Firstly, consider whether by name-calling you've entered an emotional, programmed state. Are you thinking for yourself or just emoting a program?
Was anything I said idiotic or untrue?
Watch the video. Listen like a lawyer. Tell me if I'm misquoting him:
“It will never cease to amaze me how far these Godless leftists media will go to run interference for human traffickers.
I saw a post that seems to be trending in certain places saying that I am in favor of putting microchips in children so we can track them.
It’s complete bologna! I’ve never weighed in on that, I’ve never said anything, in fact, I’m very much against anything that would allow the government or others to control children.”
I found out yesterday that apparently I’m involved in trafficking, I run trafficking networks, or that I’m some mason involved in strange Masonic practices…
It’s not gonna stop. Expect every lie. At this point, I have been accused of everything but murder, so I want you to just expect more to come, including probably that I’ve killed people, who knows?"
Is that--as you know and understand the English language--a direct denial that he's involved in trafficking and/or Masonic practices? Compare how he doesn't deny that with how he directly denies being in favor of putting microchips in children.
"...we have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics."
If a person cannot rationally discuss what a person said, and falls back to name calling and assumptions, I'd argue it is them who is in fact the blue haired liberal.
What one spends their limited and precious gifts of time "thinking" about and talking about is obviously a choice. However, Q pointed out repeatedly that choices are consequential.
Personally, since I'm bombarded constantly with psyop temptations vying for my attention, I'm glad that I gained a cursory understanding of a famous model for making decisions during a crisis.
This guidance is known as the Triage Decision Making Model.
Perhaps others will also find this easy to understand model to be helpful too.
Finally, even though I'm not a drinker, I still found AAs Serenity Prayer to be very useful since it trains people to distinguish between what they can control and what they cant.
The later category of things are the distractions our adversaries encourage people to focus on. Those things are what the bible, Q and AA encourage people to entrust to God.
You did not apply logic or critical thinking … you did a wrap up smear. You twisted his words and tried to extract some retarded distillation using the minced language tactic. You are either a Glowie, or a complete fucking idiot
You've already broken out the ad homs about four times now. But you should know or realize that logical fallacies hold no weight with conspiracy theorists. In fact, they undermine your position.
And to be clear, it's you who have twisted Ballards word to fit your motivation. I just took what he said at face value and made the observation that it fit the classic cabal non-denial pattern.
Again, consider why you're in such an emotional state. Can you reason soundly in this state?
Curious as to how you interpret two words in his tweet: “it” and “bologna.”
“It” refers to the entire lying campaign from the forces of darkness going against Tim (lies about chipping and murder and trafficking etc.) and all his hard work to bring awareness to human trafficking and to bring it DOWN.
“Bologna” is always used in the context of denying the absurd claims suggested.
When Tim said he found out that he is apparently involved in xyz, that, too, falls into the category of all of “it” being “bologna.”
Unless you have some lawyerly proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Tim is a swamp monster, you have no rational basis for even suggesting he’s anything less than a hero and a patriot. The burden of proof is on you.
This is your chance to prove (beyond reasonable doubt) Tim to be a liar or anything else swamp-like.
I think he's clearly referring to the microchips there, and directly refutes it.
People need to understand the joy the cabal feels when they can deceive us to our face. The highest form of their art is when they can trick us into hearing what we want to hear while they confess their crimes to us.
All I'm saying is that Ballard clearly just used that form of speech. It absolutely could have been done innocently, but we've seen the cabal use it in the past (think Bill Clinton and his definition of "sexual relations"). Be wary. Check your emotions at the door when doing analysis.
Firstly, consider whether by name-calling you've entered an emotional, programmed state. Are you thinking for yourself or just emoting a program?
Was anything I said idiotic or untrue?
Watch the video. Listen like a lawyer. Tell me if I'm misquoting him:
“It will never cease to amaze me how far these Godless leftists media will go to run interference for human traffickers.
I saw a post that seems to be trending in certain places saying that I am in favor of putting microchips in children so we can track them.
