I think the majority of people aren't buying the "Global Warming/Climate Change" b.s. narrative, but the Black hats are desperate and want to bring chaos, suffering, and depopulation to humanity.
You talk a lot about physics, but you fail to demonstrate understanding of the subject. A 767 weighing about 175 tons, traveling at 440 mph, hitting an office building would cause immense damage from momentum alone, even if it consisted only of water. The major structures inside aircraft (wing spars and deck beams) are I-beams made of aluminum. They are tough cookies, and what happened had no relationship to tossing a beer can at a cement wall. In the event, the curtain walls and interior columns of the Twin Towers did not simply turn into dust upon the collision. So, your account doesn't even begin to accurately describe what happened.
I will leave it at that, because apparently it is unpopular to strip away the bogus authority claimed by people who don't really know.
Good work. That pretty much seals the deal. Anyone else saying otherwise is a spinster of truth. Two towers being hit allegedly by airplanes and collapsing into their own footprint is statistically impossible.
An important point about the collapsing, and tis applied to WTC7 that was never hit by a plane, is that it happened at "freefall speed."
That means that the floor above, suddenly, did not have anything below it to hold it up. If there was some support then it would need to be bent out of the way and that takes time. Each floor would have added more time to the collapse but that never happened. When the upper floors started moving there was no resistance and there was no resistance over the whole area not just a corner that may have melted.
When a building is demolished using explosives they blow up all the supports below a particular floor at one time. The WTC buildings collapsed just like that and it is not possible to get that level of consistency with a fire..
Doesn't affect what I said. The curtain walls of the Twin Towers would have posed no impediment (they are called "curtain walls" because they are not essentially structural; they are there to hold up the exterior covering). They were thin and mostly glass. The rest of the tower was open space between steel support columns. Read up on the 1945 collision of a B-25 bomber with the Empire State Building. It's not like these things haven't happened before.
But it does show that a very high speed collision can obliterate an airplane into small fragments.
The floors were each an acre of 4" thick concrete. That may have made a dent? There was more concrete in a WTC floor than there was in the block in the phantom test - and the plane must have hit at least two of them.
110 floors, 4" thick so around 36 acre feet of concrete. And wasn't there some steel in there, too?
What did hold the building up? The steel box sections were made out of 5" thick steel at the base.
The outer walls were load-bearing and so WERE essential to the structure.
The other point about "physics" is that, presumably, this is a well-understood and well-known effect? Can you find another instance anywhere in the world where a steel-framed, high-rise building collapsed into its own footprint at free-fall speed due to a fire?
The Russians in Syria. They have been developing these since the 1940's, they are electromagnetic scalar weapons. Nothing to do with lasers at all, its a completely new science altogether.
Lasers can be a component of the targeting system in a weapon (target designation). Otherwise, the main categories of directed energy weapons are: lasers, microwaves, and particle beams. Laser DEWs are mainly for a "thermal kill" of the target, and range between 100 kW and 1 MW of output power. Microwave DEWs are mainly for electromagnetic warfare applications (e.g., jamming). Their physics makes it difficult to produce a small spot on target (large wavelengths). Particle beams were a subject of interest in the early SDI years (1980s), but they turned out to be impractical from the standpoint of beam generation, propagation, and directional control.
What for? Blue is a lot darker than any other paint or metal and would lovingly soak up a 100 kW laser beam (which would be infrared, anyway). The best surface we could think of was polished aluminum covered in a cleanly-degrading polymer (CDP). But at an open-fire intensity of 50+ watts/cm2, it wouldn't matter. If as much as a few watts/sq cm got through, the surface quality would be destroyed and the absorption would go up an order of magnitude. It only takes about 1.4 w/cm2 to melt aluminum.
The Israeli weapons are point air defense systems and are home deployed. The U.S. Navy has some comparable deck systems installed on one or two destroyers for trial use, again as air defense systems. They are too important and too expensive and too complex to be used for tasks that only require a kitchen match.
I asked a sincere question quoting your words, "where else have these 'direct energy weapons' been deployed ???" I'd like to know. So, let's start out first telling us where.
