48 Hour Rule still applies, but here's a list of why Mike Johnson may be actually good
(media.greatawakening.win)
🏆 - WINNING - 🏆
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (52)
sorted by:
Loses me at "opposes gay marriage". Why the fuck are we still even taking a stance in favor of government ordained marriage one way or the other? The way forward is to reword "marriage" to "civil union" and let people figure it out for themselves from there. Government ordained marriage is a blatant violation of the First Amendment as marriage is traditionally a RELIGIOUS practice. How people want to identify their bonds is THEIR business. No one gets to deice who is and is not allowed to be married least of all, the fucking government. And no, don't come at me with "muh nuclear family values" crap. People need to choose those values FOR THEMSELVES and no amount of government programs is going to force people to accept the straight, monogamous, evangelical Christian Conservative lifestyle as the ONLY way to live. Quite the opposite as we have seen.
If you use government to force complacence to your ideology, you are the bad guy. Period.
Otherwise, everything else this guy has done makes sense to me. All things considered, he is the best possible pick, but needs to change his tune to "Abolish Government ordained marriage". That should be something every freedom loving American recognizes as a big fuckin mistake overall.
Marriage historically means a man and woman.
I have an old dictionary that was not “revised” to fit a narrative
The problem is that the government got involved.
How many married men and women will go without their tax benefits to have the separation that there was always meant to be?
There is a difference between a legal union (protected by the Constitution regardless of chromosomes) and religious marriage which is between a man and a woman (protected by the Constitution as per the freedom of religion).
Right, but that should be decided by your church. HOWEVER.
The reason the government is involved is specifically because there are certain tax and insurance implications if you are married.
It doesn't suss out for same-sex marriages though. The reason married people get tax breaks is the assumption that those married people will go on to create future taxpayers. No, not every marriage. You will get your couples that can't or choose not to have kids, but statistically, they will, and that's what the government is counting on.
Same sex couples do not create future taxpayers. They sometimes adopt, but that's not the same, because those kids already exist. The numbers of same sex couples that go on to have a sperm donor or surrogate mothers, whose babies will then go on to be future taxpayers themselves are likely to be so small they are statistically insignificant.
SO I do agree that marriage should be a legal definition, but it should be a legal and religious definition. For all the others, they should have their civil unions and avoid the whole rigamarole.
If they want to find their heathen fake ass church to call them "married" as a mockery of God, that's also, unfortunately covered by the First.
I'm conflicted on the whole thing. The Founders, I don't think expected us to let the lunatic fringe take things this far.
One cannot pick and choose what the founders did or didn't expect, because that opens up to hypocrisy when criticizing stances like the left that uses this exact argument to reference modern day weaponry.
Why? Because now they're open about wanting to fuck children. That's why. They couldn't be happy. No, they had to push it. Now they don't deserve a damn thing.
Oh get over it already and accept the fact that homosexuality is a "gateway deviancy" into all the morally degenerate crap we see going on today. Every single time in history the homosexuality became openly accepted, it's always led to various forms of degeneracy, with the end goal being pedophila in every case. Ancient Greece/Rome, Ancient Japan, Weimar Germany, etc. etc.
Every single time, it always ends the same. I personally believe it's a mental illness and there's probably a cure for it, but regardless, the historical evidence speaks for itself. Homosexuality, leads to rampant degeneracy.
EVERY SINGLE TIME.
And every time it's brought up on here, you come running to defend it. Get over it and accept that if nothing else, it's a gateway to degeneracy. If two people wanna be queer behind closed doors, fine. That's between them and God and I agree the government has no right to decide what happens in a private home.
That's why I'm against things like the old Texas "Anti-sodomy law" that let Texas Police break into someone's house if they were accused of being gay (similar to red flag laws).
But open acceptance of homosexuality has led to nothing but degeneracy where we have queers in San Fransisco singing about forcibly converting children into being gay, public schools brainwashing children into being gay, trans, non-binary, etc. etc. and pedophile drag queens dressing up as LITERAL DEMONS, reading gay propaganda to children in libraries.
When you're defending homosexuality, YOU ARE DEFENDING THAT DEVIANCY.
nah bro
this is where you lost me because you're going to die on a bridge you don't even need to be standing on.
It has been decided what a marriage is and who can participate and what the implications of entering that arrangement are. period.
Everything else about the government choosing to encourage/discourage a certain culture is ridiculous.
A government exists to enforce the written (and sorties unwritten) rules of a civil society.
Uncivilized, mentally ill liberals who want to marry their dog or whatever asshattery liberals enjoy are free to set up a parallel society in whatever socialist utopia they want.
But they don't want to do that. They want to bitch and moan about the very things that made a civil society civil to begin with WHILE LIVING IN THE CIVIL SOCIETY.
Get the fuck out and make your own society with whatever backwoods bullshit you want.
I hear you. I really do. I am an atheist and a libertarian. Prior to being red-pilled I would have agreed with you 100%.
Unfortunately we live an a CORRUPT world where there are hidden agendas at play.
One of those agendas in order to usher in Marxism is to destroy the atomic family.
I need to find the a video and put it in here, but there are essentially four goals of Marxists and one of those is to destroy the family. There is a Dr. Ksomething I need to find and she can explain it very well. Look out for an edit.
In the meantime, see what Pat Condell has to say about this as he nailed it. See if this changes your perspective.
“OK Groomer”
https://rumble.com/v3kor9v-ok-groomer.html
Edit: Found who I was looking for.
Dr. Karlyn Borysenko. (I HIGHLY recommend that you watch some of her videos. It will really help you understand what the Deep State is up to. In a just world, I’d agree with you 100%. We do not live in that world.)
The Four Goals of the Woke (Authoritarian) Left are Always The Same (How To Speak Socialist)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HK1NUMfvZ2I