Normie friendly article explaining the origin of SARS-Cov-2 and the coverup.
(www.express.co.uk)
Comments (33)
sorted by:
Prof Angus Dalgleish, while a welcome recruit to our cause, is a 180 degree flip flopper. A year or two ago, he was writing super pro-jab pieces for all the MSM tabloid rags. Only recently he has come out as he's seeing turbo cancers etc among patients and even his own social circles. (He's an oncologist) As I say, good to have him on the team, but as with lots of these 180 flip-floppers, I reserve a sniff of skepticism...
What makes you think he is credible?
But what makes you think he is credible on THIS subject?
A mechanic who know Chevys might not know enough about Mercedes to get the job done.
Has he considered the possibility that "turbo cancers" came about immediately after the vaxx injections, and that they might be caused by something nefarious in the injections?
Looks like I am.
I am amazed how many people here have completely missed the point of a red pill material. Its not for us to sit in the basement splitting hairs. It's what we can put in front of the deep sleepers. Many of them do not even look at stuff that does not come from one of the main stream publications.
This is the only utility of this article - you can throw it in front of your uncle or grandma and not get called conspiracy theorist.
Thats all good, but the value is that you can easily put this in front of your ordinary normie
For sure. And we must. Constantly.
Not surprising, since he has no idea what he is talking about.
He is merely SPECULATING about what MIGHT be this or that.
He has not presented (here, at least) ANY REAL RESEARCH.
FAKE NEWS.
Would you guys who still believe this bullshit ... WAKE THE FUCK UP?
From the article:
It was NEVER "identified and sequenced" in any real, physical sense.
It was NEVER isolated and purified so that "it" could be looked at and studied.
It was NEVER then genetically sequenced to find its DNA/RNA pattern.
NEVER.
What happened was this:
(1) Some people got sick in China, just as they do every day of the year, and especially in the Winter.
(2) ONE person went to ONE doctor, who then took a fluid sample.
(3) That ONE doctor then either himself or via "Wuhan Lab" (gee, not a problem since Fauci funded that lab) did a FAKE analysis where they used a FAKE process to "identify" and compare it to SARS-CoV-1 from 2003 (which itself was also a fake analysis using a fake process).
(4) This ONE doctor then CLAIMED to the world that he had discovered something NEW (aka a "novel" coronavirus), and the Plandemic was on.
This virus DOES NOT EXIST.
It has NEVER existed.
It CANNOT exist.
Why can I say that with confidence?
Because in April 2021, Stefan Lanka, a German virologist questioned the entire process of virology. He realized that the current method (the ONLY method) used by virologists to supposedly study "viruses" started back in 1954, when John Enders came up with a new strategy to supposedly look at "viruses."
By the early 1950's, virology was dead. They had tried since the late 1800's to prove that viruses existed.
They could not.
They could NEVER take a fluid sample from a sick person (with a "virus," supposedly) and give it to a healthy person, and make the healthy person sick. They tried this on thousands of people, and NOT ONE person was EVER made sick.
They could NEVER "see" this thing they called a "virus." It was all THEORTICAL, as they had NO ACTUAL PROOF.
Virology was a dead science. Until John Enders came along, and created a FAKE process to "study viruses." In his own published paper, he included a footnote stating that maybe what he was looking at was not actually a virus, but might just be dead cellular debris, which was created from this (fake) process he came up with.
Never letting facts get in the way of making money, virology was reborn, and to this day, ALL of virology uses this FAKE PROCESS to supposedly claim that they (a) study viruses, (b) know what viruses do, and (c) vaccine companies can make drugs to stop them.
It is all a LIE, and many virologists themselves have no clue that they are studying nothing but dead cellular debris, which did not even exist in the person from whom they took the bodily fluid to study.
The person in the article DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE IS TALKING ABOUT.
Notice, he does NOT mention any research he actually did himself (if any). He just repeats what OTHER people said, and then makes up his own theory about what happened.
THAT IS NOT SCIENCE.
He might even believe his THEORY, but he has NO PROOF -- because none is possible.
Therefore, his THEORY has NO MERIT.
I don't care who he is, who he thinks he is, or how much of an expert he or anyone else thinks he is.
If his theory is WRONG, then his theory is WRONG. Period.
Learn about this subject, and stop being duped:
https://rumble.com/vtd2cf-cov-myths-exposed-scientists-prove-sars-cov-2-cov-dont-exist.html
Watch the first 40 minutes of that video, and save yourself a lifetime of fear and ignorance.
