I don't have the time to find it, but i recall coming across this years ago, and someone at the time rebuked it with the official video that didn't have the flashes. I'd have to dig it out again, but just be aware this is possibly a red-herring to discredit the years of research that point to WTC7 as being a likely demo.
I thought similar. "Miraculously found footage from an old camera." Uh huh.
However, even if it were debooonked using an "official video", would need to see them side-by-side to see if the "official video" is from the same time and also if the video is of the same side of the building, etc.
Nah, I'm sure that either the terrorists used the jet fuel that burns hot enough to melt steel beams in the foundations, or pulled an insane video game-like stunt and took down three buildings with two "planes" without them being lined up
Faked, it's Building 7 but video is flipped horizontally and the flash fx added.
The creator had a video showing how he made it on YT, don't know if it's still available. He was targeting 9-11 truthers as gullible.
It appears to be the same building you see on the newscast reporting it's destruction with the building in the background over the reporters shoulder. It is from the back side or opposite view of WTC building 7. Although I can't say I have seen this footage with the sound effects included.
I remember seeing a similar clip showing the flashes in the windows but from a wider angle or perhaps a further distance than this. This maybe digitally zoomed in view of the footage I had seen years ago.
So weird how they don’t show the entire computer simulation, because I’m certain it wouldn’t look like the controlled demolition that actually occurred.
100%, totally, for serious, "fell" down after being compromised by the other two towers falling.
I don't have the time to find it, but i recall coming across this years ago, and someone at the time rebuked it with the official video that didn't have the flashes. I'd have to dig it out again, but just be aware this is possibly a red-herring to discredit the years of research that point to WTC7 as being a likely demo.
I thought similar. "Miraculously found footage from an old camera." Uh huh.
However, even if it were debooonked using an "official video", would need to see them side-by-side to see if the "official video" is from the same time and also if the video is of the same side of the building, etc.
Good of you to call it out though. Discernment.
Nah, I'm sure that either the terrorists used the jet fuel that burns hot enough to melt steel beams in the foundations, or pulled an insane video game-like stunt and took down three buildings with two "planes" without them being lined up
Achievement Unlocked!
Three Stones with Two Birds
Well the magic bullet that killed Kennedy changed directions a couple times, so anything is possible.
/s 😒
Building 7 died of a broken heart and fell down after seeing the two main towers fall. Just like Padme in Episode III: Revenge of the Sith
/prompt: 9/11 gender reveal
This is so raycist
Faked, it's Building 7 but video is flipped horizontally and the flash fx added. The creator had a video showing how he made it on YT, don't know if it's still available. He was targeting 9-11 truthers as gullible.
It appears to be the same building you see on the newscast reporting it's destruction with the building in the background over the reporters shoulder. It is from the back side or opposite view of WTC building 7. Although I can't say I have seen this footage with the sound effects included.
I remember seeing a similar clip showing the flashes in the windows but from a wider angle or perhaps a further distance than this. This maybe digitally zoomed in view of the footage I had seen years ago.
This is clearly something a dangerously unhinged science denier would post.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PK_iBYSqEsc
So weird how they don’t show the entire computer simulation, because I’m certain it wouldn’t look like the controlled demolition that actually occurred.
I like how they can plant explosives in WTC 7 and bring it down in broad daylight
Far away from impact zones of WTC 1 and 2
And never think they'll have to have any reasonable explanation for it
Because no news media will ever care enough to pursue it
"Surely a whistle blower would've come forward... we would've heard about it." That's what they say, while discrediting whistleblowers.
They had to; to save our democracy.
Doctors are baffled???
Don't forget about the Nashville RV by the AT&T Building
I didn't forget.
In depth detailed analysis of Sept. 11 https://centerforaninformedamerica.com/september11/
These are some of the best 9/11 docs that I have found.
They will (and will not) answer a lot of questions.
.....
A New Pearl Harbor - aka 50 Questions They Can't Answer
https://www.bitchute.com/video/TaL4XxiFDnA9/
The Great American Psy Opera
https://www.bitchute.com/video/gfBqgZs7vdY2/
September Clues
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Vle9KDFKfWYN/
September Clues Addendum
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ogg17vKKxCCu/
They admitted to pulling it. No one has made them explain why and how they did that without the standard weeks of planning and setting explosives.
ae911truth.org