were born...the only thing that could save them.
They were also told it was an experimental gene therapy, but they chose to believe the people who said that that was a conspiracy theory and to dismiss it.
I think the point is that they are no longer LEGALLY fully human. Of course they are still human. I don't know if that means that legally someone not "human" can sue for damages. Or if the damages can be greatly reduced.