It’s complete bologna! I’ve never weighed in on that, I’ve never said anything, in fact, I’m very much against anything that would allow the government or others to control children.”
I found out yesterday that apparently I’m involved in trafficking, I run trafficking networks, or that I’m some mason involved in strange Masonic practices…
It’s not gonna stop. Expect every lie. At this point, I have been accused of everything but murder, so I want you to just expect more to come, including probably that I’ve killed people, who knows?"
Is that--as you know and understand the English language--a direct denial that he's involved in trafficking and/or Masonic practices? Compare how he doesn't deny that with how he directly denies being in favor of putting microchips in children.
Me thinks you are a Glowie.
Says the Glowie
Again, if you're in a state where you're name calling, consider if you're thinking for yourself or just running a program.
Is anything I stated untrue? As you understand the English language, did Ballard deny being involved in trafficking or Masonry?
You talk like a blue haired Liberal. Arrogant and condescending.
Ballard also didn't say he wasn't a bird, or a fish, or a Tranny. OHHH NOOO !!!!
"...we have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics."
If a person cannot rationally discuss what a person said, and falls back to name calling and assumptions, I'd argue it is them who is in fact the blue haired liberal.
What one spends their limited and precious gifts of time "thinking" about and talking about is obviously a choice. However, Q pointed out repeatedly that choices are consequential.
Personally, since I'm bombarded constantly with psyop temptations vying for my attention, I'm glad that I gained a cursory understanding of a famous model for making decisions during a crisis.
This guidance is known as the Triage Decision Making Model.
Perhaps others will also find this easy to understand model to be helpful too.
Finally, even though I'm not a drinker, I still found AAs Serenity Prayer to be very useful since it trains people to distinguish between what they can control and what they cant.
The later category of things are the distractions our adversaries encourage people to focus on. Those things are what the bible, Q and AA encourage people to entrust to God.
Pray for or prey on?
You did not apply logic or critical thinking … you did a wrap up smear. You twisted his words and tried to extract some retarded distillation using the minced language tactic. You are either a Glowie, or a complete fucking idiot
You've already broken out the ad homs about four times now. But you should know or realize that logical fallacies hold no weight with conspiracy theorists. In fact, they undermine your position.
And to be clear, it's you who have twisted Ballards word to fit your motivation. I just took what he said at face value and made the observation that it fit the classic cabal non-denial pattern.
Again, consider why you're in such an emotional state. Can you reason soundly in this state?
That pissed me off. Yes emotional response ignited - it's a very emotional topic -- EXACTLY the type of situation they love to use for manipulation
But I don't think he's a manipulator, just a person talking, not a demon twisting things.
Good to keep emotions out of stuff and just listen. The world is a powder keg right now and anything will be used to start it off.
Those against us want us pissed off and off center.
Stay alert and grounded.
Excellent summation.
Curious as to how you interpret two words in his tweet: “it” and “bologna.”
“It” refers to the entire lying campaign from the forces of darkness going against Tim (lies about chipping and murder and trafficking etc.) and all his hard work to bring awareness to human trafficking and to bring it DOWN.
“Bologna” is always used in the context of denying the absurd claims suggested.
When Tim said he found out that he is apparently involved in xyz, that, too, falls into the category of all of “it” being “bologna.”
Unless you have some lawyerly proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Tim is a swamp monster, you have no rational basis for even suggesting he’s anything less than a hero and a patriot. The burden of proof is on you.
This is your chance to prove (beyond reasonable doubt) Tim to be a liar or anything else swamp-like.
I think he's clearly referring to the microchips there, and directly refutes it.
People need to understand the joy the cabal feels when they can deceive us to our face. The highest form of their art is when they can trick us into hearing what we want to hear while they confess their crimes to us.
All I'm saying is that Ballard clearly just used that form of speech. It absolutely could have been done innocently, but we've seen the cabal use it in the past (think Bill Clinton and his definition of "sexual relations"). Be wary. Check your emotions at the door when doing analysis.
Stop deflecting.