Who are you quoting when you wrote, "defensive" and "comment is bit a "demanding"? You're not quoting me, It is you that has wrote this. When I publish posts, people have asked me for sources, to which I obliged and provided sources.
I agree with you with the very strange conflagration and the incinerated ruins of all those structures. There was a complete lack of black charred remains, but rather almost all of it was turned to ashes. Regarding how or what caused it is unknown. Plausible theories have been put forth. However, without hard evidence, it is indirect evidence that does not, on its face, prove a fact in issue but gives rise to a logical inference that the fact exists. It is useful as long as it can be tied to hard evidence. However, the hard evidence is what is lacking. This what we are left with in Lahaina, Paradise Hills in CA and other places. We need the 'smoking gun 'and the criminal suspects, who are responsible. The 'smoking gun' would be the equipment used to start all those fires. As it turns out in a conspiracy such as this,... and yes, this is legally defined as a conspiracy, the cover-up often becomes the bigger crime. In Lahaina, this is what we are seeing. It is a massive cover-up. Often, attacking the cover-up is the best course to take for determining all those people involved in the conspiracy and getting at the truth to how these fires burned as they did.
Interesting that that directed energy weapons are starting to hit the news after telling everyone that they don't exist and it's a "right wing conspiracy theory" hmm.
Nobody has ever said "they don't exist" as a category. News about them in development has been available for half a century. They don't exist as a boogeyman to start fires, however. That would be a "right wing conspiracy theory," and it would be completely unfounded. You would have better luck with a burning glass and sunlight.
Who is "they"? Not anyone in the defense industry, I can tell you that. There have been regular news items for the past half-century, as developments materialize. I can agree that uninformed people may have been saying such things. Why would you think they are a standard of knowledge?
🤣 The article cites a Twitter post as an example of IDF posting their ability to use Lasers against Hamas missiles was identified by the X community as footage from ARMA 3
Particle beam weapons? We studied those in the 1980s. Serious problems with atmospheric propagation and beam stability in the presence of terrestrial magnetic fields. No interest since then.
Just a note for the unwary. The image posted is fake. The narrow red beam is photoshopped onto the photograph. The real beam would fill the aperture and be invisible. Laser weapons are visually undramatic when they operate. All the fun happens at the target.
I'll take Maui for $500, Alex.
I'll take Paradise, CA for $1,000.
I think the majority of people aren't buying the "Global Warming/Climate Change" b.s. narrative, but the Black hats are desperate and want to bring chaos, suffering, and depopulation to humanity.
9/11/01
9.11
{audio transmission}
What is a plane?
What is an I-beam?
What’s a plane made of? Aluminum.
What’s an I-beam made of? Steel.
How thick is airplane aluminum?
How thick is skyscraper steel?
What happens when you throw an aluminum can at a cement wall?
Does the entire cement wall explode into dust, and collapse?
9.11 was obviously not what the news said it was.
Barely any aspect of the official narrative stands up to scrutiny.
How was everyone suddenly blinded to the standard laws of physics they had understood for their entire lives.
Emotional trauma.
Herein lies the most remarkable facet of the crime.
What the world witnessed that day was closer to Hollywood than reality,
Scripted in such a way to be more fantastic than real life, but not fully plausible.
Seeing how many holes there are in the story,
The bigger question is why so few could see the obvious at first.
How many years did they have you fooled?
Some people can never admit they were fooled about anything.
Know-it-Alls.
What use is there in crying over spilt milk?
Why not turn 9.11 into a memorial holiday celebrating the long awaited revelation of the Truth.
“We’ve solved the greatest crime in history!
We’ve brought those who perpetrated it to justice!
Corrected the course they attempted set the world on.”
It has already happened.
All that’s left is for it to be known…
By the sheeple.
ΓQ
“9.11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB”
Have you heard this phrase before?
Did you understand what it meant?
Does this convey accurately what is most pertinent to know about the event that occurred that day.
How can Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth be dismissed by anyone who claims to be a journalist.
If 9.11 was the pin in the grenade that sent the NWO into hyperdrive,
Will a mass awakening to the truth of 9.11 be what ends the Age of Darkness.
