Cord blood donations or I guess in this case banking it, are promoted as a more ethical alternative to abortion stem cells. I don't know of much opposition to the practice in conservative circles. Frankly in theory it does seem fine. However this seems like a giant red flag that they're just using it to get baby blood. I wouldn't trust it unless you can do some serious homework on who is getting their hands on it.
https://femtechinsider.com/chrissy-teigen-cord-blood-registry/
There is no such thing as "abortion stem cells." In the case of umbilical or placental stem cell therapy done in Central and South America, these stem cells are obtained from pregnant women immediately following the birth of their child, who are part of a registry that certifies they are disease-free, and that their pregnancy conforms to certain standards.
Under absolutely no circumstances whatsoever are stem cells ever obtained from random abortions. Not only would that be unethical, but dangerous. In the U.S., stem cells are only obtained from bone marrow aspiration from the pelvis.
One can also "bank" stem cells for their children, obtained from placental material...but this is only useful for the child it was originally from.
"Fetal stem cells can be isolated from fetal blood and bone marrow as well as from other fetal tissues, including liver and kidney. Fetal blood is a rich source of haemopoietic stem cells (HSC), which proliferate more rapidly than those in cord blood or adult bone marrow."
"First trimester fetal blood also contains a population of non-haemopoietic mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), which support haemopoiesis and can differentiate along multiple lineages. In terms of eventual downstream application, both fetal HSC and MSC have advantages over their adult counterparts, including better intrinsic homing and engraftment, greater multipotentiality and lower immunogenicity."
I am not incorrect. There is NO CLINIC IN THE WORLD that isolates stem cells from abortion material. Yes, you can derive some stem cells from many sources, but most are inferior.
The paper you cited is from 2004, and is simply an exploratory thesis probably from a couple of people in the industry starting a clinic. Many clinics have been shut down over the past years because of fraud. The claims made in this paper are not substantiated.
I know plenty about stem cells, PRP, and platelet lysate. I am being treated here in the States next week.
That’s a pretty bold statement, since you don’t have any idea what’s happening in the black market. The technology available to the elites, is not even known by any of us plebs.
If you understood the process of stem cell extraction and re-injection, you would understand. Stem cell numbers from umbilical/placental sources need to be amplified in a lab, since their numbers are so low. You would absolutely NOT take amplified stem cells from an unknown source and inject them into a body. Those cells could have genetic disease, or any number of issues. Even using stem cells from a registered pregnancy is risky and ill-advised. The clinics that might do so in Central and South America come and go like the wind, and disappear before anyone can be prosecuted.
Only highly-regulated stem cell procedures for orthopedic reasons occur here in the states, using cells derived from the patient. Even so, the FDA has had plenty to do to eliminate the fraud.
One would have to be a complete idiot to go to a clinic and get amplified stem cells from an unknown source injected into their body. Having one's own stem cells banked is a completely different scenario. Currently, even amplifying one's own stem cells is not allowed within the U.S.
You’re assuming the Reason The Using The stemcell’s. Or anything blood related. Your comments are based purely on your own experience regarding what you personally need.
The needs of the deep state, Cabal of Satanic pedophiles, far surpasses what you’re looking for. These people are evil, or evil has no end.
There is no other use for stem cells not already offered by clinics around the world. My original statement: "there is no such thing as abortion stem cells," stands.
Now you're changing the argument to "blood related." It would be foolish to use stem cells from an unknown source. It has no medical value, not even in research. Research requires standards of referential history.
The cabal is not interested in stem cells from an unknown source. Period. They have other interests in human-derived tissues and hormones.
When I was in the Navy, about 74-75, we were taking cord blood samples for some type of testing. We were told it was for a study. We also bagged up the placenta and sent it with the blood samples. Did it the year I worked in the delivery room. I guess this stuff could have been going on for a very long time. Or it was an innocent medical study. 🤷🏼♂️
Drs have been "stealing" cord blood after babies are born and the cord is still attached.... I witnessed it. No permission given, none asked for, Dr just drew it out with a syringe. And it was not to store for future medical use for the child, either. That right there was big bucks for doc. I'm sure he sold it.
