"Say what you want about Russell Brand but I've lurked on his channel at times and have found there to be a litany of red pills about Bill Gates, Big Pharma and the military industrial complex that some would consider over the target...
I haven't analyzed the allegations against him but they are now attempting to go back through his history and cancel him after he's gone against the narratives they want established...
Anyone else noticing an insane pattern?
Trump challenges the system and all of a sudden he's a racist sexual deviant but before no one said a word...
Justice Kavanaugh gives pushed Trump towards a majority in the Supreme Court so now he's a rapist but the woman doesn't remember the details and she's also connected to the CIA...
I could go on and on. The amount of hit jobs we see never seem to end. I'm not justifying promiscuous behavior but I am saying that as anons we see through the mainstream media...
The sheep only see what they want them to see. But we see through them after years of practice...
The people hiding Epstein Island's client are telling you that they are morally superior and you should cancel anyone who utters a semblance of truth. "
Bro. You’re a great contributor! And you’re right: listen and hear! This guy is not “on our side” because he’s his own man. He has a Ven Diagram overlap with this community and normies and liberals. He has a narrow focus on his podcast which is, at times, weak and effusive BUT he walks a fine line that Will Help reach people we can’t. He’s no shill. He is his OWN MAN and he’s not afraid to speak! I am quite surprised to find that in a character like RB. God bless him
If you wait 10-15 years to come out about sexual misconduct, then you weren't sexually abused. Like, I'm sorry if that sounds cruel to anyone here but timelines matter.
When you wait 10-15 years until an opportunity to pile on happens suddenly and out of nowhere, then you simply regretted it (not rape) or are looking for a paycheck (also not rape).
He holds liberal leaning views, but has not only wisened up over the years but actively came out against their agendas.
The world is rarely black and white, and the only reason the right and the left are so specifically opposed on every point is that they've created a situation where it is all or nothing.
Most people have one view or other that leans differently than their stated side.
The interesting thing to me is that Lefties and Righties can hold similar views but can remain so opposed.
Lefties think that Capitalism is the enemy because it makes some people very rich by exploiting others and those rich people take over the world and try to run it their way. Communism, they think will fix the situation. Righties, on the other hand, see people being exploited under Communism while the upper echelons seem to follow different rules. They amass piles of money while ruling the peasants.
In fact, both sides are seeing human nature at work and certain people are exploiting others to get rich. The system is immaterial but the Divide and Rule system is in play. Even though the rich oligarchs are the real problem one half of the population still fights the other on idealogical grounds with neither tackling the real problem of psychopathic oligarchs playing tyrant.
I think lefties are just addicted to outrage and drama. There is nuance to "capitalism bad" that they refuse to see; it doesn't help that they've been successfully bred not to question authorities.
Cronyism is the biggest threat to capitalism. Everyone knows unchecked capitalism is rife for exploitation, which is why we have laws against it -- but those laws are selectively enforced at all levels.
Microsoft buying massive video game publishers with an internal stated goal of muscling out their competition is one example where cronyism leads, as Innovation will end up being stifled at the current pace.
Of course, Amazon as well -- getting rates for two decades or whatever for shipping on the taxpayers' dime that made it extremely cost effective to destroy smaller shops and/or bring them to the Amazon marketplace so they get a cut.
Megacorps trying to consolidate and monopolize (or, yes, oligopolize) their respective industries while ravenously expanding into others to do the same absolutely should have been hit with antitrust. Microsoft in particular was hit with antitrust in the..90s I think? And the reasons for that are less impactful than where we are now.
It has become too easy to grease fingers, especially politicians who have learned that you can get legal bribery by having them simply lobby in favor of your pet projects.
But of course, none of this makes "capitalism bad". It just makes cronyism bad. As it turns out, those cronies are pushing a socialist-communist society on the world too.
Not a conservative. Rather a true centrist. He has lefty roots, but his key issues relate to the emergence of an elite and the destruction of true human freedom.
In the end, the old labels: left, right, conservative, liberal, etc, these are all a reflection of the dysfunctional realm of conflict under which the Cabal and their ilk have dominated and controlled humanity by fomenting conflict and using a divide and conquer approach.