P.S. bubble_bursts has a nasty habit and history of banning me when I say something he/she disagrees with. Censorship, don't ya know. Let's see if we can have a REAL discussion here, this time.
Drs Bailey, Kaufman, Cowan? Is that you? :-)
Turtles All The Way Down.
Would you care to refute their research?
Actually, I am quite new to germ vs terrain (last 3 years). If virology is the smoke, vaccinology is surely the mirrors. I am quite convinced the latter is not just a sham but a devilishly sinister, dare I say eugenicist and totalitarian one at that. Still working my way through the topic’s greatest hits (such as the eponymous title I name-dropped above, and Dissolving Illusions and more in the pipeline) but I realise to have a rounded understanding, I have to explore virology. I will start with Virus Mania and see where I go from there. These are endlessly fascinating topics, and for obvious reasons, should be front and center of every curious-minded soul right now. I enjoy juxtaposing the views of the afore-mentioned Drs with other dissidents who are at various points on the spectra for both viruses and vaccines, from traditionalists like Malone to emerging radicals like Kirsch and Yeadon. I can listen to all these great conversations forever, and frankly would love to see more debates and discussions from all ends of these spectra. It does sometimes feel that I am watching a collection of very great enquiring minds all picking away at loose threads in the fabric of everything that has come to define their professional and inner worlds, only to realise that they have been living inside a medical, pharmaceutical construct, a war game of sorts, where they are unwitting infantry and not the generals they thought they were.
Any suggestions for exploring virology, I am all ears.
Does it mention UNC Chapel Hill??
No, it talks mostly from the scientific side - explains the science behind why it could not have come naturally
No. Nor anything meaningful about the vaccine. Still, explains the gov't lies about the origins.
A picture is emerging that Fauci/NIH (and Baric at UNC-Chapel Hill) probably funded research both at UNC and Wuhan Lab.
Wuhan Lab is where the propaganda plandemic started.
It would not be surprising if certain individuals employed there were on the payroll either to purposely start the scam, or because they were too stupid to realize they were used to start the scam.
How did it make the flu go away for two years? Oh yeah, masks.
Nobody has ever found a virus in the real world. As such, nobody can "engineer" something that doesn't exist in the first place. This is just more fear-mongering.
You think viruses don't exist? Like at all?
I Know viruses don't exist. It's all a lie. Here's my explanation for your contemplation -> https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZXM4zfkO/unleashed-special-editionisland-/
That's a really narrow view of how science works. It's ridiculous how wrong that is.
LOL, you must be kidding. The western medical establishment is based on SCIENTISM, through and through. It's literally a belief-system cult based on lies, deceptions and half-truths BECAUSE they casually decided to overlook the scientific method. They're wrong about everything save emergency/trauma care.
Virologists neither:
These are the basic tenets that the scientific method encompasses.
Virology is literally dogmatic madness, started by Pasteur the lying, thieving, plagiarizing, incompetent, fame-seeking political hack.
But thanks for trying to play the denial card.
This is Flat Earth level stuff, thanks for the laugh.
Let us not forget that the BSL4 Wuhan lab was testing it on humanised lung tissue in mice to make it more contagious, as per the Sky News Australia report around 14 months ago.
I wonder where it was possibly made in the first place???
"Gain of function" research is most likely used to figure out how to target certain individuals' bodily functions to harm or kill them, via direct "vaccine" injections. There is no other efficient way to harm someone than a direct injection.
THAT is what all the propaganda was about: making injections seem normal.
Do not forget: When US government gives money for "research" on Subject X, they can re-direct that money to something entirely different and use it for Subject Y instead, with NONE of it actually going to Subject X.
This is called "Dual Purpose Funding."
Yes good points, TY.
It's like this article is trying to deflect from MERS and Sars1 as if they too weren't probably created in labs and released aswell. Ah well. The truth will come out
Does it get in to the CIA investing in Moderna and they release the virus so they could start the industry for vaccine platforms for viruses they thought would be made in people's basements (probably aided by the FBI/CIA) and that the J&J vaccine is the only one that kind of works and that's why the media constant shits on it because the CIA is invested in Moderna tech?
If you have had any experience red pilling deep sleepers, you would know the answer for that. (Oh, also if you read the article). The extent of disclosure depends on the audience, and precisely why this article is useful for redpilling.