Anyway, cord blood is definitely better than aborted fetus blood. I am not falling for that bullshit..... they are taking blood from live babies that didn't "die" from their abortions. Sick sick sick all of it.
Ive been trying to tell people here since I joined, that adrenochrome is a false front to make us look silly. I do believe it is probably used as a drug, like in that Johnny Depp movie, but the real anti aging miracle cure thing they are after is stem cells. Stem cells are the reason for their abortion stance along with the ritual sacrifice aspect, eugenics and organ harvesting.
There was a huge national debate over the use of stem cells in the late 90s early aughts that has completely disappeared from the national conversation. There is a reason it was memory holed and replaced by the false adrenochrome accusations.
You are incorrect. Adrenochrome is a huge business. China in particular has the corner on this market. They have captive Uyghurs that are used for organ harvesting (we know this for sure) so I imagine they are also the source for their 60+ Adrenochrome laboratories. Other countries offer it for sale also, including the U.S.
Here is a description of ADRENOCHROME from American Custom Chemicals Corporation:
"Adrenochrome is an oxidation product of adrenaline (ephinephrine, norepinephrine). It inhibits COMT (Catechol-O-methyltransferase), promotes the synthesis of prostaglandins in brain tissue in vitro, promotes the secretion of nerve growth factor by L-M ce."
Cord blood donations or I guess in this case banking it, are promoted as a more ethical alternative to abortion stem cells. I don't know of much opposition to the practice in conservative circles. Frankly in theory it does seem fine. However this seems like a giant red flag that they're just using it to get baby blood. I wouldn't trust it unless you can do some serious homework on who is getting their hands on it. https://femtechinsider.com/chrissy-teigen-cord-blood-registry/
Read the fine print.
What does it say in the fine print?
I don't know, but I wouldn't sign anything related to this without reading the fine print.
Of course, but I thought you were suggesting you actually knew what was in the small print and it was nefarious.
There is no such thing as "abortion stem cells." In the case of umbilical or placental stem cell therapy done in Central and South America, these stem cells are obtained from pregnant women immediately following the birth of their child, who are part of a registry that certifies they are disease-free, and that their pregnancy conforms to certain standards.
Under absolutely no circumstances whatsoever are stem cells ever obtained from random abortions. Not only would that be unethical, but dangerous. In the U.S., stem cells are only obtained from bone marrow aspiration from the pelvis.
One can also "bank" stem cells for their children, obtained from placental material...but this is only useful for the child it was originally from.
Sorry, but you are incorrect. See below:
"Fetal stem cells can be isolated from fetal blood and bone marrow as well as from other fetal tissues, including liver and kidney. Fetal blood is a rich source of haemopoietic stem cells (HSC), which proliferate more rapidly than those in cord blood or adult bone marrow."
"First trimester fetal blood also contains a population of non-haemopoietic mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), which support haemopoiesis and can differentiate along multiple lineages. In terms of eventual downstream application, both fetal HSC and MSC have advantages over their adult counterparts, including better intrinsic homing and engraftment, greater multipotentiality and lower immunogenicity."
Source:
PubMed Fetal stem cells
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15582543/#:~:text=Fetal%20stem%20cells%20can%20be,blood%20or%20adult%20bone%20marrow.
I am not incorrect. There is NO CLINIC IN THE WORLD that isolates stem cells from abortion material. Yes, you can derive some stem cells from many sources, but most are inferior.
The paper you cited is from 2004, and is simply an exploratory thesis probably from a couple of people in the industry starting a clinic. Many clinics have been shut down over the past years because of fraud. The claims made in this paper are not substantiated.
