British Parliament Demands Rumble Video Platform Remove or Demonetize Russell Brand – Rumble Says NO! - Good on them!
(theconservativetreehouse.com)
Comments (24)
sorted by:
For the record I am not a big fan of Russel Brand whatsoever... I still look at him concerned is he really fully out of the clutches of the WEF, katy parry and all that rot... he is no Julian Assange but look carefully at why we don't have Julian in the battle any more...
Many may not remember this. Julian Assange was suddenly accused of rape after he began exposing government abuse of power, fraud and corruption via Wikileaks. One woman said she was 'half asleep.' Just like Russell Brand, the corrupt media convicted him before any court hearing. It's always the same story. You go against the establishment, you are about to become a Supreme Court Justice or President of the United States, you're a famous person with a lot of money and influence, the mainstream media comes up with allegations of rape. And even before any court hearing, they convict you. They talk about these allegations day and night as if they could not be false, they smear you so badly that you're almost guilty until proven innocent. The allegations often go back decades. When you get to court, they would say the accuser should not be cross-examined because of privacy concerns. The accuser can try to destroy a famous person but they cannot be cross-examined? How does that work? Of course, no one supports any physical or sexual assault of a woman or a man, everyone is against it. But it's interesting how this is always reported when you're against the establishment, or belong to the wrong political party. Right now, Assange is still being detained, not because of any rape, not because he lied against any government, but because he told the truth. He exposed the government and they are killing him, they want him to die in detention. The advocates of free speech are actually against any transparency, against any free speech. May God help us!
Playbook known. They use the rape accusation play because they know it will resonate with the 50% plus female voting block and a good percentage of the male voters as well - I'm not too sure how it plays with the "other" genders because I ain't bat-shit crazy. Discredit the messenger, discredit the message. Good on Rumble for standing their ground and keeping RB on the air - their stock took a hit this week (down like 12%) but I think standing for free speech and providing a platform where "innocent until proven guilty" still applies will do them (RUM) well moving forward.
I don't agree with your statistics.
I think a majority of the population is sick of the false accusations - especially decades old.
To me, the fair thing would be false accusations carry the same penalty as rape.
I disagree with your disagreement, so there. I said "resonate" - not that they would automatically agree with it but they'll pay attention to it. Accuse RB of insider trading and MOST people would not give a crap or even remember hearing about it - accuse him of rape and the suspicion of him being a rapist will hang over him for the rest of his life with a certain percentage of people, no matter how false the accusation is proven to be.
As Rush used to say, 'it's not about whether it's true or not, it's about the seriousness of the charge.'
They've been using this same play for decades now. Whatever the charge is, the drive-by media will always dutifully play their part.
I never thought he was or is funny but since he sobered up and says he got his life in order, he puts out some pretty good and credible facts. They would not be going after him this hard if he was not getting close to the target, hope he makes it through this. Alive
If you go conservative and or anti-narrative they'll cancel you. I suspect John Campbell will be next.
John Campbell British Internet personality and YouTuber John Lorimer Campbell is an English YouTuber and retired nurse educator known for his videos about the COVID-19 pandemic. Initially, the videos received praise, but they later veered into misinformation. He has been criticised for suggesting COVID-19 deaths have been over-counted, repeating
That's what you get in a big unsolicited box on the right hand side if you search for him. Wikipedia is FUCKING EVIL.
Go Rumble!
Dear England, go fuck yourself.
They salted about 1776 long time
I'm missing the "innocent until proven guilty" part.
"Where he issued his pre-emptive response to the accusations made against him by The Sunday Times and Channel 4's Dispatches."
There is so much wrong with this statement alone I barely know where to start.
If the accusations against him were made, then his response is hardly pre-emptive now is it?
Also, he has been accused by elements of the MSM and a government representative is apparently using this as if it had the legitimacy of a court of law.
Wow, just wow.
Send them a copy of the Declaration of Independence.
Let the exodus from YouTube to Rumble begin! Smart creators have been migrating over for the last few years. Even Brand a year or two ago stated he was joining both to avoid total deplatforming.
We are Lucky 1776 happened.
Get bent!
Buy Rumble stock
Now they put further pressure on Rumble... never never never quite... https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/09/22/russell-brand-issues-statement-after-british-govt-target-him-for-removal-from-social-media-platforms/
Isn't Rumble BlackRock owned?
Edit: why downvote if it's factually true and irrefutable. The question is how much of a percentage but they are a large shareholder.
Well, small amount. Along with the other usual suspects.
State Street, Vanguard and the big mutual funds. https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/RUM/holders/
you are blocked for unsubstantiated claims!