It is. I had the privilege to work with an Army Major (West Point grad) in Bagram, Afghanistan who earned his PhD in mathematics. His thesis was based on microminiurization (sp?) of drones. Particularly the flight motion of dragon fly wings and adaptable light weight materials to replicate as drones at a micro scale. Apparently his thesis worked and earned him his Doctorate... so yes, the technology and theories arei there
It sure seems that way. These people are selling everyone out, even their own families. These monsters will care less when their grandkid says, “My grandfather was general whoever!”, the response will be the same,” Get on the bus!”.
Cool, now we get to work on antidrone tech to eliminate and thwart these guys. They will have spent millions on this stuff and we can defeat them by building cheap broadband noise generators to disrupt their receive capabilities, masks to wear over you face to change your facial profile, nets to keep them out of areas and chaff in long strings to tangle up their rotors. In the meantime, I recommend ballistic helmets and a flyswatter 😁
I almost forgot, laser emitters to blind their cameras.
I'm sure it can and will be done. There are highly directed antennas that can focus RF EM energy, but their effectiveness is limited because of a lack of initial power.
There was a video posted a couple days ago from one of the military services twitter feeds that shows a mini drone attack and the drones as one falling from the sky.
I would assume the drone hunts you down based on your phone's connectivity/gps and facial recognition. So in this case, the best anti drone tech is very possibly not to use a phone and wearing glasses that are rimmed with infrared blocking lens and reflective lens.
If we get to the point where they are deploying these, it is definitely a time to disconnect from unencrypted and registered electronic devices. Any items in your household and vehicles will need to be disconnected from wireless tech, especially automobiles with cellular and wifi tech. EMP pulse generation would be great, but that takes a significantly large amount of energy to create, so not as easy a proposition.
On the Daily Mail website today there was a video taken from a drone showing a small bomb being dropped from the drone directly onto the top of a Russian tank. Some serious damage was done.
‘You could make a swarm of assassin drones for very little money. By just taking the face I.D. chip that’s used in cell phones, and having a small explosive charge and a standard drone, and just have it do a grid sweep of the building until they find the person they’re looking for, ram into them and explode. You could do that right now... No new technology is needed.’
Everything in this presentation (maybe except the 3 grams of explosives) are available for me as a civil customer as we speak.
You don’t see this as a possibility? Replace the explosives with some sort of chemical or biological weapon, and you won’t sacrifice the drone either.
This shirt is highly plausible in the near future.
Or as Elon Musk said in an interview recently:
‘You could make a swarm of assassin drones for very little money. By just taking the face I.D. chip that’s used in cell phones, and having a small explosive charge and a standard drone, and just have it do a grid sweep of the building until they find the person they’re looking for, ram into them and explode. You could do that right now... No new technology is needed.’
The difference for me is that OP posted this (and the Twitter OP) as if the video was real. It makes us look stupid to believe a theatrical preformance as legitimate.
It's like posting scenes from Black Mirror and saying "GUYS LOOK! WHAT IS THIS WORLD COMING TO?!"
Is Black Mirror scary? Yeah, because the technology and concepts within black mirror are indeed not far from reality.. Fuck, some were inspired by reality and currently exist. Should we be posting TV show footage and claiming its real footage? No, we really really shouldn't be... Post the real thing or don't. But don't misrepresent reality.
I’ve seen this before, “proof” that they copy/pasted people in an audience for a speech. That speech was from some random chick flick.
Totally agree, claiming tv/movie productions to be real will only hurt your argument, especially if it’s the tech you’re after; “murderdrones are possible, and here how they might work”, or “here is how they can make a small audience look large, did you notice?”.
Using clips from “Hollywood” to prove a point can be very useful, but make sure to clearly state that it’s for “dramatic effect” only.
Agreed :) sorry if I came across like an asshole, I'm really not in real life.
I think you hit the nail on the head with how it ought to be handled. Being up front about the source and using it to illustrate what is possible is good. Some people need a visual to fully understand it, but be truthful about the source of the demonstration.
We do have explosive drones that we launch from F-15s. They are much larger than these though.
Thank you
It is. I had the privilege to work with an Army Major (West Point grad) in Bagram, Afghanistan who earned his PhD in mathematics. His thesis was based on microminiurization (sp?) of drones. Particularly the flight motion of dragon fly wings and adaptable light weight materials to replicate as drones at a micro scale. Apparently his thesis worked and earned him his Doctorate... so yes, the technology and theories arei there
Slaughter Bots
I'm beginning to think that this military industrial complex is there to eliminate the people and not the militaries involved in the conflicts
It sure seems that way. These people are selling everyone out, even their own families. These monsters will care less when their grandkid says, “My grandfather was general whoever!”, the response will be the same,” Get on the bus!”.
