MT bill would ban vaccinated from donating blood.
(dailymontanan.com)
Comments (28)
sorted by:
Label vaxxed blood and unvaxxed blood. Do not allow the vaxxed to get unvaxxed blood and only allow unvaxxed blood for the unvaxxed.
Still couldn't trust the doctors or medical professionals to NOT LIE to us.
That sounds good, but the vax batches differ. Maybe giving vaxxed blood to someone who is vaxxed but got a lesser batch might hurt them.
Maybe society just has to manage with less donated blood and only from unvaxxed.
My wife had to undergo surgery a couple months ago, we let the doctors know she wanted to self-donate if they thought she would need a transfusion.
Considering there was an almost perpetual blood shortage before this BS, self-donation should be mandatory for anyone who's capable as it would be less burdensome on supply and it's got better prognosis. Then there'd actually be a solid supply for people in the "beggars can't be choosers" situations like catastrophic blood loss after vehicular accidents.
Somehow, that idea gives me the heebeegeebees as well. There will be a shortage of blood, as there already is. Will (((they))) then force the unvaxxed to give blood? I don't know how hospitals would make up a shortfall otherwise. Perhaps the doctors can do with less, but I don't think hospitals just hook up any old person to blood - they can hydrate people with saline solution or plasma, for example. The shortage will mean some people are going to die.
The problem is that some vaxxed blood tends to clot, so is pretty useless. So I can understand why they are coming up with the legislation. They currently have to throw away the useless stuff.
I don't know, fren.
That’s like asking the waitress in the diner if there are any products in the kitchen containing peanuts. Cause your kid’s deathly allergic.
I think the jabbed should not be allowed to donate. The blood supply is already ruined since they've been donating for 2 years (I know they do, my jabbed mil donates regularly) its no different than getting hiv or some other disease from tainted blood, and it does and will.kill people. I think they need to prepare for targeted donations (ie live donations from known safe family or friends) and allow this/plan for this instead of the banks. I'd rather get blood from my daughter or husband (yes we all have same type) than a bank anyway, but was told it isn't done.
Yeah, they're right, better to decimate the population as a whole. I mean, that was the original plan after all.
Decimate means 10%. I think the Cabal has bigger numbers in mind.
Both the black hats and white hats want depopulation, just different target groups, supposedly.
Talk about the biggest red pill right here!
I would drive to Montana to donate blood if this passes. I'm only a couple hours away.
So all the unvaxxed will be able to use our blood, but not be able to actually give any themselves. I feel like this is short sighted and will eventually cause blood shortages for those who were not cowards or idiots and stayed away for the bioweapon.
Someone on this post commented that the vaxxed should donate, but only for other vaxxed. The unvaxxed should only donate to other unvaxxed.
A great comment and potentially a resolution. I don't think it's in the bill tho, correct me if I am wrong. At that point I guess then one would have to trust those people who just gave people with a cold remdesivir for the extra kickbacks :(......health system so fucked but thanks for telling me I have to admit didn't read the comments on this one, will have to be sure to do that!
It's not in the bill, but as the commentor wrote, it should be.
Yes, agreed!
I'm sure Bill Gates is close to releasing his lab grown blood that already comes loaded with mRNA
I've been questioning this for some time now. As someone who is unvaxed, but has had to receive a transfusion in the past.....I've been concerned about if I needed it ever again and how to know that the blood I'd receive has NO jab junk in it.
If you're undergoing an operation that you know will require a transfusion, you can donate your own blood ahead of time.
I seem to remember hearing that Jehovah Witnesses couldn't accept donated blood, and there was some way to get their own blood for transfusions ahead of time. Any anons know more about this than I do?
I recently called a blood bank to ask the process. I was told you need to get a Dr's prescription (either for yourself to store your own blood or for your compatible family member (specifically named) to donate blood for your surgery. The blood draw needs to be done at least 3 days in advance to the surgery date "to complete their testing." My fear is not trusting that you would 100% receive the correct sample.
There is a post by eagle-eyes2020 here with some videos and info on bloodless medicine and surgery:
https://greatawakening.win/p/16aTH9Al8h/80-of-the-blood-supply-contamina/c/
Apparently no blood is acceptable for transfusion for Jehovah's Witnesses.
https://www.thehealthyjournal.com/faq/can-a-jehovahs-witness-bank-their-own-blood#:~:text=Can%20a%20Jehovah%27s%20Witness%20bank%20their%20own%20blood%3F,donate%20or%20store%20their%20own%20blood%20for%20transfusion.
Thanks for the link.