And suddenly demoncrats and leftists care about the CONSTITUTION!
Nice move in 5D-Chess!
(twitter.com)
🧠 STABLE GENIUS 🧠
Comments (53)
sorted by:
Trump never said "Terminate the Constitution". Another misinformation quote by the left and RINO's. Trump is actually referring to a July 4th 1776 solution... This current government has already Terminated the Constitution and now we seek to restore it
"Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--"
"IT. IS. THEIR. DUTY."
We are 'required' to act as American citizens....
Hear! Hear!!
Man I love these words.
Beautiful. Seems to me what he was saying is simply, fraud vitiates all.
I can't find where he talked about that. Can you show the source so people can read what Trump really said?
It's on Trumps Truth Social. I found it easy. Here's that part, exactly, copied straight from his post:
A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution. Our great 'Founders' did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections
End quote.
Look how he's gradually ramping up the forcefulness.
Genius
Yes. He's easing them into what is coming.
Does this matter?
The fact is that our Constitution is our founding document.
It takes an amendment consented to by the people to repeal, add, or change any portion of it. It cannot change without the people participating in the change.
Yes, you exactly get it:
Now more people demand that the constitution is upheld. Before they were propogating that this "document" doesn't reflect modern life.
Perhaps this "shift of mainstream demand pro constitution" is important for upcoming decisions of the Supreme Court?
I seem to recall that our Constitution describes 3 branches of government, not four.
I kinda remember Sundance describing a fourth.
Yes, exactly!
But how is the CONSENT of WeThePeople formed? Even when it is not described in the Constitution?
It starts with awareness and assessment of truth, imho. Following that is personalization and growth of understanding. Then overt purposeful acts of commitment and consent.
Something something "We hold these truths to be self evident..."
Yes, this is the ideal.
And now back to reality ...
Reality=Through corrupted and rigged elections we have enemy combatant’s who have been appointed to positions of authority throughout every branch of government, federal state and local, who represent and act in the interests of foreign entities over the will and best interest of their constituents and local populace. They act above law and there is no accountability period. The republic has fallen and despotism prevails. The legislative process will not restore our republic, forced removal is the only way a tyrant gives up their power. The constitution doesn’t mean jack and shit at this point and to debate how we restore our republic through the constitution is absurd. Addressing Treason is the first stone of restoration. How is this accomplished is the question?
I say combatants because through the collusion of coercion and propaganda they have participated in committing genocide from this vaccine. They have murdered our family members and neighbors and have drawn first blood. We are at war.
You so cute... You still believe we the people have any say in how this country is run. We need to face facts, We are living in a tyranny and the big guy is just a crash dummy for the real controllers.
What a nice way to rebuke me for my firm belief in what is intended (in-tended) from the beginning, the establishment of MY country.
Thank you for that.
we_let_this_happen is being obnoxious. I reported him or her to Mom.
Kek.
I refuse to sit here and believe we are powerless… the story of David and Goliath comes to mind
My daughter gave me that one about 10 yrs ago. My how things have changed.
No it is not a FOUNDING document in the same sense as The Declaration of Independence or Bill of Rights or the Articles of Confederation.
The Constitution is a replacement for the Articles of Confederation. Further the current name of the document is different from the original one.
The question then becomes: under what contract are you c.q under what contract do you want to be.
I think given the international "bankruptcies" of several U.S.A. Inc versions, meaning, restructurings, it is fair to say a new constituting of the USA is required.
With is in mind, it is interesting to contemplate the digitization push on the wings of your Social Security. This, in my view, pushes everyone into a different kind of contract, which, just like apple, google, and any online business does, is rather unilateral without "real" contracting going on. Before you know it, your will be sucked into a new trust-type arrangement where you are the trustee, and thus bearing the brunt of the fulfillment of their wishes while they are the executors and beneficiaries.
I would recommend everybody to review 2 items of daily use: computer devices and government services.
First step would be to get the computer devices under your control. This puts linux and FOSS/GPL to the forefront, the same as with LineageOS+dGoogled.
Second step would be to divorce yourself from the UCC-contract-system and learn howto resume your station as a sovereign.
Bill of Rights is PART OF the Constitution.
The Constitution is most definately ONE OF the "founding documents." Today, it is the #1 most important because IT IS THE LAW OF THE LAND, and not the other founding documents.
In law, the title is IRRELEVANT.
The "Bank Secrecy Act," for example, has a good-sounding title, but the title HAS NO LEGAL EFFECT. The actual words within are what matters, and those words are actually anti-secrecy in banking.
FUCK. NO.
That is the WORST idea anyone could come up with. Reality is that Soros and those types would get [their people] writing it, and it would DESTROY your rights.
We need to uphold the Constitution. Period.
If you really think that is a good way to go, then tell us your successes and how you did it.
Yes. The argument is not whether or not it is incorporated at a later time into the Constitution, or whether it is " the law of the land" or not, but whether the Constitution is of the same type of founding document. As I showed you, when you change the name, you change the contract. And in terms of time, 1776 vs 1791 is quite a stretch a time.
It is quite clear your emotion is strong.
Only if your owe allegiance to, or wish to owe allegiance to it. But it is basically besides the point. The point is: That contract is not in operation. Or have you forgotten that even a State of Texas did not have standing? Why is that? Think and leave your emotion for another issue.
Reconstitution is from the ground up. I did not say: rewrite the constitution. Reconstitution is geared towards to the STATE of the compact that SHOULD have been there to bring it into being once again. People -> County -> States -> Federal.
Apart from breaking the compact/ contract, There are other ways to make it void. By contract. The nucleus of this particular issue is not addressed in your response.
Now why would I waste pearls before swines? Or do you think of me as one of those who float balloons, instead of walking the walk according to the talk? Irrespective of that, I am free, you are not. Study and go for it.
Pro tip: A writer's opinion of his readers tells us all we need to know about whether to take him seriously. That decision couldn't have been made any easier, thanks
Cherry picking at best. How about context? But do not strain your brain, please. It all comes down to logical fallacies, anyway.
Right, we know you think we're stupid "swines" [sic], got it
Like I said, you're making it ridiculously easy to know whether you need to be taken seriously. Careful ya don't fall off that high horse and conk that huge noggin, skipper! LOL
Lol. .... says the guy on the high horse.
It seems you do translate pearls before swine as "stupid" but it is not. A little study of the origins of this proverb and the context thereof would go a long way.
That said, you still are still, instead of addressing the subject matter, merely what you are capable of appreciating, which results in an "ad hominem" = logical fallacy.
Your comments noted.
I don't like my SSN. Trying to minimize use of it.
It cannot change without certain politicians participating in the change
FTFY :)
To the politicians, the people be damned. To them, we the People, the patriots of this nation, are the enemy.
That's why they constantly ignore our insistent urgent pleas for justice and the rule of law, letting in millions of foreign criminals to hurt and kill us;
why they release deadly pathogens and then lock us up, to hurt and kill us;
and why they so keenly, desperately want to disarm us, so they can....hurt and kill us
Agreed 💯🎯. What a crazy psyop this is! I keep thinking about Mark Twain’s quote that goes something like …”people would rather be fooled than to be the fool”.
It's easier to fool people than to convince them they've been fooled.
Boy is that the truth.
I likened it (the claim) to Adam Schiff and his version of the Trump Zelensky "perfect" phone call.
Indeed, I saw it as both a recollection and bait. Excellent bait if someone wants to do the GIF.
u/#excellentbait
Finally someone gets it - Thank you BQonita!!!
The Constitution clearly states a very limited role for the federal government, and the 10th amendment makes it clear it should have no other role. We have a totally illegal federal government right now. What we need to bother the new Congress about is the budget -- shutting down all the illegal parts by not funding them.
The Left know as much about the Constitution as they do guns or how to define a woman.
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/amdt11-2/ALDE_00013676/
Not sure why anyone is listening to the padantic pearl-clutching of Swalwell...
https://twitter.com/ultramagaBrian/status/1599339115106869249
https://twitter.com/pi_mij/status/1599338890136981504
https://twitter.com/search?q=constitution&src=typed_query&f=live
AND ESPECIALLY THIS ...
https://twitter.com/recproc1ty/status/1599338018468696064
https://twitter.com/johnnajera13/status/1599337231570771969
Trumps EXACT quote, for those who care. Notice he didn't say "terminate the Constitution ". What he is saying is terminate rules, etc that may BE IN the Constitution. Not the Constitution itself. Here's the statement:
A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution. Our great 'Founders' did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections
And they still twist what was said.
Though I wouldn't put it past them to actually misinterpret it legitimately considering they're easily led automatons.
They don't get it
The constitution is the only reason they are alive.
And they did not respect it.
We are acknowledging that fact.
Kinda like the electoral college and the filibuster.
This is asinine. Trump said:
"A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution. Our great “Founders” did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!"
which means that ALLOWING the fraud effectively allows the termination of our country's laws!!!
HOW THE HELL is that CALLING for termination of the Constitution.
THEY ARE MORONS.
It's amazing that this fucking douchebag can still tweet and show himself in public. Absolutely no shame.
If your point is that Democrats are hypocrites I think we all know that.