Doesn't need to be explosives. Just a shot of fentanyl to the nostrils and you're done-zo. That way they don't have to sacrifice the drones.
remember the Time cartoon, Smart Bomb, knocking on a door in Iraq :
"Hello, Can I please speak to Saadam Hussein?"
Yes I do.
Cool, now we get to work on antidrone tech to eliminate and thwart these guys. They will have spent millions on this stuff and we can defeat them by building cheap broadband noise generators to disrupt their receive capabilities, masks to wear over you face to change your facial profile, nets to keep them out of areas and chaff in long strings to tangle up their rotors. In the meantime, I recommend ballistic helmets and a flyswatter 😁
I almost forgot, laser emitters to blind their cameras.
Need a hand held EMP weapon.
I'm sure it can and will be done. There are highly directed antennas that can focus RF EM energy, but their effectiveness is limited because of a lack of initial power.
There was a video posted a couple days ago from one of the military services twitter feeds that shows a mini drone attack and the drones as one falling from the sky.
I would assume the drone hunts you down based on your phone's connectivity/gps and facial recognition. So in this case, the best anti drone tech is very possibly not to use a phone and wearing glasses that are rimmed with infrared blocking lens and reflective lens.
If we get to the point where they are deploying these, it is definitely a time to disconnect from unencrypted and registered electronic devices. Any items in your household and vehicles will need to be disconnected from wireless tech, especially automobiles with cellular and wifi tech. EMP pulse generation would be great, but that takes a significantly large amount of energy to create, so not as easy a proposition.
The book of revelation comes to life
On the Daily Mail website today there was a video taken from a drone showing a small bomb being dropped from the drone directly onto the top of a Russian tank. Some serious damage was done.
Elon Musk in an interview with “Axios on HBO”.
‘You could make a swarm of assassin drones for very little money. By just taking the face I.D. chip that’s used in cell phones, and having a small explosive charge and a standard drone, and just have it do a grid sweep of the building until they find the person they’re looking for, ram into them and explode. You could do that right now... No new technology is needed.’
That's clearly from a TV show or movie...
Star Wars 10 "The Drone Wars".
You know this isn't a real presentation, right? I have no doubt the tech is here, but this video is fake as fuck and therefore gay
Everything in this presentation (maybe except the 3 grams of explosives) are available for me as a civil customer as we speak.
You don’t see this as a possibility? Replace the explosives with some sort of chemical or biological weapon, and you won’t sacrifice the drone either.
This shirt is highly plausible in the near future.
Or as Elon Musk said in an interview recently:
‘You could make a swarm of assassin drones for very little money. By just taking the face I.D. chip that’s used in cell phones, and having a small explosive charge and a standard drone, and just have it do a grid sweep of the building until they find the person they’re looking for, ram into them and explode. You could do that right now... No new technology is needed.’
Did you read my comment at all?
The video is still fake and fucking gay. It's from a TV show or something retarded...
Now let me reiterate:
Sorry if I miss you point, but I fail to see the difference.
Fake (I agree) video, from a series or something.
The tech is here to recreate exactly what’s shown in the video.
Does it really matter if 1 is fake as long as 2 is possible?
There’s a huge difference in “Beam me up Scotty” and the shit shown here.
This shit is scary and true.
The difference for me is that OP posted this (and the Twitter OP) as if the video was real. It makes us look stupid to believe a theatrical preformance as legitimate.
It's like posting scenes from Black Mirror and saying "GUYS LOOK! WHAT IS THIS WORLD COMING TO?!"
Is Black Mirror scary? Yeah, because the technology and concepts within black mirror are indeed not far from reality.. Fuck, some were inspired by reality and currently exist. Should we be posting TV show footage and claiming its real footage? No, we really really shouldn't be... Post the real thing or don't. But don't misrepresent reality.
Thanks. That makes sense.
I’ve seen this before, “proof” that they copy/pasted people in an audience for a speech. That speech was from some random chick flick.
Totally agree, claiming tv/movie productions to be real will only hurt your argument, especially if it’s the tech you’re after; “murderdrones are possible, and here how they might work”, or “here is how they can make a small audience look large, did you notice?”.
Using clips from “Hollywood” to prove a point can be very useful, but make sure to clearly state that it’s for “dramatic effect” only.
Agreed :) sorry if I came across like an asshole, I'm really not in real life.
I think you hit the nail on the head with how it ought to be handled. Being up front about the source and using it to illustrate what is possible is good. Some people need a visual to fully understand it, but be truthful about the source of the demonstration.