The labels that will emerge more strongly and be functional in the future will be God-denying or God-affirming (not religion, note). Pro-freedom, pro-tyranny. Freedom vs Control. etc.
If we attach too strongly to the old labels, we'll become as irrelevant as the legacy news media. New wine needs new wine skins.
Brand has been dropping red pills for several years now. And its worth noting: almost everyone has a past.
We can all inherently sense evil when the enemy attempts to destroy by 'Bearing False Witness'. We can see this used against public figures that are not controlled. Bearing False Witness is their preferred go-to tactic for destroying people's lives. Projecting the crimes they committed onto those who expose them is 'bearing false witness'.
The most powerful words for rebuking this is by invoking the biblical commandments whenever God's Law is broken. It's that simple. It like using a stun gun and hitting the criminal with instant paralysis. Their tongues are bound and don't know how to respond. It's biblical.
For the life of me, I don't know why lawyers, politicians and the rest of us don't call out using the words of God's commandments, especially during this time of total deceit in politics today.
I pray Donald J. Trump will read this and will invoke these words of the 9th Commandment against those people bearing false witness against him. False accusations are Bearing False Witness and is the 9th Commandment of the Bible.
Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour. ( Exodus 20:16)
Seems like there's a pretty coordinated defense of Russell from the people you'd hope to see it from and a good counter redpill being dispensed by pointing out their tactics and their reliable dishonesty.
I really can not stand to see good people getting trashed by the cesspool of delusional leftist retarded morons too stupid to see the reality smacking them upside the head 24 hours a day.
If not for Paul, would there even have been a church? Would it have grown, or would it have been stamped out? Would it have spread through Rome to Europe and the West? Would it have stayed a small, limited faith?
I affirm a somewhat unorthodox (unusual?) view of Christian history.
Prior to Jesus' arrival, there were prophecies of the messiah coming and the messiah being a man of suffering, and there were also prophecies of him being a man of glory and sitting on David's own thrown.
Because of the cross (and indeed, Paul's own limited understanding) the former have been emphasized, and the latter said to refer to the second coming.
But scripture says (Jesus said) that "all the Prophets and the Law prophesied until John". Which really indicates that the dual nature of the prophecies regarding Jesus being a man of suffering or a man of glory both referred to the potential of Jesus' advent. Which potential would play out depending entirely on how the Israelites responded to Jesus.
As "the chosen" they were in a position to, as representatives of all mankind, to either accept Jesus and glorify him, or to reject him and necessitate the course of suffering (the cross). Examination of the scripture from this position yields a very different view of what took place, and that the cross was NOT inevitable, but a necessity required because, through faithlessness, the Jews rejected Jesus, and so he had to pay the price with his physical life.
(Note: Jesus could forgive sins BEFORE he was crucified).
What's the implication here? It is that Christianity was not the original preferred course God and Jesus wanted, but a result caused by faithlessness on the part of men.
And while Jesus gained the spiritual victory OVER that faithlessness through the crucifixion (so that all who believe in him are freed from that burden, and inherit his foundation), he paid the price of his flesh to do it.
So, Christianity began on an already limited foundation, destined only to be perfected when Christ returns. So while Paul spread Christianity to the Western world, and this expanded to the worldwide foundation of Christianity prior to 1900's, Paul's theology itself was necessarily limited. Jesus was unable to stay with Paul, and teach Paul, directly in person and raise his disciples to the level of understanding where he was able to "teach them many things" (but he could not when alive, because they cannot bear them at the time).
The scripture is perfect enough for its purpose, which is to prepare worldwide mankind to build a foundation to receive the second coming of the messiah, just as the purpose of the mosaic law was to prepare a people on the national level to receive the messiah.
But when Christ returns, the old and new testaments will be fulfilled in a final completed testament, where unlike in Paul's time (and in the time dominated by Paul's theology) we will see "Face to face" and "know even as we are known", instead of seeing as in a mirror darkly.
