I didn't watch all but from the multiple examples I saw, they were hesitant to admit on camera that they trust/respect non-jews and dont truly believe non-jews deserve equal rights to them.
Pretty much! We US citizens may feel similar to illegals but those who legally obtain citizenship LEGALLY are peers and deserve every right and protection afforded to us under the Constitution.
Jews in Israel do not seem to have a similar belief when it comes to any and all non-jews.
Sticky Note: This is an important question that most of us wonder about, as to how Jews look at non-jews in reality. This video gives a honest glance at how people approach this question.
Actually I have never, even once, thought about this. If they want to think they are better than me, it's their problem, not mine.
Not one thing in my life is affected by their opinion of themselves.
In that vein, then doesn’t a home invader have the same rights to your home, food, belongings, savings and property as you?
Same thing. They weren’t invited. The broke our laws coming, are stealing our resources; something they have neither earned nor are entitled to
I have a response to a home invader. It’s as painless as I can make it, permanent and not subject to debate. There is no surrender; they entered the wrong home.
You may have missed my sarcasm. There are also some nuances getting lost in translation. Bottom line is most of these Jews/Israelis, think that that non-Jews aka non-Israelis aren't entitled to the same rights as those who have their own land and national religion. Same way I think anyone that isn't born here of legal citizens or naturalized should not have the same rights.
It's all about Nationalism. In Judaism, Nationalism is tied to religion like it is in many countries. Zionism is Nationalism. Is there anything wrong with that?
Oh I do agree
It’s at the point where one takes actions to suppress another; that blood flows and wars begin
Muslims believe, submit or die. Thomas Jefferson’s first war was against the Islamic Pirates. Their belief is taking American slaves was met with violence they were unprepared to face
Like Rome, you may not have loved Rome; but you feared Rome. Rome really didn’t care which.
The threshold is the key. The threshold being, a window, a door, any entry point of a residence. Once that is crossed ALL bets are OFF. Shoot first, ask questions later.
My favorite part of this thread is the little side conversation between the Israel supporters using home invasion as an example for the justification of Israel’s actions while being completely oblivious to the massive irony of that example.
I don’t care what they think. Neither you, nor I, can control what anyone else thinks
What they do; that is what matters
If group A attacks group B; merciless war until one side or the other offers unconditional surrender. It’s worked for civil wars, WWI and WWII; negotiated peace always results in continued hostilities
We can all convince each other. This is why debate is possible.
Not caring about what people think sounds all well and good, "muh freedom" after all, until the beliefs you allowed to go unchallenged come crashing down when the "do" catches up with the "think".
For example, the lefties think Trump supporters are evil racist Nazis. Up until a certain point, these were only thoughts. That is, until they are at a moment's notice turned into actions and certain lefties start committing violent acts or other crimes against Trump supporters as a direct result of what they think about hem.
As another example, I absolutely care if someone's belief is "Satan is very good". I'm not just going to sit around and wait until this person starts raping kids and sacrificing babies. I'm going to attempt to convince them they are wrong before they are too far gone into it. It might not work, but so what?
Waiting until a problem exists as a justification for a shit solution, that you might not have even needed to employ if you didn't wait, is retarded.
I guess they haven't learned yet they are not the Israelites of the Torah. Actually, I think they know, but if they admit it publicly, they will lose the Christian largesse that has allowed them a privileged lifestyle.
They want preferred citizenship, property, and voting rights over "non-natives." Can we have that in the US too, please? I respect tight national laws no matter the country/ethnicity/religion. They all said they'd treat every human equally, just like I'd expect to hear from any red-blooded, God-fearing American. Good video.
I can tell you from living in Brooklyn in and around 50th Street and New Utrecht that if you are not Jewish, you are dirt. Seen it too many times to count. These were Orthodox Jews
Some Muslims believe that the religiously correct way to interact with any non-Muslim is to either kill or enslave them, if they can. If they don't think they can they are very courteous & nice until such time they are able. I think I'd rather take my chances with the Jews, thank you very much.
Paul was chosen by Jesus, he was permanently changed in that moment. Interesting how people to claim Paul was "stealing" Jesus' message and changing it for himself, they look at his life as Pharisee as all he ever was, apparently no one is ever allowed to change.
One could argue that he always knew his Lord, he just didn't know that the same was this Jesus he was persecuting. Jesus made that clear to him on the road to Damascus, long time ago.....
Same could be true of any Jewish person today, it's always possible. I once had this discussion with a Jewish person in rabbinical school & at some point she realized that this Jesus I spoke about could be the Messiah. I guess there are 2 versions of the Messiah in their tradition. Most of the time they speak of the Davic Messiah who is a victorious figure but she explained that there is also mention of what she called a "Machiac ben Yo-off. (or something like that) who is a more tragic figure, like Jesus
She charged me not to tell anyone that she said that though. I guess there is fear in their community about that.
