Take this with a HUGE pinch of salt. But indeed interesting point ...
(media.greatawakening.win)
💊 RAW UNCUT HOPIUM 💊
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (98)
sorted by:
We’ll see what happens today with the Brunson case and the Speaker votes.
Sure seems like interesting timing for the Supreme Court to schedule Jan 6 as the date to decide if they’re accepting the case (who knows, maybe they already did in secret for National Security reasons).
It can also seem like the group of 20 is stalling the selection of the Speaker for some reason.
Brunson case is DOA. This system is too corrupt to be fixed in SCOTUS.
The 20 will get their concessions will vote in dipshit McCarthy.
This isn’t dooming, this is putting the glasses on and seeing reality.
Could democrats vote for McCarthy to get him the votes he needs? I don't know if that's allowed but since he wallows in the same shit pool with the Dems, he's "one of them."
Lots of us believe this is why Trump backed MxCarthy, so the Dems wouldn't consider crossing party lines. Optics, stalemates, the people crying out, and I'm loving every minute of it.
How dirty would a dem feel for voting for a Trump "endorsed" pick?
Another thread on here (stickied as of now) has Roger Stone explaining this move as follows: Dems could vote "present", in effect abstaining. This would lower the threshold of 218 to something less, giving McCave-in the votes.
However, Roger thinks this is unlikely because once Dems started doing this, other R's would see that a deal was made w/Dems and would not vote for McCave, so it would be interesting to see if he would go that far.
I think it could happen because the DS Cabal can team up to get him in... they already proved they don't care about our opinions. Hannity and that (traitorous) crowd would just continue to demonize the 20 patriots and gloss over the D/R uniparty move. IMHO
Of course it’s allowed, it’s a floor election in which every congressperson votes - but the Democrats have been voting as a bloc for Jeffries so the only thing that’s mattered so far is the divided Republican vote.
But in practice there is no way that any of them will flip to McCarthy. There is exactly one thing that the Democrats and the rebels agree about - and that is Kevin McCarthy’s unsuitability for the job.
Less unlikely is that a half-dozen Republicans will cross the aisle to support a Democrat - Jeffries would step aside for that.
Your trio of downvoters should at the very least read this -
https://www.uncoverdc.com/2022/12/30/the-truth-about-the-brunson-case/
I don't disagree. We'll see what happens today. As usual, I'm not getting my hopes up.
like like maybe it's something they planed out beforehand? Like maybe that's why Q didn't bother to correct all of the elections - just the few it did?
I hope anons will not be too hard hit by the disappointment they've set themselves up for, when Trump is not elected Speaker (which he doesn't even want), and the Supreme Court does nothing whatsoever about the stolen 2020 election.