I had no choice but to commit crime because I was so overwhelmed!
That's an interesting defense. You will certainly have a lot of time in prison where you will have plenty of time on your hands to contemplate it without being crushed under the weight of incoming ballots.
Reading AP fact checkers, they simply lie and say this is not true and it never happened even though these officials have admitted on record that it happened.
If the judge allows this, then he just allowed them to break the law. We are either a country/state/ county of laws or we are something lawless. If we are lawless then the judge needs to resign.
If we are lawless then other options become available to us. It is only under rule of law that men wait for justice even if it is delayed. Without a rule of law there every man does what is right in their own eyes and some will seize justice with their own hands.
yup and thats what these asshats don't understand, wake the sleeping beast, and all hell will break loose and these social deviants will be the first ones fed to the tree of liberty. Its not that we want to do this, it becomes a duty to do this. Do we want to hell no, but if it gets that far, then its a forgone conclusion. I don't believe it will get that far, I have faith that those judges will do the right thing.
This was done knowingly, willingly. They didn't follow their own law and now they've admitted it! How could a judge disregard this? I think this is a real game changer!
Honest Doc, I slipped in the shower and that shampoo bottle lodged itself right up inside my butt. What? No! Why would I put it up there myself? Huh? Why is there a lightbulb in there too? It was on the shampoo bottle...
16-450. Location and acquisition of vote tabulating devices
The vote tabulating device may be located at any place within the state approved by the board of supervisors of the county or the governing board of other political subdivisions using the device. The same device may be jointly owned, borrowed, leased or used by two or more counties, cities or other political subdivisions to tabulate ballots cast in any election.
So this hinges on whether alternate sites were approved by the board of supervisors. Not some member of the board. But the board itself. I do not know whether this occurred or not.
I don't think Runbeck was listed as a tabulating location on Maricopa County website prior to the Election as required by the AZ statute.
16-450. Location and acquisition of vote tabulating devices
The vote tabulating device may be located at any place within the state approved by the board of supervisors of the county or the governing board of other political subdivisions using the device. The same device may be jointly owned, borrowed, leased or used by two or more counties, cities or other political subdivisions to tabulate ballots cast in any election.
I don't know either. Never bothered to look. And I am unsure that there is a statute requiring them to list this on their website either. There are so many statutes in that section that encompass a broad range of topics, it is difficult to navigate. And I am also not sure there is a statute that precludes an on the spot vote of the board.
I know they list on their website that they use the precinct register signature roster to compare signatures on early ballots, which is in direct contravention to the statute. The statute specifically requires the elector's registration record. Of which, the precinct signature roster is not. That signature roster is for in person voting, not early voting.
Last I recall, they still operate on the 2019 elections manual because Brnovich rejected the changes to the 2021 manual. But at least as far as it relates to signature verification for early ballots in the 2019 manual, Brnovich approved a procedure in direct contravention of the express language of the relevant statutes. Although I don't really know how advantageous to fraud it is to be able to use the signature roster. Odds that the same person signs the same way for the same fraudulent vote are slim to none.
I have spent a lot more time reading the procedures manual and the statutes than I ever thought I would on this topic. It would appear that beyond the statute I cited, nothing seems to cover this area. There is no mention in the procedures manual. And I can find no such statute governing the process for how the board determines where to tabulate and under what circumstances/timeline can that be altered.
If this was actually the case they should have immediately made it known to the public they were incapable of counting ballots at a certain location, then have whatever part of government is supposed to deal with things like this in their State have a totally open and transparent solution put out ASAP in which the public is kept informed and even able to oversee the process at every step. The fact that they didn't do anything of the sort, instead choosing to silently break the law and are now trying to obfuscate everything as much as possible, really tells you all you need to know.
Honestly the entire premise of them not being able to count them at MCTEC is complete BS. The facility is huge, the parking lot has spaces for 50+ vehicles, and there are multiple large public parking lots within walking distance. Why move the ballots? Why not bring more people in to count there? In no world does moving the ballots make sense. 25,000 ballots isn't even that many, even with 25 people that's 1000 ballots they would need to count per person over a time frame of multiple days! You could easily count that with less people in a single day, let alone with way more people and given multiple days time? What a complete fucking joke! Not to mention, don't most places use a freaking machine to count? Infact I seem to remember that Maricopa county uses Dominion machines. Are you telling me a MACHINE (likely multiple!) couldn't count 25,000 ballots given multiple days time? 🤡🌎
I didn't want to steal that car but the owner wouldn't let me have it for free, so it's not my fault.
Sooner or later someone will stand up for the truth, just a matter of time.
Did you know that when the world turns around 90 degrees, everyone can be standing up even as they are lying down?
I don't think you understand the gravity of the situation.
u/#topkek
Reading AP fact checkers, they simply lie and say this is not true and it never happened even though these officials have admitted on record that it happened.
And the normies will believe it.
They only had to cheat because too many radical pro American voters cast the wrong vote choice.
If the judge allows this, then he just allowed them to break the law. We are either a country/state/ county of laws or we are something lawless. If we are lawless then the judge needs to resign.
