He needs to be in front of an unbiased judge (if any are left) and stand before a jury of his PEERS. No accountability for giving that man a mostly peaceful brain hemorrhage!!!! What a horrible system we live in.
Xactly. I was on a jury once. Third strike case, battery or some such. Many hispanics on the jury.
It was a fist fight over a girl. White guy vs hispanic. White guy won the fight. White guy was getting in his car and leaving. Hispanic ran and got his gang of friends and attacked the guy and his car.
All the hispanics on the jury thot it was completely justified that the dude went back and got his gang to attack the guy. No amount of reason could convince them that once the fight between only the two guys was over…it was over. That getting his friends and escalating the fight was what got him arrested.
Other jurors said, “Lets just vote to convict so we can go home.” At that point I lost my shit and said heatedly, “What if that was you or one of your family? He deserves a right for a fair discussion and trial.”
I realized at that moment that unless you have a jury of your peers…meaning same culture or income or job title or religion or something…it’s hopelessly broken. We need a new system.
(Imagine a child rape case with a certain demographic that has no issues with child brides?)
The jurors will remember this day and their decision when ANTIFA, BLM or illegal immigrants mercilessly beat them like Mr. NGO was beaten. This jury just gave violence carte Blanche.
Wow! Threatening the jury?
I mean...it is a war...
This is more telling of the judge than the lawyer.
This is Maoism on display for everyone to see, if you have eyes. Fight it while you are free. NOW
He needs to be in front of an unbiased judge (if any are left) and stand before a jury of his PEERS. No accountability for giving that man a mostly peaceful brain hemorrhage!!!! What a horrible system we live in.
Xactly. I was on a jury once. Third strike case, battery or some such. Many hispanics on the jury.
It was a fist fight over a girl. White guy vs hispanic. White guy won the fight. White guy was getting in his car and leaving. Hispanic ran and got his gang of friends and attacked the guy and his car.
All the hispanics on the jury thot it was completely justified that the dude went back and got his gang to attack the guy. No amount of reason could convince them that once the fight between only the two guys was over…it was over. That getting his friends and escalating the fight was what got him arrested.
Other jurors said, “Lets just vote to convict so we can go home.” At that point I lost my shit and said heatedly, “What if that was you or one of your family? He deserves a right for a fair discussion and trial.”
I realized at that moment that unless you have a jury of your peers…meaning same culture or income or job title or religion or something…it’s hopelessly broken. We need a new system.
(Imagine a child rape case with a certain demographic that has no issues with child brides?)
Agreed. And maybe a civics/morality test.
Not guilty.
Total miscarriage.
Portland is totally lost. The good people have all left now you have trash there.
You are sadly correct
The jurors will remember this day and their decision when ANTIFA, BLM or illegal immigrants mercilessly beat them like Mr. NGO was beaten. This jury just gave violence carte Blanche.
There was no objection by Andy's attorney? Wonder what the judge's instruction to the jury was.
Hey. He tried to do it the nice way. So from now on settle it in the streets.
Courts are cooked.