I know plenty about stem cells, PRP, and platelet lysate. I am being treated here in the States next week.
No clinic in the world.
That’s a pretty bold statement, since you don’t have any idea what’s happening in the black market. The technology available to the elites, is not even known by any of us plebs.
I would not discount it. These people are evil.
If you understood the process of stem cell extraction and re-injection, you would understand. Stem cell numbers from umbilical/placental sources need to be amplified in a lab, since their numbers are so low. You would absolutely NOT take amplified stem cells from an unknown source and inject them into a body. Those cells could have genetic disease, or any number of issues. Even using stem cells from a registered pregnancy is risky and ill-advised. The clinics that might do so in Central and South America come and go like the wind, and disappear before anyone can be prosecuted.
Only highly-regulated stem cell procedures for orthopedic reasons occur here in the states, using cells derived from the patient. Even so, the FDA has had plenty to do to eliminate the fraud.
One would have to be a complete idiot to go to a clinic and get amplified stem cells from an unknown source injected into their body. Having one's own stem cells banked is a completely different scenario. Currently, even amplifying one's own stem cells is not allowed within the U.S.
You’re assuming the Reason The Using The stemcell’s. Or anything blood related. Your comments are based purely on your own experience regarding what you personally need.
The needs of the deep state, Cabal of Satanic pedophiles, far surpasses what you’re looking for. These people are evil, or evil has no end.
There is no other use for stem cells not already offered by clinics around the world. My original statement: "there is no such thing as abortion stem cells," stands.
Now you're changing the argument to "blood related." It would be foolish to use stem cells from an unknown source. It has no medical value, not even in research. Research requires standards of referential history.
The cabal is not interested in stem cells from an unknown source. Period. They have other interests in human-derived tissues and hormones.
I'm getting conflicting images from this ad. Does Chrissy put cord blood and tissue on her sandwiches?
i honestly think she/it is a tranny.
No, I've seen pics she's posted of her when pregnant and topless with her big bazooms. As wide as her face is, she's still female in my opinion.
She is an evil satanist witch. Period.
When I was in the Navy, about 74-75, we were taking cord blood samples for some type of testing. We were told it was for a study. We also bagged up the placenta and sent it with the blood samples. Did it the year I worked in the delivery room. I guess this stuff could have been going on for a very long time. Or it was an innocent medical study. 🤷🏼♂️
Drs have been "stealing" cord blood after babies are born and the cord is still attached.... I witnessed it. No permission given, none asked for, Dr just drew it out with a syringe. And it was not to store for future medical use for the child, either. That right there was big bucks for doc. I'm sure he sold it. Anyway, cord blood is definitely better than aborted fetus blood. I am not falling for that bullshit..... they are taking blood from live babies that didn't "die" from their abortions. Sick sick sick all of it.
Ive been trying to tell people here since I joined, that adrenochrome is a false front to make us look silly. I do believe it is probably used as a drug, like in that Johnny Depp movie, but the real anti aging miracle cure thing they are after is stem cells. Stem cells are the reason for their abortion stance along with the ritual sacrifice aspect, eugenics and organ harvesting.
There was a huge national debate over the use of stem cells in the late 90s early aughts that has completely disappeared from the national conversation. There is a reason it was memory holed and replaced by the false adrenochrome accusations.
You are incorrect. Adrenochrome is a huge business. China in particular has the corner on this market. They have captive Uyghurs that are used for organ harvesting (we know this for sure) so I imagine they are also the source for their 60+ Adrenochrome laboratories. Other countries offer it for sale also, including the U.S.
Here is a description of ADRENOCHROME from American Custom Chemicals Corporation:
"Adrenochrome is an oxidation product of adrenaline (ephinephrine, norepinephrine). It inhibits COMT (Catechol-O-methyltransferase), promotes the synthesis of prostaglandins in brain tissue in vitro, promotes the secretion of nerve growth factor by L-M ce."
Links you might want to peruse: