I can't figure out what is new in this article.
They mention "In a bombshell court filing late Monday night, Durham for the first time suggested Hillary Clinton's campaign..." , but what date? They show a court filing from 4/4/2022 which was a monday. So this is old news?
As near as I can tell from archive.org it's the exact same article as the last update. Word for word. Could be a site glitch or maybe Solomon is trying to drop us a hint.
FWIW: He did also post it on his Twitter account so there would seem to be some level of intent behind it...
John is talking about (confusingly) two different items in his article.
In a bombshell court filing late Monday night, Durham for the first time suggested Hillary Clinton's campaign, her researchers and others formed a "joint venture or conspiracy" for the purpose of weaving the collusion story to harm Trump's election chances and then the start of his presidency.
New text msg confirming a conspiracy in a document filed Monday. Sauce not found.
Durham also revealed he has unearthed a text message showing Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann falsely told the FBI he was not working on behalf of any client when he delivered now-discredited anti-Trump research in the lead-up to the 2016 election.
Sussman’s lying to the fbi has been known and is a throwback. Confusingly, he included sauce for this fact, but not the headline claim.
Now that Hillary’s campaign has pleaded guilty to the FEC for calling RussiaGate “Legal Fees” the campaign is a co-conspirator with Joffre, Sussman, et al.
Right. This is confusing. We saw this email last year during the trial. Also, this story talks about the late Monday evening filing but the story was published Monday just after noon.
Conspiracy! Say it with me: CONSPIRACY. Now spell it with me C-O-N-S-P-I-R-A-C-Y.
That is what is new. The early trials against Sussman and Danchenko were to pierce the veil of attorney-client privilege and to get some facts entered into the record without the threat of RICO and/or seditious conspiracy hanging over their heads and broadening the case to soon. There are some important points that wont need to be argued now.
Timing is perfect. Wonder what NY DA, Fulsome DA and SC Dumbass do now with a seditious conspiracy or RICO trial against those they are trying to protect, running.
I can't figure out what is new in this article. They mention "In a bombshell court filing late Monday night, Durham for the first time suggested Hillary Clinton's campaign..." , but what date? They show a court filing from 4/4/2022 which was a monday. So this is old news?
Yeah why is this pinned? Sussman was acquitted of lying to the FBI about this. That's not to say he didn't lie, but the fact is he was acquitted.
What is the new info?
I'm not blaming the OP. I saw the article earlier and couldn't figure it out. It was an article from today.
As near as I can tell from archive.org it's the exact same article as the last update. Word for word. Could be a site glitch or maybe Solomon is trying to drop us a hint.
FWIW: He did also post it on his Twitter account so there would seem to be some level of intent behind it...
https://twitter.com/jsolomonReports/status/1640399179741642765
Here's the filing referenced:
https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2022-04/04519147331.pdf
I even went to archive.org and downloaded an old copy of the file and ran a checksum and they're the same.
c0dc8ceb1222a259e03d0a2522fb04a8 04519147331 (1).pdf c0dc8ceb1222a259e03d0a2522fb04a8 04519147331.pdf
I looked in the filing for any references to March and found none.
IMO a bit of a spotlight is being shined on Sussman for some reason.
John is talking about (confusingly) two different items in his article.
No new sauce, none of this makes sense.
Now that Hillary’s campaign has pleaded guilty to the FEC for calling RussiaGate “Legal Fees” the campaign is a co-conspirator with Joffre, Sussman, et al.
Right. This is confusing. We saw this email last year during the trial. Also, this story talks about the late Monday evening filing but the story was published Monday just after noon.
Conspiracy! Say it with me: CONSPIRACY. Now spell it with me C-O-N-S-P-I-R-A-C-Y.
That is what is new. The early trials against Sussman and Danchenko were to pierce the veil of attorney-client privilege and to get some facts entered into the record without the threat of RICO and/or seditious conspiracy hanging over their heads and broadening the case to soon. There are some important points that wont need to be argued now.
Timing is perfect. Wonder what NY DA, Fulsome DA and SC Dumbass do now with a seditious conspiracy or RICO trial against those they are trying to protect, running.
End game. Act III. D5. NCSWIC.
Saying it was a conspiracy isn't new. That's what was being said a year ago.
See, here is a link to an article written a year ago about it being a "joint venture or conspiracy".
https://www.thefreedomtimes.com/2022/04/05/new-durham-filing-reveals-text-message-from-sussman-joint-venture-or-conspiracy-to-smear-trump/
Yes, old news regurgitated to increase clicks and ad revenue.
It‘s updated. Get RIF.
Ok. What exactly was updated in it?
6 up.
I think it is, and it was the major revelation. Quite important, really, proving both that he lied and it was Hillary's plot.