They stole it. Have a friend who had all the data but nothing was done in 2016 and again in 2020. It was stolen twice. So was SOS position, The AG, and the State Auditor ALL DEMS won in 2020 in spite of Trump taking the state and they control all the state elections. However our Republican state legislature passed some bills that have helped to keep the elections safer from being abused.
Cooper can no longer run and Mark Robinson our Conservative Lt. General will be running for the Governor in 2024. He WILL win.
We have been chipping away at the Dem takeover. There is finally a Republican majority in the State Supreme Court. They have allowed voter ID for future elections which the people voted on in 2016 and passed by majority but was in being contested in the courts for since 2016.
Republicans also have the power to redistrict now.
Because half of Republican voters just LOOOOVE the moxie of the Democrat Governor candidate, and the Republicans just didn't put up a good enough candidate to be competitive.
Alaska's Senate race saw nearly 90% of the voters choose a Republican. And a Democrat won their only House seat.
It's just horseshit. If the Republicans had any balls at all, they would impeach and remove the Governor, the SOS, the DAs, and all the other weasels for benefiting from fraud, secure elections, investigate the people who are stealing elections, execute them, and then actually start doing things to make our lives better.
The demon-worshippers who have been systematically stealing our country for generations will continue to do so as long as the "punishment" is being called to testify under oath, lying their pants off, and then reorganizing their corrupt business and political practices under new shell corporations.
Heads need to roll- legally of course- before any real change can actually happen. If the punishment for stealing elections or benefiting from stolen elections is nothing, they'll do it every time.
You understand a larger portion of your taxes will be going to welfare to support these single mother households.
By an large, most of these women have baby daddy problems and not the ideal type of parent. Some have drug problems and/or worse. The majority of them are trainwrecks in society. Again this varies by state, but I'd be willing to wager North Carolina has a lot of trainwrecks that can barely take care of themselves.
It's a feel good story to save a fetus and out pops a baby. What about the next 18+ years of its life? We don't talk about that enough. If baby is from a single parent household there's a high probability of crime in its future. And don't tell me the Churches will help cover millions of these kiddos. That's a tall task and hasn't really been a thing since the 40s-50s. Most of the women requesting these abortions are not the Christian type.
Also if this bill bans abortions after 12 weeks, are there exceptions? What about a woman who was raped and doesn't want the child? Is she unable to terminate via abortion at 13 weeks? Please tell me there are exceptions written into the bill. A women who has been raped should NOT be forced to have the baby.
It's not about money, it's about the taking of a defenseless life. In my humble opinion, the first heartbeat should be the absolute earliest point.
With regard to exceptions and post-first trimester, could I ask: with the possible exception of harm to the mother, why does the child need to develop for more than three months if it was the product of rape or incest? Why wait 91 days after conception to decide to kill it?
And with regard to the "who will take care of it" point, I'd ask this: how many people out there want to conceive but can't? How many wait to adopt only to find themselves on a waitlist? There seem to be plenty of people wanting children; there's no need to slaughter so many of God's creations in the misguided notion that nobody wants them.
Okay i used deserve as you used afforded. My argument basically is. Being born in a poor family doesn't mean abortion is the solution. They should be able to decide for themselves if they want to live or not
They are free to put these children up for adoption by the millions of infertile couples who cannot have a child. Two wrongs don't make a 'right' -EVER!
Makes you wonder how NC elected a blue-commie governor.
I don't think we did.
They aren’t elected, they are placed in office via illegal means.
Can’t imagine he could pronounce DOMINION😏😏😏
They stole it. Have a friend who had all the data but nothing was done in 2016 and again in 2020. It was stolen twice. So was SOS position, The AG, and the State Auditor ALL DEMS won in 2020 in spite of Trump taking the state and they control all the state elections. However our Republican state legislature passed some bills that have helped to keep the elections safer from being abused.
Cooper can no longer run and Mark Robinson our Conservative Lt. General will be running for the Governor in 2024. He WILL win.
We have been chipping away at the Dem takeover. There is finally a Republican majority in the State Supreme Court. They have allowed voter ID for future elections which the people voted on in 2016 and passed by majority but was in being contested in the courts for since 2016.
Republicans also have the power to redistrict now.
Winning!!!
They have a Dem governor and a Republican SUPER majority in the legislature?
There's a few states like this.
Because half of Republican voters just LOOOOVE the moxie of the Democrat Governor candidate, and the Republicans just didn't put up a good enough candidate to be competitive.
Alaska's Senate race saw nearly 90% of the voters choose a Republican. And a Democrat won their only House seat.
It's just horseshit. If the Republicans had any balls at all, they would impeach and remove the Governor, the SOS, the DAs, and all the other weasels for benefiting from fraud, secure elections, investigate the people who are stealing elections, execute them, and then actually start doing things to make our lives better.
The demon-worshippers who have been systematically stealing our country for generations will continue to do so as long as the "punishment" is being called to testify under oath, lying their pants off, and then reorganizing their corrupt business and political practices under new shell corporations.
Heads need to roll- legally of course- before any real change can actually happen. If the punishment for stealing elections or benefiting from stolen elections is nothing, they'll do it every time.
Another win for the children...
This is what a win looks like.
Glad they did this...but wish they would have passed the law for open carry first (or at the same time).
Or Constitutional Carry which passed the Judiciary committee but was back burnered until next session by the GOP leader.
NC gonna be the new FL
Thank You Lord!
I am amazed at the stupid people who knowingly hate God. They better wake up soon.
You understand a larger portion of your taxes will be going to welfare to support these single mother households.
By an large, most of these women have baby daddy problems and not the ideal type of parent. Some have drug problems and/or worse. The majority of them are trainwrecks in society. Again this varies by state, but I'd be willing to wager North Carolina has a lot of trainwrecks that can barely take care of themselves.
It's a feel good story to save a fetus and out pops a baby. What about the next 18+ years of its life? We don't talk about that enough. If baby is from a single parent household there's a high probability of crime in its future. And don't tell me the Churches will help cover millions of these kiddos. That's a tall task and hasn't really been a thing since the 40s-50s. Most of the women requesting these abortions are not the Christian type.
Also if this bill bans abortions after 12 weeks, are there exceptions? What about a woman who was raped and doesn't want the child? Is she unable to terminate via abortion at 13 weeks? Please tell me there are exceptions written into the bill. A women who has been raped should NOT be forced to have the baby.
It's not about money, it's about the taking of a defenseless life. In my humble opinion, the first heartbeat should be the absolute earliest point.
With regard to exceptions and post-first trimester, could I ask: with the possible exception of harm to the mother, why does the child need to develop for more than three months if it was the product of rape or incest? Why wait 91 days after conception to decide to kill it?
And with regard to the "who will take care of it" point, I'd ask this: how many people out there want to conceive but can't? How many wait to adopt only to find themselves on a waitlist? There seem to be plenty of people wanting children; there's no need to slaughter so many of God's creations in the misguided notion that nobody wants them.
And why does everyone want to kill the poor? Dont theh deserve to live like the rest of us?
Deserve? Not necessarily. Deserving something implies entitlement.
They should be afforded opportunities and a chance to learn new skills and improve themselves to work.
It is far better to offer education than cash.
Okay i used deserve as you used afforded. My argument basically is. Being born in a poor family doesn't mean abortion is the solution. They should be able to decide for themselves if they want to live or not
Abortion is murder. A society which condones it has no morals.
They are free to put these children up for adoption by the millions of infertile couples who cannot have a child. Two wrongs don't make a 'right' -EVER!
Adoption is an option. I know bc I adopted my own child.