Inspoken’s comment is exactly where I was going with mine.
Thank you for the clear wording.
In synagogues, they refuse to teach Isaiah 53, because it gets too obvious, and they “don’t want people to get confused.”
Don’t worry, though, it’s definitely not only Jews who can be stiff-necked. It’s very much a human condition.
The conflict between Judaism and Christianity is a very interesting one. It shouldn’t exist, but Satan is astoundingly good at deception. He’s got both sides off course. We truly all have to humble ourselves and look to the scriptures.
You want it to get really fun? The Muslims claim that the Torah is authoritative and claim Jesus is the greatest prophet. Should they be on our side, too? No idea! There may be a huge conversion movement to Christianity underway within their ranks, though, if some things I’ve seen are real. One big thing that keeps them from converting is Trinitarian doctrine, which may or may not be correct, but are we actually correct about the scriptural basis for it, or is it a doctrine of men?
First and foremost, please don’t understand anything I’m saying as a denial of Trinitarianism. I personally see accepting Yeshua as atoning sacrifice and doorway to grace, and acceptance of Trinitarian Doctrine, as two entirely separate things. Nor do I see non-claimance of Trinitarianism as definitive truth as denial of it. I suspect it’s one of those things that, if it is correct, we may only learn once we know in full.
What I am pointing at, however, is it’s state of potentially being a stumbling block, which we also aught not be placing. Neither John 1:1-18 (which is a verse I truly love),
nor Luke 3:21-22, nor Matt 28:19, nor 2 Corinthians 13:14, nor even other verses such as Matthew 5:9, Luke 20:36, Matthew 16:27, John 12:50 confirm, infallibly, the “coequal” or “coeternal” or “consubstantial” aspects of the Trinitarian doctrine, which as best as I know it was not taught as truth until the Council of Nicea in 325.
It’s not that it may not be true, it’s that it’s not firmly based in scripture in both Old and New Testaments, and thus is a doctrine of men. Worth noting is that since Christianity adopted it, Jews also commonly hold it against Us when it comes to accepting Moshiach.
Matthew 18:7.
We know that the doctrine was not in the earliest church, because we know it was explicitly created later, and we should be of utmost caution in approaching Revelation 22:18 / Deuteronomy 4:2.
Again, this is not a claim that it’s wrong, necessarily, it’s a strong caution and questioning of our authority to assert it, inerrantly.
For God is not the author of confusion but of peace
1 Corinthians 14:33
Do not curse the deaf or put a stumbling block in front of the blind, but fear your God. I am the LORD
Leviticus 19:14
It creates stumbling blocks within other groups who acknowledge the Old Testament as authoritative, and it creates confusion within those who are not of the faith (something that is regularly caveated with “it has to be taken as a divine mystery” should probably not be taught as dogmatic truth), both of which are commanded to be avoided, while not creating anything fruitful toward godly outcomes.
It’s also worth noting that Hinduism also worships a holy trinity of Mahavedi - Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva - the Generator, Operator, and Destroyer. Are we absolutely certain that the concept of a trinity didn’t stem from that?
Don’t take my word for any of this. I do not believe I can claim that the trinity is false, or blasphemy, of idolatry. Certainly not with doubtless confidence. My point is only that this concept needs to be humbly and dispassionately, but intensely, examined, before proclaiming it as definitive Truth, especially given some of the outcomes we do see from doing so. Do let this turn on an alert light that sparks further investigation against the scriptures with a childlike, earnest heart.
We should always test everything and hold fast to what is good. Peace to you.
The mainstream religions were created specifically to start this world war to institue a one world government. NPCs believing in fake religious books are about to cause the complete enslavement of humanity
I didn't watch all but from the multiple examples I saw, they were hesitant to admit on camera that they trust/respect non-jews and dont truly believe non-jews deserve equal rights to them.
I think from the questioning, they caught on very quickly.
Yup. You could see the gears turning about how to answer for the camera.
Isn't that white supremacy then? Or is it the same as dual citizenship. But only claim one of the sides depending on optics?
Ie: reference the Morgan Freeman and Mike Wallace interview about "ethnicity" specific history months. https://youtu.be/GeixtYS-P3s?si=q6N93fFTwy73plAA
Pretty much! We US citizens may feel similar to illegals but those who legally obtain citizenship LEGALLY are peers and deserve every right and protection afforded to us under the Constitution.
Jews in Israel do not seem to have a similar belief when it comes to any and all non-jews.
Sticky Note: This is an important question that most of us wonder about, as to how Jews look at non-jews in reality. This video gives a honest glance at how people approach this question.
Anyone who has lived adjacent to a Jewish community knows how they feel about non-Jews.