Just as all our parents are flawed, they nonetheless love us and give us the best that they could. Likewise, we should not judge Paul too harshly, but rather appreciate what he was able to accomplish for God and Jesus, given his (and the providence's) difficult situation where Jesus was not received but rejected, and where instead of living a long, fulfilling life teaching the people and raising them and establishing his own lineage on earth, Jesus instead had to pay the price of faithlessness, in order to open the path to spiritual salvation.
Even today, though we believe in the cross, yet our bodies are NOT redeemed, and they still legally belong to the devil. Which is why the world has remained under the control of evil, and evil has constantly infiltrated God's good foundation on Earth, despite the salvation of the Cross.
The divisions with the church are a direct result of the faithlessness of the Israelite forcing Jesus to fulfill the prophecy of suffering in order to redeem all mankind by payment of his flesh, and leave the work of building the foundation to his limited disciples, instead of being there in the physical world to direct it himself.
I told you this was an unorthodox view! But it is one that tempers a recognition of the limitations of Paul's legacy with recognition of the value he contributed, considering the extreme difficulty of the situation, where essentially, the entire foundation from Abraham to Jesus was lost because of the failure of the Israelites at the crucial time.
Thank you, and yes a little unorthodox BUT all that means is you don't agree with the consensus of the controlling bodies on this - i.e the churches, but in 1st Century the Pharisees, Scribes, etc. and one only needs to look at the conversations between Jesus and them to understand that they had gone astray from God's intentions.
I don't believe that either the failure of Israel nor the church was something which caught God out. He knew from the time of creation, and indeed as Jesus was the Lamb slain before the foundation of the world he made provision for our redemption.
The simple fact, IMHO, is that God desires our love (not to be confused with sloppy romantic love as many modern worship songs and preaching suggest), now He could have made us as robots programmed to return His love BUT that isn't what He desires at all. So He gave us free will but provided signposts along the way, so in the OT we end up with Talmudic Rabbinic worship of God and in NT Pauline Christianity - which is clearly different from Christ's Way.
The problem comes when both of these is that they end us as controlling organisations. 'I do not permit ...' says Paul, He suggests He received all this 'not from flesh and blood ...' but provides no evidence - in modern day parlance the Mormans have Joseph Smith and his 'golden tablets - only seen by him, and the established church calls this a cult! The problem with Paul, Rabbis and the like is you end up with a mixture of what God intended mixed with many philosophy - which never works, it is an apostacy.
To be clear as far as Paul is concerned I find many contradictions in things he wrote, and these are contrary to what the OT says, I find in places he misquotes or misapplies the OT scriptures, yet also says some profound things which do accord with the OT and relative to Jesus teaching. However if one espouses these in the church one is immediately condemned a heretic.
In the final analysis I believe that when Jesus returns - stone cut without hands - and established His worldwide rule we will indeed see the truth of the way God has called us to live. At which point two things will have happened - the New Covenant will be on the hearts and minds of those who will be priest and kings with Him, and we shall not sin however the unconverted at that time will still sin (Isaiah 65:20-25) - Paul terms this as 'the new creation' and 'corruption changed to incorruption'.
Secondly when we see the truth of 'the Way' which Jesus spoke of we shall indeed realise that we have needed God all along much more than our feeble minds ever thought, and that out human thoughts and ideas of worshipping our Creator were so wrong, and how we really needed Him to show us the right way. But more in order to get point and to ensure as many as will come to repentance do, as John writes:
John 1:12-13 ... as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, to those who believe in His name: who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.
"Say what you want about Russell Brand but I've lurked on his channel at times and have found there to be a litany of red pills about Bill Gates, Big Pharma and the military industrial complex that some would consider over the target...
I haven't analyzed the allegations against him but they are now attempting to go back through his history and cancel him after he's gone against the narratives they want established...
Anyone else noticing an insane pattern? Trump challenges the system and all of a sudden he's a racist sexual deviant but before no one said a word...
Justice Kavanaugh gives pushed Trump towards a majority in the Supreme Court so now he's a rapist but the woman doesn't remember the details and she's also connected to the CIA...
