My investigation suggests the story we have been told about America's founding, the Constitution, the Founding Fathers, etc., is complete hogwash. Our "history" is a fabrication of "good" and "freedom" given to justify something so insidious, it's almost impossible to believe. This isn't, nor has it ever been, "the land of the free," it is the "land of the completely brainwashed."
Digging into Franklin is a great example of this. His background story is total bullshit. So much necessary context is left out of the official version, and we think of the facts stated in terms of the context of today, or along the lines of the rhetoric presented. This method of story telling paints a false picture.
For example, Franklin is presented as coming from humble beginnings. Nothing could be further from the truth. His father owned a big candle making business. History paints it as a "lowly" profession (candle making) but the context left out is that Franklin's father wasn't just a "candle maker" he was the owner of a large profitable business. He had many employees. He was also a local magistrate. Not for the legal structure of the town, but for the Church. The context left out is that the Church WAS the legal structure of the town in the 17th and 18th centuries in New England.
Ben is said to have "not gone to school," and been "self taught." Bullshit. According to the narrative he went to Boston Latin School for a year and had a private tutor for a year. He then went into a printing apprenticeship. The context that is left out of his "self-taught" education is that the school he went to, Boston Latin School, was a school for the Elite. No one but the top of society could go there, and no one but the top of society could afford a private tutor. He likely did take over his own education, but that was almost certainly because he was smart as fuck and he had access to all the books he needed to teach himself, not because the opportunities didn't exist for him to go to school. Indeed, his father had wanted him to become a Minister, like his grandfather. The context left out of that is that a Minister meant going to college. ALL MINISTERS of that time period were from the top of society. Less than 1% of people went to college, and only those born to the "right" families. That opportunity was there for him, even though he didn't take it. That is not an opportunity afforded to anyone but the top of society.
A printing apprenticeship was one of the hardest guilds to get in to. Not only did you already have to know Latin going in (thus restricted to only those with enough education at a young age), but "printers" weren't just people who printed whatever anyone wanted, they were the News Media of the day. They chose what to print, what people saw, what propaganda was shown. They were The News. The printers trade was only afforded to select people, but both Benjamin Franklin and his brother James were printers (he was apprenticed to his brother James).
Franklin was born high, his parents were born high, his grand parents were born high, etc. We look at these things in the context of today, where everyone gets an education (Rockefeller's brainwashing institution), or where being a Minister is not an Elite profession, or without understanding exactly what a printing apprenticeship is. Once you start digging in, and you start comparing the life of these "humble beginnings" people to the opportunities afforded to the other 99% of the population at the time, you see that it's all complete bullshit. Everyone in our history is a member of the One Percent. EVERYONE. They are all members of the Aristocracy, from birth. no matter how low they are placed in "official history."
This little dive into Franklin doesn't even touch on the fact that recent digging in his house found the bodies of children in the cellar, or numerous other little tidbits that shouldn't exist for an "American Hero." I do not think Benjamin Franklin was a very good guy at all, but the Narrative needs heroes, and Ben got to become one of them. I think he was a hero; a hero of the Cabal.
Ben’s aunt… was prominent in the Salem trials, being a primary accuser of Rebecca Nurse, Martha Corey and John Proctor, all of whom were allegedly hanged. So that's what Ben's family was involved in at the time. They don't teach you that in history class, do they?
Great post. Now do the Confederacy. They were the “good guys” but we were taught in school that they were only fighting to keep their slaves; even though only a small fraction of society actually owned slaves. We were never taught the truth about the real Dishonest Abe or his crushing tariffs on the Southern states.
I agree with this. And the next level of understanding from that is exploring why the Russian Tsar sent his navy to the US coast and told European countries that an attack on the Union would be war against Russia. Was it bankers using the Confederacy in the same way they run color revolutions now, to disrupt the status quo so they can move in and take even more power?