When people understand of physics of what happened on 9.11,
Will humanity enter a new paradigm of energy and technology?
ΓQ
Alchemy can turn a stone into gold.
How do you turn a tower into dust?
Did the towers fall? Or did they disappear.
What percentage fell? What percentage disappeared?
What percentage was left in a smoldering pit of molten lava?
“Jet fuel can’t melt steel beams…”
but debunkers will say it can weaken them.
How is jet fuel going to turn an office building into a foundry?
[Hot Spots]
ΓQ
What is the strangest component of 9.11?
The 9.11 rabbit hole has no end.
It doesn’t only lead to a new understanding of geopolitics and war profiteering.
Further down, you face physics that look like magic to the average man.
You face a loosh harvesting mega-ritual, and the biggest MK-Ultra experiment in history.
Trauma based mind control.
You can’t deny it works!
ΓQ
https://deepstatemappingproject.weebly.com/orit-b-codex.html
Judy Wood on 9-11: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vadSaWyiozg
You talk a lot about physics, but you fail to demonstrate understanding of the subject. A 767 weighing about 175 tons, traveling at 440 mph, hitting an office building would cause immense damage from momentum alone, even if it consisted only of water. The major structures inside aircraft (wing spars and deck beams) are I-beams made of aluminum. They are tough cookies, and what happened had no relationship to tossing a beer can at a cement wall. In the event, the curtain walls and interior columns of the Twin Towers did not simply turn into dust upon the collision. So, your account doesn't even begin to accurately describe what happened.
I will leave it at that, because apparently it is unpopular to strip away the bogus authority claimed by people who don't really know.
I will leave you this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4CX-9lkRMQ
Good work. That pretty much seals the deal. Anyone else saying otherwise is a spinster of truth. Two towers being hit allegedly by airplanes and collapsing into their own footprint is statistically impossible.
An important point about the collapsing, and tis applied to WTC7 that was never hit by a plane, is that it happened at "freefall speed."
That means that the floor above, suddenly, did not have anything below it to hold it up. If there was some support then it would need to be bent out of the way and that takes time. Each floor would have added more time to the collapse but that never happened. When the upper floors started moving there was no resistance and there was no resistance over the whole area not just a corner that may have melted.
When a building is demolished using explosives they blow up all the supports below a particular floor at one time. The WTC buildings collapsed just like that and it is not possible to get that level of consistency with a fire..
Doesn't affect what I said. The curtain walls of the Twin Towers would have posed no impediment (they are called "curtain walls" because they are not essentially structural; they are there to hold up the exterior covering). They were thin and mostly glass. The rest of the tower was open space between steel support columns. Read up on the 1945 collision of a B-25 bomber with the Empire State Building. It's not like these things haven't happened before.
But it does show that a very high speed collision can obliterate an airplane into small fragments.
The floors were each an acre of 4" thick concrete. That may have made a dent? There was more concrete in a WTC floor than there was in the block in the phantom test - and the plane must have hit at least two of them.
110 floors, 4" thick so around 36 acre feet of concrete. And wasn't there some steel in there, too?
What did hold the building up? The steel box sections were made out of 5" thick steel at the base.
The outer walls were load-bearing and so WERE essential to the structure.
The other point about "physics" is that, presumably, this is a well-understood and well-known effect? Can you find another instance anywhere in the world where a steel-framed, high-rise building collapsed into its own footprint at free-fall speed due to a fire?
This one, for instance, is still standing.
The Russians in Syria. They have been developing these since the 1940's, they are electromagnetic scalar weapons. Nothing to do with lasers at all, its a completely new science altogether.
Ah, thanks. Interesting. When you see or hear the word lasers in a weapon, DEWs come to mind.
Lasers can be a component of the targeting system in a weapon (target designation). Otherwise, the main categories of directed energy weapons are: lasers, microwaves, and particle beams. Laser DEWs are mainly for a "thermal kill" of the target, and range between 100 kW and 1 MW of output power. Microwave DEWs are mainly for electromagnetic warfare applications (e.g., jamming). Their physics makes it difficult to produce a small spot on target (large wavelengths). Particle beams were a subject of interest in the early SDI years (1980s), but they turned out to be impractical from the standpoint of beam generation, propagation, and directional control.