I could go on and on. The amount of hit jobs we see never seem to end. I'm not justifying promiscuous behavior but I am saying that as anons we see through the mainstream media...
The sheep only see what they want them to see. But we see through them after years of practice...
The people hiding Epstein Island's client are telling you that they are morally superior and you should cancel anyone who utters a semblance of truth. "
(ULTRA Pepe Lives Matter)
Meanwhile Ken Paxton goes after drug companies, and they attempt to impeach him.
What we need to other Red State AG's to grow some balls and start taking it to these criminals.
Bro. You’re a great contributor! And you’re right: listen and hear! This guy is not “on our side” because he’s his own man. He has a Ven Diagram overlap with this community and normies and liberals. He has a narrow focus on his podcast which is, at times, weak and effusive BUT he walks a fine line that Will Help reach people we can’t. He’s no shill. He is his OWN MAN and he’s not afraid to speak! I am quite surprised to find that in a character like RB. God bless him
If you wait 10-15 years to come out about sexual misconduct, then you weren't sexually abused. Like, I'm sorry if that sounds cruel to anyone here but timelines matter.
When you wait 10-15 years until an opportunity to pile on happens suddenly and out of nowhere, then you simply regretted it (not rape) or are looking for a paycheck (also not rape).
Yep, this metoo bullshit needs to fuck right off
I can’t see that guy hurting any woman.
I mean first, I didn't. Second, where are any allegations of sexual abuse against Pence? All heat on him seems to have disappeared entirely.
Russell is a Conservative and redpiller? Wow, how does anybody escape the clutches of the NWO in Hollywood? I guess it comes with a cost.
Russell is really a bit of a Lefty but the Red Pills have been getting to him!
He holds liberal leaning views, but has not only wisened up over the years but actively came out against their agendas.
The world is rarely black and white, and the only reason the right and the left are so specifically opposed on every point is that they've created a situation where it is all or nothing.
Most people have one view or other that leans differently than their stated side.
The interesting thing to me is that Lefties and Righties can hold similar views but can remain so opposed.
Lefties think that Capitalism is the enemy because it makes some people very rich by exploiting others and those rich people take over the world and try to run it their way. Communism, they think will fix the situation. Righties, on the other hand, see people being exploited under Communism while the upper echelons seem to follow different rules. They amass piles of money while ruling the peasants.
In fact, both sides are seeing human nature at work and certain people are exploiting others to get rich. The system is immaterial but the Divide and Rule system is in play. Even though the rich oligarchs are the real problem one half of the population still fights the other on idealogical grounds with neither tackling the real problem of psychopathic oligarchs playing tyrant.
I think lefties are just addicted to outrage and drama. There is nuance to "capitalism bad" that they refuse to see; it doesn't help that they've been successfully bred not to question authorities.
Cronyism is the biggest threat to capitalism. Everyone knows unchecked capitalism is rife for exploitation, which is why we have laws against it -- but those laws are selectively enforced at all levels.
Microsoft buying massive video game publishers with an internal stated goal of muscling out their competition is one example where cronyism leads, as Innovation will end up being stifled at the current pace.
Of course, Amazon as well -- getting rates for two decades or whatever for shipping on the taxpayers' dime that made it extremely cost effective to destroy smaller shops and/or bring them to the Amazon marketplace so they get a cut.
Megacorps trying to consolidate and monopolize (or, yes, oligopolize) their respective industries while ravenously expanding into others to do the same absolutely should have been hit with antitrust. Microsoft in particular was hit with antitrust in the..90s I think? And the reasons for that are less impactful than where we are now.
It has become too easy to grease fingers, especially politicians who have learned that you can get legal bribery by having them simply lobby in favor of your pet projects.
But of course, none of this makes "capitalism bad". It just makes cronyism bad. As it turns out, those cronies are pushing a socialist-communist society on the world too.
Those are the ones they cabal goes after 1st
Not a conservative. Rather a true centrist. He has lefty roots, but his key issues relate to the emergence of an elite and the destruction of true human freedom.