I’m not denigrating the Confederacy nor glorifying the Union by saying this, any more than I think Black Lives don’t Matter, understand. I’m saying it’s elites cynically (creating and) using social turmoil to their ends.
The Confederacy was not the good guys. They were just the other bad guys, the controlled opposition. Yes, they were fighting for State Rights. Yes, it wasn't primarily about slavery, and Abe was almost certainly a willing agent of the Cabal. But the Confederacy was also funded by family Rothschild, doing exactly what they were supposed to do, controlled in exactly the same way as the Yanks.
You may very well be right. It’s a shame we are not taught that the South was pushed too far just like Americans as a whole today are being pushed to their limit. Hell, it’s global to be honest. Regardless of the goings on behind the scenes, the South was invaded. They didn’t want war and the average Northern soldier didn’t either. The people didn’t have bad intentions. The politicians screwed them then just like they do now. Propaganda had to have been super easy back then.
In my opinion, the grievances Americans hold today outweigh the causes of secession from first the British Crown and then the South from the North. The trespasses on us are very similar but worse in many cases. We even have quartering today. Illegal aliens instead of soldiers.
To your point, I would not doubt one bit that Judah Benjamin was a Rothschild puppet. He turned tail and fled for England when the job was done.
My research suggests there has not been a single war, anywhere in the world, for at least three centuries that was not run, both sides, by the Cabal.
Propaganda had to have been super easy back then.
It was. It is even easier now. They only got better as time went on, with more avenues to exploit.
They didn’t want war and the average Northern soldier didn’t either.
The peoplenever want war. Why would anyone care about what other people are doing a thousand miles away from their home, or ten thousand? The answer is, they don't. The people have to worry about feeding their family, or fixing the barn, etc. If it doesn't have any impact on their life, people don't care very much, no matter what is going on. So how do people become motivated to travel thousands of miles to go murder other people in their homes? The PTB, through propaganda, create a belief in a future impact. If you believe you are under imminent threat, you will go murder other people in their homes. If you further believe your cause is holy or righteous then you will be very motivated to go kill people in their homes.
Of course not everyone will be sufficiently motivated by that propaganda, that's what conscription is for, but creating the belief in a righteous cause and/or imminent danger is an essential first step that helps even the conscripted to swallow the pill. Those efforts of belief creation are always done by the Cabal first, and it is always a lie, based on a partial truth. For the North, it was the belief in abolishing slavery. For the South, it was the belief in defending States Rights. Both were true, albeit not necessarily as true as the people were led to believe.
When you look at any war you can find such propaganda for belief creation (usually on both sides) going back forever. When you look at who is creating those beliefs, it always leads back to the same group of people for every war in at least the past three centuries, with many wars having clear leads to the same group going much further back than that (Crusades e.g.). As it turns out, the people who create the propaganda also happen to be the same people that fund the wars, on both sides.
IDK about the 1700's but in the early 1900's Boston Latin was for the smartest kids of any background, rich or poor. I know a son of poor immigrants that went there. He was just very smart.
In the early 1900s Rockefeller had already begun his program to open up schools and create scholarship programs to "harvest the geniuses." It was still largely "Aristocrat only," but there were exceptions by that time. By the 1930s, school admittance, for most schools anyways, had become pretty much a true meritocracy, though it still had aristocratic leanings, and it still does.
I don't believe it for a second. I'm sure all the founding fathers had plenty of flaws, but they served their republic far better than the liberators of South America.
If the founding fathers and those who supported them were less than extraordinary, the USA would today be in the same conditions as the United States of Mexico (yes, that's the country's official name), or the various countries liberated by Simón Bolívar, tilting from right-wing strongman to left-wing socialist junta. Our country is exceptional, and was guided by freedom-loving visionaries, regardless of their human flaws.
The stories may have plenty of padding, but the proof is in the pudding. The USA's early years were a clear break, a far cry from fully controlled puppet states. The cabal required constant and multi-generational infiltration to regain the control they have now, and are about to lose.
