I think this is the first of the official disclosures to FL medical professionals. The Kubler-Ross paradigm is gonna be rough on most providers. I went on sabbatical because I didn't want to be implicated. I warned everyone I could and I never once did a TikTok dance or played "hero." Small disclosures prior to the VAIDS shoe dropping. Yikes. I got tired of the tin foil hat jokes at my expense. Lost my mom and brother to the vax because he took the bait and mom thought he was smarter.
For those that aren't familiar with ONS, they're The Office for National Statistics (ONS) is the UK's largest independent producer of official statistics.
Speak to any brit and you normally get a thumbs up on the reliability.
In the early days I tracked the figures from ONS and determined that even if the figures were based on flawed fundamentals, the trend would reveal something.
What I found upset me so much I stopped tracking it.
The vaccinated were losing immunity compared to unvaccinated, month by month, at an alarming rate. I tracked it for about 6 months, and the projections literally made my mind crawl back into its shell. I didn't have the heart to publish. I made a post about it here at the time (over a year ago) but deferred to my wife in this instance and didn't stick my head above the parapet.
The ONS figures might be tweaked, but they are consistently tweaked, whcih means the trend is reliable.
They have this data available already for 1/1/21-5/31/22. It is damningā¦.though you have to do your own calculations as they mysteriously miscalculated all the death rates to benefit the vxd numbers.
Because if they don't, then the data they NOW collect will NOT be reflective of the reality at all. It will only serve to downplay the fact that the jabs kill, and will MISLEAD many into believing they're safer than they are.
This reminds me of how they kept changing the data before...for example, when they tweaked the cycle threshold for the PCR up to like 35 so as to always get a "positive" covid test so as to prolong the "pandemic." Or when they changed the definition of a vaccine...etc...
It's the continuing moving goalposts that end up changing history. If we look back at the Polio vaccine, many believe it was effective. But many are unaware that they changed what symptoms constituted as "Polio," - they made it far more restrictive, thereby getting less polio cases - thereby insinuating the vaccine was responsible for less cases! But we all know that was BS.
So now, if this "data" is collected - think of how fewer deaths will be "officially" recorded. And all that data from 2021-2022 is lost in the ether.
Of course...I couldn't link to the actual article, so not sure if they are planning to tease out the data from before...
Depends on how they're going to define "unvaccinated" i suppose.
The previous definition was people who didn't take it, people who were within 2 weeks of dose and those who have not had a booster were all classified as "unvaccinated"
Don't forget "undetermined" which in the US was used interchangeably with unvaccinated. If the hospital didn't ask your status (or didn't record it), and you were hospitalized for COVID, you were recorded/considered "unvaccinated" for statistical purposes.
Late last night the Florida Department of Health posted a warning. https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/FLDOH/bulletins/3499942
This should encourage others to bring their state data and then start banning the dangerous substances.
Idaho has a bill under consideration that would make administration of MRNA vax a misdemeanor.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/two-idaho-lawmakers-introduce-legislation-criminalize-giving-out-mrna-vaccines
That is excellent.
Huge. South Dakota or Tennessee or Texas needs to one up and make it a capital offense
Wild!
I think this is the first of the official disclosures to FL medical professionals. The Kubler-Ross paradigm is gonna be rough on most providers. I went on sabbatical because I didn't want to be implicated. I warned everyone I could and I never once did a TikTok dance or played "hero." Small disclosures prior to the VAIDS shoe dropping. Yikes. I got tired of the tin foil hat jokes at my expense. Lost my mom and brother to the vax because he took the bait and mom thought he was smarter.
Condolences, Anon
"1,700% increase in VAERS reports".
For those that aren't familiar with ONS, they're The Office for National Statistics (ONS) is the UK's largest independent producer of official statistics.
Speak to any brit and you normally get a thumbs up on the reliability.
Not according to the comments.
In the early days I tracked the figures from ONS and determined that even if the figures were based on flawed fundamentals, the trend would reveal something.
What I found upset me so much I stopped tracking it.
The vaccinated were losing immunity compared to unvaccinated, month by month, at an alarming rate. I tracked it for about 6 months, and the projections literally made my mind crawl back into its shell. I didn't have the heart to publish. I made a post about it here at the time (over a year ago) but deferred to my wife in this instance and didn't stick my head above the parapet.
The ONS figures might be tweaked, but they are consistently tweaked, whcih means the trend is reliable.
Moments like this are why the Crown made sure the citizenry were disarmed.
Still legal to own a crossbow.. Time to go medieval on their asses :D
Same day as Putin's speech
They have this data available already for 1/1/21-5/31/22. It is damningā¦.though you have to do your own calculations as they mysteriously miscalculated all the death rates to benefit the vxd numbers.
Are they gonna include the data from 2021-2022?
Because if they don't, then the data they NOW collect will NOT be reflective of the reality at all. It will only serve to downplay the fact that the jabs kill, and will MISLEAD many into believing they're safer than they are.
This reminds me of how they kept changing the data before...for example, when they tweaked the cycle threshold for the PCR up to like 35 so as to always get a "positive" covid test so as to prolong the "pandemic." Or when they changed the definition of a vaccine...etc...
It's the continuing moving goalposts that end up changing history. If we look back at the Polio vaccine, many believe it was effective. But many are unaware that they changed what symptoms constituted as "Polio," - they made it far more restrictive, thereby getting less polio cases - thereby insinuating the vaccine was responsible for less cases! But we all know that was BS.
So now, if this "data" is collected - think of how fewer deaths will be "officially" recorded. And all that data from 2021-2022 is lost in the ether.
Of course...I couldn't link to the actual article, so not sure if they are planning to tease out the data from before...
Depends on how they're going to define "unvaccinated" i suppose.
The previous definition was people who didn't take it, people who were within 2 weeks of dose and those who have not had a booster were all classified as "unvaccinated"
Which is pretty much everyone at this point.
Don't forget "undetermined" which in the US was used interchangeably with unvaccinated. If the hospital didn't ask your status (or didn't record it), and you were hospitalized for COVID, you were recorded/considered "unvaccinated" for statistical purposes.