Sadly most of us don't have that opportunity. Why don't you elaborate your own experiences by giving some anecdotes
I'll pass, Moderator.
Actually I have never, even once, thought about this. If they want to think they are better than me, it's their problem, not mine. Not one thing in my life is affected by their opinion of themselves.
When they hold such disproportionate power as they do in our country, they absolutely are your problem and have an affect on your life.
But that wasn't the question I answered.
As an American, should illegal immigrants have the same rights as citizens? I mean, we're all humans, amiright?
In that vein, then doesn’t a home invader have the same rights to your home, food, belongings, savings and property as you?
Same thing. They weren’t invited. The broke our laws coming, are stealing our resources; something they have neither earned nor are entitled to
I have a response to a home invader. It’s as painless as I can make it, permanent and not subject to debate. There is no surrender; they entered the wrong home.
You may have missed my sarcasm. There are also some nuances getting lost in translation. Bottom line is most of these Jews/Israelis, think that that non-Jews aka non-Israelis aren't entitled to the same rights as those who have their own land and national religion. Same way I think anyone that isn't born here of legal citizens or naturalized should not have the same rights.
It's all about Nationalism. In Judaism, Nationalism is tied to religion like it is in many countries. Zionism is Nationalism. Is there anything wrong with that?
That’s exactly what they claim America did.
It’s not true, in my opinion, though there was definitely a civilizational conflict.
Oh I do agree It’s at the point where one takes actions to suppress another; that blood flows and wars begin Muslims believe, submit or die. Thomas Jefferson’s first war was against the Islamic Pirates. Their belief is taking American slaves was met with violence they were unprepared to face
Like Rome, you may not have loved Rome; but you feared Rome. Rome really didn’t care which.
The threshold is the key. The threshold being, a window, a door, any entry point of a residence. Once that is crossed ALL bets are OFF. Shoot first, ask questions later.
Illegal is illegal, you broke the law! Just get your cheating ass out
My favorite part of this thread is the little side conversation between the Israel supporters using home invasion as an example for the justification of Israel’s actions while being completely oblivious to the massive irony of that example.
I don’t care what they think. Neither you, nor I, can control what anyone else thinks
What they do; that is what matters
If group A attacks group B; merciless war until one side or the other offers unconditional surrender. It’s worked for civil wars, WWI and WWII; negotiated peace always results in continued hostilities
We can all convince each other. This is why debate is possible.
Not caring about what people think sounds all well and good, "muh freedom" after all, until the beliefs you allowed to go unchallenged come crashing down when the "do" catches up with the "think".
For example, the lefties think Trump supporters are evil racist Nazis. Up until a certain point, these were only thoughts. That is, until they are at a moment's notice turned into actions and certain lefties start committing violent acts or other crimes against Trump supporters as a direct result of what they think about hem.
As another example, I absolutely care if someone's belief is "Satan is very good". I'm not just going to sit around and wait until this person starts raping kids and sacrificing babies. I'm going to attempt to convince them they are wrong before they are too far gone into it. It might not work, but so what?
Waiting until a problem exists as a justification for a shit solution, that you might not have even needed to employ if you didn't wait, is retarded.
You either have freedom; or you do not
If some idiot wants to worship Satan; my freedom says I can openly mock him for the idiot he is.
But suppression is oppression; which leads to war
CORRECT: This video is hate porn.
"The peace of today is paid for with the blood of tomorrow."
I guess they haven't learned yet they are not the Israelites of the Torah. Actually, I think they know, but if they admit it publicly, they will lose the Christian largesse that has allowed them a privileged lifestyle.
Ask them with a hidden camera instead.
The truth will always come out…
They want preferred citizenship, property, and voting rights over "non-natives." Can we have that in the US too, please? I respect tight national laws no matter the country/ethnicity/religion. They all said they'd treat every human equally, just like I'd expect to hear from any red-blooded, God-fearing American. Good video.
I can tell you from living in Brooklyn in and around 50th Street and New Utrecht that if you are not Jewish, you are dirt. Seen it too many times to count. These were Orthodox Jews
Some Muslims believe that the religiously correct way to interact with any non-Muslim is to either kill or enslave them, if they can. If they don't think they can they are very courteous & nice until such time they are able. I think I'd rather take my chances with the Jews, thank you very much.
That’s definitely where they get on my bad side.
Even less of a fan of taqiyya. All lies are from Satan.
Check my other post. We live in interesting times.
OK RABBI 👍
What the fuck is "ethnically jewish?" It's a religion! One can't converrt to Japanese, but one can surely convert to judaism..."jew" isn't a race...
The newcomer is always the most zealous in almost any order or group of any sort.
Don't members of any group consider members of their group as a little bit more special??
No they do not.
They have much hatred for Messianic jews as well.
So did Paul.