I suggest perhaps "You don't believe it for a second" because you haven't seen the evidence. There is a metric fuckton of evidence to support my statements. So much in fact it requires books and books of information. But let's start with something really simple. Let's look at the fifth amendment:
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger
To paraphrase, "no one will be held without due process, EXCEPT in actual service in time of war OR if the public is in danger." In other words, anyone in the military or militia WILL be subject to being held without due process, anytime there is an assessment of "public danger". Public danger is the same as "National Security," which is whatever those in charge believe it is at the time. It is subject to the whims of those in charge. In addition, we have been at war all but 16 years of this country, so the "national security" excuse isn't even required, but it's there if they want it to be. This says explicitly that every single person in the military has NO RIGHTS, and is completely subject to the whims of those in charge of the government.
Now rectify that with the draft. Military service at the time was not optional. Technically, that is still true, though there have been changes to the constitution (14th amendment specifically) that made everyone a slave, so this part of the fifth amendment is really redundant. I am making the case for it being there from the beginning however, so I am focusing on this.
Women didn't really have any rights under Constitutional law at the time (though they had some under common law). Men in the military had no rights, and military service for all men was not optional anytime the PTB willed it. That doesn't mean there weren't plenty of people believing they had rights that the government couldn't take away, but this provides a legal path to take them away on the whims of those in charge. That they only chose to exercise those rights sometimes** doesn't mean the legal path wasn't in there from the beginning.
** For example, George Washington forced (they had no choice) all of his men to be inoculated with small pox, and 3% of them died
To continue:
nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law
This says that a person WILL be deprived of life, liberty, or property if "due process of law" deems it necessary. OK, but who determines those laws? Who determines what "due process" is? Who determines what you can or can't do? Is it We The People? No, it is the people who run the Government.
"But "We The People" are the government!"
Are we?
In the beginning, the only people who could even vote for who would be America's King and court (we call them "President" and "Congress," but from a legal perspective, they are identical to King and Court), were wealthy land owners, AKA the Aristocracy. The Government was created and run by the Aristocrats from the beginning. The vast majority of people had no say at all. Men who didn't own land (the majority of the populace), women, wage laborers, apprentices, indentured servants, slaves, etc. had no say whatsoever in who ran the country. And then everyone was subject to the whims of whichever elected Aristocrat got the most campaign money and support from the media, both of which were controlled by the Cabal, then as now.
Importantly, the rest of We The People had no choice but to follow this system. You can't "opt out" of the Government if you think it's Tyrannical. There is no exit clause. It was designed that way on purpose. The people who signed the Treaty we call the Constitution signed for everyone. What about those who didn't want that? They had no say. They had no Rights. They were forced to be subjects to the Government, and their "due process." These things were, from the beginning, subject to the whims of the people in charge.
Whether you think people should be (whether they want to be or not) subjects to the Government (really, they are, legally speaking, subjects (vassals) to the people who run the government) is not the point. My point is the LEGAL STRUCTURE of the system, and the systems that enforce it through coercion (police, DOJ, etc.), gives people no choice.
nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
This states explicitly that you do not own your property. The Government, or rather the people in charge of the government, can take your property any time they want. Your "ownership" of property is subject to the whims of those in charge. Who really owns your property if someone can take it away whenever they want, and there is nothing you can do about it?
This is just a sample of all the Individual Rights violations contained in the founding documents and subsequent laws of the "Founding Fathers." There is so much more. No one knows, because no one looks. We believe what we have been taught about history from schools that were created by John D. Rockefeller, written by books that were commissioned by the Rockefeller Foundation and the General Education Board (created by Rockefeller), and then taken over by the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare which was created by Nelson Rockefeller. See a pattern?
Everything you learned about history and government from your United States education was approved by the Cabal.
My investigation suggests the story we have been told about America's founding, the Constitution, the Founding Fathers, etc., is complete hogwash. Our "history" is a fabrication of "good" and "freedom" given to justify something so insidious, it's almost impossible to believe. This isn't, nor has it ever been, "the land of the free," it is the "land of the completely brainwashed."