Cool. Thanks for the info.
"Scalar" physics is a bogus concept, not even clearly explained. There is electromagnetism and it inherently is of a vector nature.
Pursuing this course without the smoking gun will only result in being labeled like Alex Jones was.
And justly so.
If military starts usung a blue camo scheme we'll know whats up.
why didn't I think of that? Another blue I'd expect to see in clown world.
There is a blue camo scheme. Navy, Coast Guard and Marines. Not sure about army.
The navy already had it
What for? Blue is a lot darker than any other paint or metal and would lovingly soak up a 100 kW laser beam (which would be infrared, anyway). The best surface we could think of was polished aluminum covered in a cleanly-degrading polymer (CDP). But at an open-fire intensity of 50+ watts/cm2, it wouldn't matter. If as much as a few watts/sq cm got through, the surface quality would be destroyed and the absorption would go up an order of magnitude. It only takes about 1.4 w/cm2 to melt aluminum.
This blue paint myth is complete hokum.
So this will expose Israel and their DEWs?
Please do tell us.
The Israeli weapons are point air defense systems and are home deployed. The U.S. Navy has some comparable deck systems installed on one or two destroyers for trial use, again as air defense systems. They are too important and too expensive and too complex to be used for tasks that only require a kitchen match.
I asked a sincere question quoting your words, "where else have these 'direct energy weapons' been deployed ???" I'd like to know. So, let's start out first telling us where.
Who are you quoting when you wrote, "defensive" and "comment is bit a "demanding"? You're not quoting me, It is you that has wrote this. When I publish posts, people have asked me for sources, to which I obliged and provided sources.
I agree with you with the very strange conflagration and the incinerated ruins of all those structures. There was a complete lack of black charred remains, but rather almost all of it was turned to ashes. Regarding how or what caused it is unknown. Plausible theories have been put forth. However, without hard evidence, it is indirect evidence that does not, on its face, prove a fact in issue but gives rise to a logical inference that the fact exists. It is useful as long as it can be tied to hard evidence. However, the hard evidence is what is lacking. This what we are left with in Lahaina, Paradise Hills in CA and other places. We need the 'smoking gun 'and the criminal suspects, who are responsible. The 'smoking gun' would be the equipment used to start all those fires. As it turns out in a conspiracy such as this,... and yes, this is legally defined as a conspiracy, the cover-up often becomes the bigger crime. In Lahaina, this is what we are seeing. It is a massive cover-up. Often, attacking the cover-up is the best course to take for determining all those people involved in the conspiracy and getting at the truth to how these fires burned as they did.
Oof. The video shown is from ARMA 3. Amazing.
I assume someone created a mod for it though.
Interesting that that directed energy weapons are starting to hit the news after telling everyone that they don't exist and it's a "right wing conspiracy theory" hmm.
Nobody has ever said "they don't exist" as a category. News about them in development has been available for half a century. They don't exist as a boogeyman to start fires, however. That would be a "right wing conspiracy theory," and it would be completely unfounded. You would have better luck with a burning glass and sunlight.
Yeah...that's not true. They were running around saying they don't exist, at all.
Who is "they"? Not anyone in the defense industry, I can tell you that. There have been regular news items for the past half-century, as developments materialize. I can agree that uninformed people may have been saying such things. Why would you think they are a standard of knowledge?
Mysterious evil lasers don't exist, however.
🤣 The article cites a Twitter post as an example of IDF posting their ability to use Lasers against Hamas missiles was identified by the X community as footage from ARMA 3
Ion cannon
Particle beam weapons? We studied those in the 1980s. Serious problems with atmospheric propagation and beam stability in the presence of terrestrial magnetic fields. No interest since then.
Just a note for the unwary. The image posted is fake. The narrow red beam is photoshopped onto the photograph. The real beam would fill the aperture and be invisible. Laser weapons are visually undramatic when they operate. All the fun happens at the target.