I live in canada, and one of the rumors going around is that trudy solely targeted ontario because he wants to use this crisis to get more votes/not rig the next election again. Ontario has more than a third of our total population and the vast majority of the forests here are wetlands/"swampey" (if you've ever been to louisiana it's kinda the same feel). Our next federal election is happening later this year, so it makes sense he'd do this now just in time for the re-vote.
I know there were a few studies on it showing that the "consistency" of them isn't natural and could only be man-made. Also the speed in which they were occurring and the colour of the smoke suggested some sort of fuel-additive like gas or kerosene.
I've seen these videos multiple times but some people with knowledge of forest fires have commented that this is a method of actually fighting these out of control fires. Supposedly it's a method of containment in some regard if you strategically set flame to certain areas.
It's a legit method of control; A fire needs three things to burn, those being flammable material, sufficient heat to ignite the material, and oxygen to accelerate the flame (producing more heat, which ignites surrounding material in an exponential growth as the fire's surface area increases).
A carefully controlled burn over an area in the path the fire is spreading in, ahead of that fire, helps prevent further spread by removing flammable material.
See how information that is real and true is confusing to people that aren't involved? The world is large and complex and what absolutely looks like one thing doesn't mean that's what it is. And that's fine. It's a big complex world. It's wrong to purposely confuse or waste people's time. It's good to educate and walk on confidently.
Only mentioned here because it's my pet peeve and it's wrecking people's lives being manipulated like that. I expect it from media companies, not "teammates".
In hindsight, I could have clarified that just because a controlled burn is a legitimate strategy, it does not necessarily mean that this is what is occurring.
Was wondering about that...like when they set control burns on the ground on an opposing perimeter so that the flames go towards each other and stop the fire.
They're pushing climate change so they need to make it look like warming climate caused by humans is causing all the forests to burn down. They just started way to early in the season cause these people are stupid, now it's obvious that it's arson. Trudeau will trot out on the TV talking down ro canadians about how its our fault the forests are burning down since we drive cars or something and the only way to fix it is higher taxes.
I can think of one or two. The southernmost forests of Quebec are predominantly maple trees, but there's also a substantial coniferous-dominant region to the north. Coniferous needles produce toxic smoke due to the high concentration of terpenes.
Either maple syrup is going to get price gouged, or we can expect to eventually see large volumes of toxic smoke being blown down into New England by the winter trough winds.
…and that’s not from an idiot, take it for granted.
The truth about the Canadian wildfires - True North report
Cites number of arson charges already, etc.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v9HeYFrMOCc
It doesn't take a genius to figure out they were set. Is the world so stupid we can't figure this stuff out?
Why the masses still thinking that it is a natural event? I don’t get it either.
Keep reading and it will make sense
I live in canada, and one of the rumors going around is that trudy solely targeted ontario because he wants to use this crisis to get more votes/not rig the next election again. Ontario has more than a third of our total population and the vast majority of the forests here are wetlands/"swampey" (if you've ever been to louisiana it's kinda the same feel). Our next federal election is happening later this year, so it makes sense he'd do this now just in time for the re-vote.
So have there been any arson investigations? Or are they still claiming natural climate change?
I know there were a few studies on it showing that the "consistency" of them isn't natural and could only be man-made. Also the speed in which they were occurring and the colour of the smoke suggested some sort of fuel-additive like gas or kerosene.
Dutchsinse has a satellite video showing simultaneous fires starting. I believe it’s on his YouTube channel.
I saw pictures on Twitter of helicopters flying low with flamethrowers starting fires.. Of course not sure of the accuracy.
I've seen these videos multiple times but some people with knowledge of forest fires have commented that this is a method of actually fighting these out of control fires. Supposedly it's a method of containment in some regard if you strategically set flame to certain areas.
It's a legit method of control; A fire needs three things to burn, those being flammable material, sufficient heat to ignite the material, and oxygen to accelerate the flame (producing more heat, which ignites surrounding material in an exponential growth as the fire's surface area increases).
A carefully controlled burn over an area in the path the fire is spreading in, ahead of that fire, helps prevent further spread by removing flammable material.
a fire break
Thank you for the technical term, I forgot it.
See how information that is real and true is confusing to people that aren't involved? The world is large and complex and what absolutely looks like one thing doesn't mean that's what it is. And that's fine. It's a big complex world. It's wrong to purposely confuse or waste people's time. It's good to educate and walk on confidently.
Only mentioned here because it's my pet peeve and it's wrecking people's lives being manipulated like that. I expect it from media companies, not "teammates".
In hindsight, I could have clarified that just because a controlled burn is a legitimate strategy, it does not necessarily mean that this is what is occurring.
Was wondering about that...like when they set control burns on the ground on an opposing perimeter so that the flames go towards each other and stop the fire.
https://twitter.com/CBKNEWS121/status/1666557336620498950?s=20
https://twitter.com/realstewpeters/status/1665906775097331715
Is this the video? Making a fire break?
It was this exact same video but on another account and now there is a message on the link like this one about back burns. Good digging fren! 👏
Anyone think of a reason to burn this area?
They're pushing climate change so they need to make it look like warming climate caused by humans is causing all the forests to burn down. They just started way to early in the season cause these people are stupid, now it's obvious that it's arson. Trudeau will trot out on the TV talking down ro canadians about how its our fault the forests are burning down since we drive cars or something and the only way to fix it is higher taxes.
CLIMATE CHANGE HYSTERIA
AGENDA 2030
https://atlantic.ctvnews.ca/federal-carbon-pricing-rolls-out-across-atlantic-canada-july-1-1.6382315 to justify raising the carbon tax in July.
Uranium.
May 23rd,2022.Nechalacho mine shipped it's first rare earths ?
I can think of one or two. The southernmost forests of Quebec are predominantly maple trees, but there's also a substantial coniferous-dominant region to the north. Coniferous needles produce toxic smoke due to the high concentration of terpenes.
Either maple syrup is going to get price gouged, or we can expect to eventually see large volumes of toxic smoke being blown down into New England by the winter trough winds.
Thugs playing with matches... I support the death penalty for people who start fires.
I can’t wait for that.