Thanks. Had never heard this term. I will remember it.
The biggest issue though is not just asking for evidence, but asking for evidence only from a source THEY approve of. The real problem is you can't even begin a dialog. There is no factual canon, acceptable to both parties, that would allow a logical discussion to take place.
They want to quote statistics from the CDC and radical left university studies, and I want to discuss evidence from sources they consider "debunked." Neither one of us believes the evidence of the other, so what is the point of the discussion?
Because nothing scares the left more than having to politely explain and debate their positions. Much better to just throw punches and scream "NAZI" at everyone you disagree with.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
Thanks. Had never heard this term. I will remember it.
The biggest issue though is not just asking for evidence, but asking for evidence only from a source THEY approve of. The real problem is you can't even begin a dialog. There is no factual canon, acceptable to both parties, that would allow a logical discussion to take place.
They want to quote statistics from the CDC and radical left university studies, and I want to discuss evidence from sources they consider "debunked." Neither one of us believes the evidence of the other, so what is the point of the discussion?
I wonder if Reddit has a term for that.
Let me take a guess - "redditing"
Irreconcilable differences
It's a reference to this comic http://wondermark.com/1k62/
Because nothing scares the left more than having to politely explain and debate their positions. Much better to just throw punches and scream "NAZI" at everyone you disagree with.
good cartoon
This comic made my DAY lmfaoooooo
Wow they really do project on everything. Its that “bad faith arguing” one that got me laughing.
I always love watching the left try to use the term "gaslighting" when it's something they do every fucking day.
They attempt to gaslight people into believing that everyone else is gaslighting instead which is in itself gaslighting.
For someone who remembers GamerGate back in 2014, sealioning was used pretty often. Not new to me, but for many here may be new to them.
just too funny they are an embarrassment to mankind.
🚀 https://c.tenor.com/bnK8AbXH7k8AAAAC/fascinating-mr-spock.gif
Sealioning.
I learned this six months ago. Right here. Mods identified and decoupled the infiltration.
Plenty of it on here.
Can you point to any specific examples?
Stop sealioning you walrus!!
Do you have a source on that?
Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
LOL!
Reddit is ccp controlled & dead in the water.