Had this waiting for me this morning...
Sydney Powell led the charge in the 2020 election fraud issue by revealing that the US Military had solid evidence of the fraud in their supercomputer Kraken records.
Milley, the head of the Joint Chiefs at the time, was a solid Biden backer and refused to allow this information to be released. At that time the US Military was dealing with 5 fronts as the CCP was coming across the border from Canada and Soros and Antifa were creating riots.
Trump and his Junta decided the threat of civil war was too great and they would instead bide their time. Sydney wanted to go to SCOTUS but was told by Trump to stand down.
It is time for the Kraken evidence to be revealed, and what better way than via Sydney Powell defending herself. Media interviews await, her huge compilation of evidence
is available worldwide and to all. By pleading guilty to the charges, she speeds the case to the point where suppressing this evidence will not happen. Go Sydney!
The ones that put this out have a rather high perch(not the judges) and have access to info not even the judges have, they can be somewhat mercurial but they have also yet to be wrong so I thought I'd post it...
edit: first time EVER(decades...) that they have made any emotional exclamation or sign of enthusiasm so that ending.....
EDIT 2 : TBF the DS/Kazahrians are very much aware of these people and the operation is getting to a point where this might be a faint designed to get them to jump the gun, they have successfully done this before so.... In any case it is a sign of something being just around the corner as I have yet to see anything from them not be followed by something irl real worthy of serious note....
Honest question- How can Sidney defend herself when she entered guilty plea, removing necessity of trial? While it was stipulated Sidney would have to testify truthfully IF called, no prosecutor in their right mind would put her on the stand so there would not be any opportunity for her to testify. So, how does she defend herself?
You hit the nail on the head. There are other flaws in this story, but this point makes the whole thing moot.
But it's fun fanfiction
But what about the fire emojis?
But if this is all a show, then it's plausible. The prosecutors could be doing their part as directed. If the end is already known and NCSWIC then everything we are seeing is being directed.
Nobody has kept their mouth shut, we all know its a show, we were told so, so what's your point?
Sidney Powell is no longer under the restraints of the trial. It's dead in the water. She pleaded guilty to misdemeanors....nothing burgers. IMHO, the prosecution wanted Sidney Powell to appear in court to railroad her. The Kraken evidence appears as though it would not be germane to the charges weighed against her, anyway. Court rooms are a place of peril. This is why 95 percent of cases are plead outside of the court. Sydney Powell's attorneys recognized this court as being highly political and biased. This was a kangaroo court. Why do I say this?
It was clear for anyone watching the defense attorney argue for dismissal that the prosecution refused to acknowledge and respond to the exculpatory evidence sent to them. It was clear that the exculpatory evidence should have ended all the charges against Powell. It couldn't be any more clear than the evidence presented to them. As a result, the defense was forced to motion the court on this issue. In court, the prosecution argued before the judge that all of this should be heard in the trial. This argument is absurd and this evidence provided the judge should have been grounds for immediate dismissal and sanctions against the Fulton County for wasting the courts time when such evidence was already known. The prosecution's argument only confirmed as being true that the they refused to acknowledge and respond to the exonerating evidence. The legal precedent in any case is that the prosecution should acknowledge such evidence and when such exculpatory evidence is provided, agree to withdraw the case fro dismissal. However, the prosecutor's intent was to get Sidney Powell in court no matter what. The judge listened to the defense, but it was obvious he wasn't going to budge. This was a kangaroo court for political purposes.
I believe Sidney Powell is aware of the Kraken information and undoubtedly briefed on it, but doesn't possess it. There may be more reason why Trump recently posted in clear language that Sidney Powell was never Trump's attorney.
If, somehow, she does have the documents to prove the point, his statement would make it better "optics" for her to testify in Trump's case.
Think about this for a moment..... Sidney Powell may have had clearance to see or be briefed on this. I don't know. Where she got this information is not clear though. The unfortunate write-up of Wikipedia makes Sidney Powell, who having a stellar and highly respected career, appear as being a criminal. They even provide her Fulton County mugshot. The entire emphasis of it is the recent 'guilty plea' to mere misdemeanors, but making it appear as evidence of RICO. It's a shameful example of slander of an upright and innocent individual.
Powell was not part of Trump's legal team though. IMHO, she was brought in to provide Trump with her viewpoint on the massive election fraud and how to challenge it. What did she know then? It has been reported, they rejected her opinion.
The question in my mind is how and when did Powell learn about Kraken? IMHO, Powell could not possibly have this information in her possession. If anything, it is SCIF material. She was an assistant United States attorney for the Western and Northern Districts of Texas and the Eastern District of Virginia, but most recently had her on practice at law. In 2020, Powell established Legal Defense Fund for the American Republic, a 501(c)(4) nonprofit organization with stated purpose to collect funds to help prosecute fraud in U.S. elections.
She couldn’t talk about it before because of the bs charges hanging over her…. Now that those are gone she can bring it up without damaging a ongoing case/investigation into her..
The question is what does she actually know and what evidence can she provide? As you mentioned, this might be the reason she was ensnared in this ridiculous RICO case. The idea of presenting evidence in court is determined by the judge as to what is permitted. Many crimes are committed in those court rooms. Many judges are corrupt and there's not always justice that is served, but rather to these bad judges, it is 'just us' that's served. From there dark chambers nobody else will know.
effectively shutting her down preventing any releases? She wasn't even Trumps attorney. The 'proof' offered that she is team Trump is just a video of Guilliani saying as much? Meaningless. It's all rather desperate to keep the J6 alive
Who says a prosecutor must be the one to call her?
A defendant in a different trial could call her as a witness to support the election stolen viewpoint.
But ... why would she have info/data that the military has and won't release?
I think she's still a defendant in the defamation case brought by Dominion though, along with Giuliani and Mike Lindell. Those cases have been consolidated for purposes of discovery IIRC.
She is also an unindicted co-conspirator in the DC case against Trump.