Digging into Franklin is a great example of this. His background story is total bullshit. So much necessary context is left out of the official version, and we think of the facts stated in terms of the context of today, or along the lines of the rhetoric presented. This method of story telling paints a false picture.
For example, Franklin is presented as coming from humble beginnings. Nothing could be further from the truth. His father owned a big candle making business. History paints it as a "lowly" profession (candle making) but the context left out is that Franklin's father wasn't just a "candle maker" he was the owner of a large profitable business. He had many employees. He was also a local magistrate. Not for the legal structure of the town, but for the Church. The context left out is that the Church WAS the legal structure of the town in the 17th and 18th centuries in New England.
Ben is said to have "not gone to school," and been "self taught." Bullshit. According to the narrative he went to Boston Latin School for a year and had a private tutor for a year. He then went into a printing apprenticeship. The context that is left out of his "self-taught" education is that the school he went to, Boston Latin School, was a school for the Elite. No one but the top of society could go there, and no one but the top of society could afford a private tutor. He likely did take over his own education, but that was almost certainly because he was smart as fuck and he had access to all the books he needed to teach himself, not because the opportunities didn't exist for him to go to school. Indeed, his father had wanted him to become a Minister, like his grandfather. The context left out of that is that a Minister meant going to college. ALL MINISTERS of that time period were from the top of society. Less than 1% of people went to college, and only those born to the "right" families. That opportunity was there for him, even though he didn't take it. That is not an opportunity afforded to anyone but the top of society.
A printing apprenticeship was one of the hardest guilds to get in to. Not only did you already have to know Latin going in (thus restricted to only those with enough education at a young age), but "printers" weren't just people who printed whatever anyone wanted, they were the News Media of the day. They chose what to print, what people saw, what propaganda was shown. They were The News. The printers trade was only afforded to select people, but both Benjamin Franklin and his brother James were printers (he was apprenticed to his brother James).
Franklin was born high, his parents were born high, his grand parents were born high, etc. We look at these things in the context of today, where everyone gets an education (Rockefeller's brainwashing institution), or where being a Minister is not an Elite profession, or without understanding exactly what a printing apprenticeship is. Once you start digging in, and you start comparing the life of these "humble beginnings" people to the opportunities afforded to the other 99% of the population at the time, you see that it's all complete bullshit. Everyone in our history is a member of the One Percent. EVERYONE. They are all members of the Aristocracy, from birth. no matter how low they are placed in "official history."
This little dive into Franklin doesn't even touch on the fact that recent digging in his house found the bodies of children in the cellar, or numerous other little tidbits that shouldn't exist for an "American Hero." I do not think Benjamin Franklin was a very good guy at all, but the Narrative needs heroes, and Ben got to become one of them. I think he was a hero; a hero of the Cabal.
Lots of other goodies about Ben in this paper: http://mileswmathis.com/ben.pdf
Second sentence of the link
.
We will start with his genealogy,
.
I feel an anti-jew rant coming.
.
.It's the jooooos .......... gets tiring.
so do people who write jooooooos
Good thing I only use 5 o's.
Those 7 o bastards are the worst.
I'm certain there are people who come here to spread anti-Jew dogma and haven't even read any Q posts.
It’s funny how it keeps working out that way isn’t it
Franklin's address was 36 Craven. 3-6, 666 etc
That is easy to believe. They were the only ones educated.
Great post. Now do the Confederacy. They were the “good guys” but we were taught in school that they were only fighting to keep their slaves; even though only a small fraction of society actually owned slaves. We were never taught the truth about the real Dishonest Abe or his crushing tariffs on the Southern states.
History is taught by the victor.
I agree with this. And the next level of understanding from that is exploring why the Russian Tsar sent his navy to the US coast and told European countries that an attack on the Union would be war against Russia. Was it bankers using the Confederacy in the same way they run color revolutions now, to disrupt the status quo so they can move in and take even more power?
