Jack Smith wants to deny Trump access to 84 witnesses. Judge Cannon smacks him down.
(threadreaderapp.com)
Comments (18)
sorted by:
She has only made one ruling that I don't like. Trump should not have been stopped from discussing the case.
Judge Cannon did not make that ruling. It was an Obama appointed Magistrate Bruce Reinhart.
Maybe he wanted it to be that way. Just a thought.
Anything is possible. Him being silenced is good theater for the masses, and may draw sympathy, but it misses a lot of opportunity to make his case directly to the people.
I am hoping his evidence at least is available for public view.
Also, it's a way to smoke out the moles and leaks.
I'm hoping it's a battle lost, so that when the war is won it won't look like inside deals.
Jack is coming in hot,, not sure he has as much traction as he thinks. Probably gonna spin out and hit the wall….
I do believe Jack Smith screwed the pooch on this one. Pretty sure by the end of this, they will have to drop charges or risk divulging the dirty deeds of the prior admin
Keep watching. The entirely of our government institutions, academia. media at national and state level have been infiltrated for many many years.
Hell Teddy Roosevelt said way back in 1909. "Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people. To destroy this invisible government, to befoul this unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the first task of the statesmanship of the day." That was 1909. How much worse do you imagine it gotten? Military didn't do anything back then and they aren't going to do anything now. Military is as corrupt as everyone else.
Ain't nobody coming to the rescue. It's up to us, is what my little voice keeps telling me.
What is the government? To whom is it responsive? Who are party to the contract?
The answers to these questions leads to another question: What is it do when the fabric of a constitutional republic is changed in favor of democracy? Compare amendment 10 to the 17th amendment.
victim classes + democracy = welfare by the state, centralism, governmentalism = loss of liberty and no security.
I sure as hell hope not. If the plan fails, and the military isn’t successful, the world has never seen a level of violence that will eventually beset this nation. Military is the ONLY way, my fren.
Imagine the OPINION of a single man/woman (judge) can decide the fate/life/future of another single man/woman. This is neither lawful, nor just.
It's exclusively a part of the LIEGE LORD (LEGAL) SYSTEM.
Rules for thee (serf), but not for me (lord)...
CUT !
I need a little more imagination.
lets try Jack Smithinsonian..
and.... ACTION !
I wish the smack down was for real, and with video streaming.
That's kind of funny. Like Trump would sign that...
Trump can’t discuss the case publicly but the DOJ can leak anything they want to the press and Trump can’t say a word about it. Communist shit.
Can someone tell me how to get in contact with a Mod? I've been a GAW patriot for years and a proud J6er, but this board will not let me reply to comments.
This is not true Trump will know the witnesses either way .
The issue is if the list will be public before the trial. Trump's lawyers didn't even oppose this.
She basically said there's no need to file this with the court right now. As long as the defense has the list, the court doesn't need it yet. It's a super mild ruling