In the end, the old labels: left, right, conservative, liberal, etc, these are all a reflection of the dysfunctional realm of conflict under which the Cabal and their ilk have dominated and controlled humanity by fomenting conflict and using a divide and conquer approach.
The labels that will emerge more strongly and be functional in the future will be God-denying or God-affirming (not religion, note). Pro-freedom, pro-tyranny. Freedom vs Control. etc.
If we attach too strongly to the old labels, we'll become as irrelevant as the legacy news media. New wine needs new wine skins.
Brand has been dropping red pills for several years now. And its worth noting: almost everyone has a past.
Nice reply, fren. Thanks for taking the time and explain how things work in this world.
We can all inherently sense evil when the enemy attempts to destroy by 'Bearing False Witness'. We can see this used against public figures that are not controlled. Bearing False Witness is their preferred go-to tactic for destroying people's lives. Projecting the crimes they committed onto those who expose them is 'bearing false witness'.
The most powerful words for rebuking this is by invoking the biblical commandments whenever God's Law is broken. It's that simple. It like using a stun gun and hitting the criminal with instant paralysis. Their tongues are bound and don't know how to respond. It's biblical.
For the life of me, I don't know why lawyers, politicians and the rest of us don't call out using the words of God's commandments, especially during this time of total deceit in politics today.
I pray Donald J. Trump will read this and will invoke these words of the 9th Commandment against those people bearing false witness against him. False accusations are Bearing False Witness and is the 9th Commandment of the Bible.
Seems like there's a pretty coordinated defense of Russell from the people you'd hope to see it from and a good counter redpill being dispensed by pointing out their tactics and their reliable dishonesty.
I really can not stand to see good people getting trashed by the cesspool of delusional leftist retarded morons too stupid to see the reality smacking them upside the head 24 hours a day.
https://www.rt.com/news/583070-russell-brand-sexual-assault-allegations/
Dr. Nefario FTW
Paul hunted and kills Christians.
Have a nice day.
And in the process filled the church with so many conflicting doctrines that we are not a untied body!
True, but perspective is very important here.
If not for Paul, would there even have been a church? Would it have grown, or would it have been stamped out? Would it have spread through Rome to Europe and the West? Would it have stayed a small, limited faith?
I affirm a somewhat unorthodox (unusual?) view of Christian history.
Prior to Jesus' arrival, there were prophecies of the messiah coming and the messiah being a man of suffering, and there were also prophecies of him being a man of glory and sitting on David's own thrown.
Because of the cross (and indeed, Paul's own limited understanding) the former have been emphasized, and the latter said to refer to the second coming.
But scripture says (Jesus said) that "all the Prophets and the Law prophesied until John". Which really indicates that the dual nature of the prophecies regarding Jesus being a man of suffering or a man of glory both referred to the potential of Jesus' advent. Which potential would play out depending entirely on how the Israelites responded to Jesus.
As "the chosen" they were in a position to, as representatives of all mankind, to either accept Jesus and glorify him, or to reject him and necessitate the course of suffering (the cross). Examination of the scripture from this position yields a very different view of what took place, and that the cross was NOT inevitable, but a necessity required because, through faithlessness, the Jews rejected Jesus, and so he had to pay the price with his physical life.
(Note: Jesus could forgive sins BEFORE he was crucified).
What's the implication here? It is that Christianity was not the original preferred course God and Jesus wanted, but a result caused by faithlessness on the part of men.
And while Jesus gained the spiritual victory OVER that faithlessness through the crucifixion (so that all who believe in him are freed from that burden, and inherit his foundation), he paid the price of his flesh to do it.
So, Christianity began on an already limited foundation, destined only to be perfected when Christ returns. So while Paul spread Christianity to the Western world, and this expanded to the worldwide foundation of Christianity prior to 1900's, Paul's theology itself was necessarily limited. Jesus was unable to stay with Paul, and teach Paul, directly in person and raise his disciples to the level of understanding where he was able to "teach them many things" (but he could not when alive, because they cannot bear them at the time).