I’m not denigrating the Confederacy nor glorifying the Union by saying this, any more than I think Black Lives don’t Matter, understand. I’m saying it’s elites cynically (creating and) using social turmoil to their ends.
It’s always bankers fren.
The Confederacy was not the good guys. They were just the other bad guys, the controlled opposition. Yes, they were fighting for State Rights. Yes, it wasn't primarily about slavery, and Abe was almost certainly a willing agent of the Cabal. But the Confederacy was also funded by family Rothschild, doing exactly what they were supposed to do, controlled in exactly the same way as the Yanks.
The House always wins.
You may very well be right. It’s a shame we are not taught that the South was pushed too far just like Americans as a whole today are being pushed to their limit. Hell, it’s global to be honest. Regardless of the goings on behind the scenes, the South was invaded. They didn’t want war and the average Northern soldier didn’t either. The people didn’t have bad intentions. The politicians screwed them then just like they do now. Propaganda had to have been super easy back then.
In my opinion, the grievances Americans hold today outweigh the causes of secession from first the British Crown and then the South from the North. The trespasses on us are very similar but worse in many cases. We even have quartering today. Illegal aliens instead of soldiers.
To your point, I would not doubt one bit that Judah Benjamin was a Rothschild puppet. He turned tail and fled for England when the job was done.
In the end, most wars are banker’s wars.
FTFY
My research suggests there has not been a single war, anywhere in the world, for at least three centuries that was not run, both sides, by the Cabal.
It was. It is even easier now. They only got better as time went on, with more avenues to exploit.
The people never want war. Why would anyone care about what other people are doing a thousand miles away from their home, or ten thousand? The answer is, they don't. The people have to worry about feeding their family, or fixing the barn, etc. If it doesn't have any impact on their life, people don't care very much, no matter what is going on. So how do people become motivated to travel thousands of miles to go murder other people in their homes? The PTB, through propaganda, create a belief in a future impact. If you believe you are under imminent threat, you will go murder other people in their homes. If you further believe your cause is holy or righteous then you will be very motivated to go kill people in their homes.
Of course not everyone will be sufficiently motivated by that propaganda, that's what conscription is for, but creating the belief in a righteous cause and/or imminent danger is an essential first step that helps even the conscripted to swallow the pill. Those efforts of belief creation are always done by the Cabal first, and it is always a lie, based on a partial truth. For the North, it was the belief in abolishing slavery. For the South, it was the belief in defending States Rights. Both were true, albeit not necessarily as true as the people were led to believe.
When you look at any war you can find such propaganda for belief creation (usually on both sides) going back forever. When you look at who is creating those beliefs, it always leads back to the same group of people for every war in at least the past three centuries, with many wars having clear leads to the same group going much further back than that (Crusades e.g.). As it turns out, the people who create the propaganda also happen to be the same people that fund the wars, on both sides.
I lagree, the "Great Experiment" isn't what we thought.
IDK about the 1700's but in the early 1900's Boston Latin was for the smartest kids of any background, rich or poor. I know a son of poor immigrants that went there. He was just very smart.
In the early 1900s Rockefeller had already begun his program to open up schools and create scholarship programs to "harvest the geniuses." It was still largely "Aristocrat only," but there were exceptions by that time. By the 1930s, school admittance, for most schools anyways, had become pretty much a true meritocracy, though it still had aristocratic leanings, and it still does.
I don't believe it for a second. I'm sure all the founding fathers had plenty of flaws, but they served their republic far better than the liberators of South America.
If the founding fathers and those who supported them were less than extraordinary, the USA would today be in the same conditions as the United States of Mexico (yes, that's the country's official name), or the various countries liberated by Simón Bolívar, tilting from right-wing strongman to left-wing socialist junta. Our country is exceptional, and was guided by freedom-loving visionaries, regardless of their human flaws.