If we are lawless then other options become available to us. It is only under rule of law that men wait for justice even if it is delayed. Without a rule of law there every man does what is right in their own eyes and some will seize justice with their own hands.
Vigilante Justice is True Justice.
It's the Will of the People.
yup and thats what these asshats don't understand, wake the sleeping beast, and all hell will break loose and these social deviants will be the first ones fed to the tree of liberty. Its not that we want to do this, it becomes a duty to do this. Do we want to hell no, but if it gets that far, then its a forgone conclusion. I don't believe it will get that far, I have faith that those judges will do the right thing.
AS the judicial system looks at this and the corruption is aready set in, the judges will say move along nothing to see here.
Do you have a link to the actual document/pleading? Need it for a Red Pill haha! :) :) Thank you PK.
Hey man... I could only find these two links...hope its enough...😉😎
https://morningstarjournal.com/2022/12/22/maricopa-county-admits-they-do-not-count-ballots-at-vote-centers/
https://www.westernjournal.com/kari-lake-election-challenge-trial-reveals-major-confession-game-changer/
edit: https://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/4151
This was done knowingly, willingly. They didn't follow their own law and now they've admitted it! How could a judge disregard this? I think this is a real game changer!
No worries. Thank you. ;)
The clerk of the court Document is pretty good info...
I didn’t mean to cheat… my pants we’re coincidentally down when i tripped and i just happened to fall inside her…
Honest Doc, I slipped in the shower and that shampoo bottle lodged itself right up inside my butt. What? No! Why would I put it up there myself? Huh? Why is there a lightbulb in there too? It was on the shampoo bottle...
I am unaware of the law that is claimed here. Missing any citation to the law leaves only guesswork as to what the author is referencing.
https://www.azleg.gov/viewdocument/?docName=https://www.azleg.gov/ars/16/00450.htm
16-450. Location and acquisition of vote tabulating devices
The vote tabulating device may be located at any place within the state approved by the board of supervisors of the county or the governing board of other political subdivisions using the device. The same device may be jointly owned, borrowed, leased or used by two or more counties, cities or other political subdivisions to tabulate ballots cast in any election.
So this hinges on whether alternate sites were approved by the board of supervisors. Not some member of the board. But the board itself. I do not know whether this occurred or not.
I don't think Runbeck was listed as a tabulating location on Maricopa County website prior to the Election as required by the AZ statute.
I don't know either. Never bothered to look. And I am unsure that there is a statute requiring them to list this on their website either. There are so many statutes in that section that encompass a broad range of topics, it is difficult to navigate. And I am also not sure there is a statute that precludes an on the spot vote of the board.
I know they list on their website that they use the precinct register signature roster to compare signatures on early ballots, which is in direct contravention to the statute. The statute specifically requires the elector's registration record. Of which, the precinct signature roster is not. That signature roster is for in person voting, not early voting.
Last I recall, they still operate on the 2019 elections manual because Brnovich rejected the changes to the 2021 manual. But at least as far as it relates to signature verification for early ballots in the 2019 manual, Brnovich approved a procedure in direct contravention of the express language of the relevant statutes. Although I don't really know how advantageous to fraud it is to be able to use the signature roster. Odds that the same person signs the same way for the same fraudulent vote are slim to none.
I have spent a lot more time reading the procedures manual and the statutes than I ever thought I would on this topic. It would appear that beyond the statute I cited, nothing seems to cover this area. There is no mention in the procedures manual. And I can find no such statute governing the process for how the board determines where to tabulate and under what circumstances/timeline can that be altered.
and what is supposed to be the punishment for breaking that law?
Appointment to the governorship.
that's what i thought
Democrats are not punished. No exceptions.
of course
"Come on your honor, level with me. Laws are just a drag sometimes, right?"
Humans used to plead for their lives. I fucking hate our British "court" system.
What is the source article?
I know this evidence will be used in Kari Lake's lawsuit! GO KARI LAKE FOR AZ!
"Too many to count?"
As if volunteers and hiring more people wasn't an option. There were hundreds if not thousands wanting to do so.
If this was actually the case they should have immediately made it known to the public they were incapable of counting ballots at a certain location, then have whatever part of government is supposed to deal with things like this in their State have a totally open and transparent solution put out ASAP in which the public is kept informed and even able to oversee the process at every step. The fact that they didn't do anything of the sort, instead choosing to silently break the law and are now trying to obfuscate everything as much as possible, really tells you all you need to know.
Honestly the entire premise of them not being able to count them at MCTEC is complete BS. The facility is huge, the parking lot has spaces for 50+ vehicles, and there are multiple large public parking lots within walking distance. Why move the ballots? Why not bring more people in to count there? In no world does moving the ballots make sense. 25,000 ballots isn't even that many, even with 25 people that's 1000 ballots they would need to count per person over a time frame of multiple days! You could easily count that with less people in a single day, let alone with way more people and given multiple days time? What a complete fucking joke! Not to mention, don't most places use a freaking machine to count? Infact I seem to remember that Maricopa county uses Dominion machines. Are you telling me a MACHINE (likely multiple!) couldn't count 25,000 ballots given multiple days time? 🤡🌎
That alone should require a new election.