7th Circuit: AR-15s Not Protected by Second Amendment
(www.breitbart.com)
Comments (49)
sorted by:
I think they are confused. They meant to say the AR-15 protects the 2nd Amendment.
They just violated the SOTUS ruling. Not a mistake, Check out all the Circuit Courts Ruling around the Country and look at percentages are that SCOTUS overturned their rulings. You would be shocked to the point you would ask why their butts are on circuit courts. This shows you how deep the corruption really is.
Judge Brennan dissented from the majority decision, stressing that the Illinois “assault weapons” ban fails if tested by Bruen (2022) because the ban has no historical precedent in American tradition.
Judge Brennan follows the letter of the law. Now why do the others ignore the last SCOTUS ruling ?
All Obama and Biden judges need to face impeachment proceedings.
Tribunals
No, they need to face the wall....of justice
Well ok then all of mine are AR14`s
Love my AR 10s
I'm very fond of my mini 14.....
I even have tha A team folding stock.
Kek
When people ask me "What is an AR-10?" (being more familiar with the AR-15 in the news), I tell them, "Well, it's 5 AR's safer than an AR-15." You'd be surprised at how many people say, "Oh... interesting."
I abided by the Supreme Court ruling they are violating. there were no restrictions that can be applied as per SCOTUS, I go with SCOTUS and the 7th can go pound sand.
Naughty, naughty..... That's saying an AR-15 is not a fire arm. From under what rocks do these people come from?
They are violating the last SCITUS ruling and here is what they need to be charged with.
https://www.justice.gov/crt/deprivation-rights-under-color-law
Hey, that could go really well for us. If it is not a firearm, than atf can pound sand.
Just on that ruling alone they should be tried for treason. Period
They totally ignored the SCOTUS ruling and exposed their sorry butts.
Agreed, now they get the treason charges.
They are now being brought into the light.
Indeed plus stupidity should be automatic conviction
How is "shall not be infringed" unclear?
It is unclear only when you are corrupt.
That incredibly short sighted, ridiculous decision will be overturned on appeal.
More incredibly stupid "Lawfare" from controlled puppets,who appear to have no knowledge of firearms and didn't bother to consult with people who have knowledge about firearms before handing down their flawed decision.
Amen and we exposed more judges that ignored the SCOTUS ruling.
I'm with you there,fren. This will force some more swamp creatures to reveal themselves.
Exactly what we need and want them to do.
👍
Being necessary to the security of a free State...
Without guns in the hands of American patriots there is no pursuit of life, liberty, and happiness. There is only tyranny, starvation, and death. I'd sooner see all these traitors lined up and shot.
They knowingly violated the last SCOTUS ruling. here is the proper charge.
https://www.justice.gov/crt/deprivation-rights-under-color-law
Correct me if I’m wrong but if it’s made by any Company other than ArmaLite, it’s not an AR.
Is a 1911 45 not a 1911 45 because Colt did not manufacture it ?
I tend to agree with you. I’m just being snarky and playing a little devils advocate. Possible loophole maybe?
SCOTUS will overturn. Guns are safe.
I totally agree.
2nd Amendment...the f... you say?
Notice they cited the vegas false flag
I noticed they ignored the SCOTUS ruling they are supposed to go by.
It's protected. Come over and I'll show you....
The Constitution says we can and they know it. To the tune Trump won and they know it.
LOL, I am having a senior moment so I have no recollection.
Overturn incoming lol
You know it. Time for investigation of depravation to rights under color of law. Once convicted law suits filed on them.
They should just rename the gun to something else.
Why appease them. They care nothing about violating our Constitutional Rights. They can move to China and be happy.
I guess it's time to pull-out the old cannon then!
Here is the proper charges since they ignored the SCOTUS ruling with the exception of the one that followed it.
https://www.justice.gov/crt/deprivation-rights-under-color-law