The scripture is perfect enough for its purpose, which is to prepare worldwide mankind to build a foundation to receive the second coming of the messiah, just as the purpose of the mosaic law was to prepare a people on the national level to receive the messiah.
But when Christ returns, the old and new testaments will be fulfilled in a final completed testament, where unlike in Paul's time (and in the time dominated by Paul's theology) we will see "Face to face" and "know even as we are known", instead of seeing as in a mirror darkly.
Just as all our parents are flawed, they nonetheless love us and give us the best that they could. Likewise, we should not judge Paul too harshly, but rather appreciate what he was able to accomplish for God and Jesus, given his (and the providence's) difficult situation where Jesus was not received but rejected, and where instead of living a long, fulfilling life teaching the people and raising them and establishing his own lineage on earth, Jesus instead had to pay the price of faithlessness, in order to open the path to spiritual salvation.
Even today, though we believe in the cross, yet our bodies are NOT redeemed, and they still legally belong to the devil. Which is why the world has remained under the control of evil, and evil has constantly infiltrated God's good foundation on Earth, despite the salvation of the Cross.
The divisions with the church are a direct result of the faithlessness of the Israelite forcing Jesus to fulfill the prophecy of suffering in order to redeem all mankind by payment of his flesh, and leave the work of building the foundation to his limited disciples, instead of being there in the physical world to direct it himself.
I told you this was an unorthodox view! But it is one that tempers a recognition of the limitations of Paul's legacy with recognition of the value he contributed, considering the extreme difficulty of the situation, where essentially, the entire foundation from Abraham to Jesus was lost because of the failure of the Israelites at the crucial time.
Thank you, and yes a little unorthodox BUT all that means is you don't agree with the consensus of the controlling bodies on this - i.e the churches, but in 1st Century the Pharisees, Scribes, etc. and one only needs to look at the conversations between Jesus and them to understand that they had gone astray from God's intentions.
I don't believe that either the failure of Israel nor the church was something which caught God out. He knew from the time of creation, and indeed as Jesus was the Lamb slain before the foundation of the world he made provision for our redemption.
The simple fact, IMHO, is that God desires our love (not to be confused with sloppy romantic love as many modern worship songs and preaching suggest), now He could have made us as robots programmed to return His love BUT that isn't what He desires at all. So He gave us free will but provided signposts along the way, so in the OT we end up with Talmudic Rabbinic worship of God and in NT Pauline Christianity - which is clearly different from Christ's Way.
The problem comes when both of these is that they end us as controlling organisations. 'I do not permit ...' says Paul, He suggests He received all this 'not from flesh and blood ...' but provides no evidence - in modern day parlance the Mormans have Joseph Smith and his 'golden tablets - only seen by him, and the established church calls this a cult! The problem with Paul, Rabbis and the like is you end up with a mixture of what God intended mixed with many philosophy - which never works, it is an apostacy.
To be clear as far as Paul is concerned I find many contradictions in things he wrote, and these are contrary to what the OT says, I find in places he misquotes or misapplies the OT scriptures, yet also says some profound things which do accord with the OT and relative to Jesus teaching. However if one espouses these in the church one is immediately condemned a heretic.
In the final analysis I believe that when Jesus returns - stone cut without hands - and established His worldwide rule we will indeed see the truth of the way God has called us to live. At which point two things will have happened - the New Covenant will be on the hearts and minds of those who will be priest and kings with Him, and we shall not sin however the unconverted at that time will still sin (Isaiah 65:20-25) - Paul terms this as 'the new creation' and 'corruption changed to incorruption'.
Secondly when we see the truth of 'the Way' which Jesus spoke of we shall indeed realise that we have needed God all along much more than our feeble minds ever thought, and that out human thoughts and ideas of worshipping our Creator were so wrong, and how we really needed Him to show us the right way. But more in order to get point and to ensure as many as will come to repentance do, as John writes:
John 1:12-13 ... as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, to those who believe in His name: who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.
My Unorthodoxy
Thanks for sharing your unorthodoxy.
https://nitter.net/TuckerCarlson/status/1703043235466076541