Paul was chosen by Jesus, he was permanently changed in that moment. Interesting how people to claim Paul was "stealing" Jesus' message and changing it for himself, they look at his life as Pharisee as all he ever was, apparently no one is ever allowed to change.
One could argue that he always knew his Lord, he just didn't know that the same was this Jesus he was persecuting. Jesus made that clear to him on the road to Damascus, long time ago.....
Same could be true of any Jewish person today, it's always possible. I once had this discussion with a Jewish person in rabbinical school & at some point she realized that this Jesus I spoke about could be the Messiah. I guess there are 2 versions of the Messiah in their tradition. Most of the time they speak of the Davic Messiah who is a victorious figure but she explained that there is also mention of what she called a "Machiac ben Yo-off. (or something like that) who is a more tragic figure, like Jesus
She charged me not to tell anyone that she said that though. I guess there is fear in their community about that.
Inspoken’s comment is exactly where I was going with mine.
Thank you for the clear wording.
In synagogues, they refuse to teach Isaiah 53, because it gets too obvious, and they “don’t want people to get confused.”
Don’t worry, though, it’s definitely not only Jews who can be stiff-necked. It’s very much a human condition.
The conflict between Judaism and Christianity is a very interesting one. It shouldn’t exist, but Satan is astoundingly good at deception. He’s got both sides off course. We truly all have to humble ourselves and look to the scriptures.
You want it to get really fun? The Muslims claim that the Torah is authoritative and claim Jesus is the greatest prophet. Should they be on our side, too? No idea! There may be a huge conversion movement to Christianity underway within their ranks, though, if some things I’ve seen are real. One big thing that keeps them from converting is Trinitarian doctrine, which may or may not be correct, but are we actually correct about the scriptural basis for it, or is it a doctrine of men?
First and foremost, please don’t understand anything I’m saying as a denial of Trinitarianism. I personally see accepting Yeshua as atoning sacrifice and doorway to grace, and acceptance of Trinitarian Doctrine, as two entirely separate things. Nor do I see non-claimance of Trinitarianism as definitive truth as denial of it. I suspect it’s one of those things that, if it is correct, we may only learn once we know in full.
What I am pointing at, however, is it’s state of potentially being a stumbling block, which we also aught not be placing. Neither John 1:1-18 (which is a verse I truly love), nor Luke 3:21-22, nor Matt 28:19, nor 2 Corinthians 13:14, nor even other verses such as Matthew 5:9, Luke 20:36, Matthew 16:27, John 12:50 confirm, infallibly, the “coequal” or “coeternal” or “consubstantial” aspects of the Trinitarian doctrine, which as best as I know it was not taught as truth until the Council of Nicea in 325.
It’s not that it may not be true, it’s that it’s not firmly based in scripture in both Old and New Testaments, and thus is a doctrine of men. Worth noting is that since Christianity adopted it, Jews also commonly hold it against Us when it comes to accepting Moshiach.
Matthew 18:7.
We know that the doctrine was not in the earliest church, because we know it was explicitly created later, and we should be of utmost caution in approaching Revelation 22:18 / Deuteronomy 4:2.
Again, this is not a claim that it’s wrong, necessarily, it’s a strong caution and questioning of our authority to assert it, inerrantly.
For God is not the author of confusion but of peace 1 Corinthians 14:33
Do not curse the deaf or put a stumbling block in front of the blind, but fear your God. I am the LORD Leviticus 19:14
It creates stumbling blocks within other groups who acknowledge the Old Testament as authoritative, and it creates confusion within those who are not of the faith (something that is regularly caveated with “it has to be taken as a divine mystery” should probably not be taught as dogmatic truth), both of which are commanded to be avoided, while not creating anything fruitful toward godly outcomes.
It’s also worth noting that Hinduism also worships a holy trinity of Mahavedi - Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva - the Generator, Operator, and Destroyer. Are we absolutely certain that the concept of a trinity didn’t stem from that?
Don’t take my word for any of this. I do not believe I can claim that the trinity is false, or blasphemy, of idolatry. Certainly not with doubtless confidence. My point is only that this concept needs to be humbly and dispassionately, but intensely, examined, before proclaiming it as definitive Truth, especially given some of the outcomes we do see from doing so. Do let this turn on an alert light that sparks further investigation against the scriptures with a childlike, earnest heart.
We should always test everything and hold fast to what is good. Peace to you.
Careful, they'll take your funny hat away and call you a goyboy.
The mainstream religions were created specifically to start this world war to institue a one world government. NPCs believing in fake religious books are about to cause the complete enslavement of humanity
Highly encouraged to watch a lot of the other content on his page. Very very interesting
Talmud allows a Jew to lie to a Goy as a Goy is equal to an animal and deserves no human dignities.
Don't trust them. Only God knows his true people and only He will make false Jews apparent to us.