The stories may have plenty of padding, but the proof is in the pudding. The USA's early years were a clear break, a far cry from fully controlled puppet states. The cabal required constant and multi-generational infiltration to regain the control they have now, and are about to lose.
I suggest perhaps "You don't believe it for a second" because you haven't seen the evidence. There is a metric fuckton of evidence to support my statements. So much in fact it requires books and books of information. But let's start with something really simple. Let's look at the fifth amendment:
To paraphrase, "no one will be held without due process, EXCEPT in actual service in time of war OR if the public is in danger." In other words, anyone in the military or militia WILL be subject to being held without due process, anytime there is an assessment of "public danger". Public danger is the same as "National Security," which is whatever those in charge believe it is at the time. It is subject to the whims of those in charge. In addition, we have been at war all but 16 years of this country, so the "national security" excuse isn't even required, but it's there if they want it to be. This says explicitly that every single person in the military has NO RIGHTS, and is completely subject to the whims of those in charge of the government.
Now rectify that with the draft. Military service at the time was not optional. Technically, that is still true, though there have been changes to the constitution (14th amendment specifically) that made everyone a slave, so this part of the fifth amendment is really redundant. I am making the case for it being there from the beginning however, so I am focusing on this.
Women didn't really have any rights under Constitutional law at the time (though they had some under common law). Men in the military had no rights, and military service for all men was not optional anytime the PTB willed it. That doesn't mean there weren't plenty of people believing they had rights that the government couldn't take away, but this provides a legal path to take them away on the whims of those in charge. That they only chose to exercise those rights sometimes** doesn't mean the legal path wasn't in there from the beginning.
** For example, George Washington forced (they had no choice) all of his men to be inoculated with small pox, and 3% of them died
To continue:
This says that a person WILL be deprived of life, liberty, or property if "due process of law" deems it necessary. OK, but who determines those laws? Who determines what "due process" is? Who determines what you can or can't do? Is it We The People? No, it is the people who run the Government.
"But "We The People" are the government!"
Are we?
In the beginning, the only people who could even vote for who would be America's King and court (we call them "President" and "Congress," but from a legal perspective, they are identical to King and Court), were wealthy land owners, AKA the Aristocracy. The Government was created and run by the Aristocrats from the beginning. The vast majority of people had no say at all. Men who didn't own land (the majority of the populace), women, wage laborers, apprentices, indentured servants, slaves, etc. had no say whatsoever in who ran the country. And then everyone was subject to the whims of whichever elected Aristocrat got the most campaign money and support from the media, both of which were controlled by the Cabal, then as now.
Importantly, the rest of We The People had no choice but to follow this system. You can't "opt out" of the Government if you think it's Tyrannical. There is no exit clause. It was designed that way on purpose. The people who signed the Treaty we call the Constitution signed for everyone. What about those who didn't want that? They had no say. They had no Rights. They were forced to be subjects to the Government, and their "due process." These things were, from the beginning, subject to the whims of the people in charge.
Whether you think people should be (whether they want to be or not) subjects to the Government (really, they are, legally speaking, subjects (vassals) to the people who run the government) is not the point. My point is the LEGAL STRUCTURE of the system, and the systems that enforce it through coercion (police, DOJ, etc.), gives people no choice.
This states explicitly that you do not own your property. The Government, or rather the people in charge of the government, can take your property any time they want. Your "ownership" of property is subject to the whims of those in charge. Who really owns your property if someone can take it away whenever they want, and there is nothing you can do about it?
This is just a sample of all the Individual Rights violations contained in the founding documents and subsequent laws of the "Founding Fathers." There is so much more. No one knows, because no one looks. We believe what we have been taught about history from schools that were created by John D. Rockefeller, written by books that were commissioned by the Rockefeller Foundation and the General Education Board (created by Rockefeller), and then taken over by the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare which was created by Nelson Rockefeller. See a pattern?
Everything you learned about history and government from your United States education was approved by the Cabal.
Everything.