Exactly what I was thinking. Same as the exact moment of the hammer supposedly hitting Paul Pelosi in the head was the ONLY part that wasn’t captured on the police bodycam.
This scene of the flying car seems like there would have had to be a ramp or something to send that car flying so high (and loooooong hang time) - it almost looks like some type of Evil Knievel style car jump.
I’ve seen (in person) cars hit guard rails, medians and other cars that sent the car into the air, but the air time was minimal and usually the worst was that the car flipped over - not fly 10 or so feet in the air for 50 yards or something (I’m super estimating - ball parking with those numbers, btw).
It absolutely could've been planned - in fact it likely was judging by how quickly the "it's terrorism" narrative came out, and how quickly that narrative also failed once real video came out. Someone didn't get the memo that the camera "wasn't working at the time".
You do realize that many cars can be hacked and remotely controlled, right? Yes - it could also just be some high a-hole speeding.
If you look at the timestamp from the clip from the Daily Mail (embedded in the GWP article), you might notice a curious fact: The incident happened at 11:22 am on 11/22.
No way a curb bump would send a car that high in the air. It would have blow the tires and broken off the wheels and the suspension/struts. Ask any race car driver. I'm not buying this yet.
Isn't it a coincidence that right at the very second the car goes airborne, you can't see exactly what happened because of a pole.
Exactly what I was thinking. Same as the exact moment of the hammer supposedly hitting Paul Pelosi in the head was the ONLY part that wasn’t captured on the police bodycam.
This scene of the flying car seems like there would have had to be a ramp or something to send that car flying so high (and loooooong hang time) - it almost looks like some type of Evil Knievel style car jump.
I’ve seen (in person) cars hit guard rails, medians and other cars that sent the car into the air, but the air time was minimal and usually the worst was that the car flipped over - not fly 10 or so feet in the air for 50 yards or something (I’m super estimating - ball parking with those numbers, btw).
I'd say it looks like something a stunt crew would have set up for a...movie.
Indeed!
It does, they explode a log into the ground to flip the vehicle and it drives up a small ramp at the same time flipping vehicle airborne
And like the Zapruter film.
I don't think that could have been planned TBH. How would one plan the trajectory to exactly land under the bridge, after flying?
[Gavel sound] Not a False Flag.
Some fool driving waay too fast.
It absolutely could've been planned - in fact it likely was judging by how quickly the "it's terrorism" narrative came out, and how quickly that narrative also failed once real video came out. Someone didn't get the memo that the camera "wasn't working at the time".
You do realize that many cars can be hacked and remotely controlled, right? Yes - it could also just be some high a-hole speeding.
Of course this came out 2 days ago... coincidence? https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/gov-kathy-hochul-outlines-steps-new-york-will-take-to-combat-threats-of-violence-and-radicalization/
Somebody remaking "Hooper", with a Canadian knock off Burt Reynolds?
To all of my fellow GTA fans. That has to be a hidden stunt and this dude got the max score for sure. ;)
If you look at the timestamp from the clip from the Daily Mail (embedded in the GWP article), you might notice a curious fact: The incident happened at 11:22 am on 11/22.
But I'm sure it's just a coincidence......
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/11/surveillance-video-shows-vehicle-us-canada-border-going/
General Lee rides again!!
No way a curb bump would send a car that high in the air. It would have blow the tires and broken off the wheels and the suspension/struts. Ask any race car driver. I'm not buying this yet.
About 100 to 125 ft?
That was some Evil Kneivel shit right there. Wow. Definitely a Bentley.
Who was operating the camera that was panning? Why was the camera following that car?
My guess is they took the original video, zoomed in, and focused on the car.
So…..that’s a $300,000 Bentley.
He was flyin
terminal velocity, must be going 90+
Terminal velocity….? How does the maximum speed at which an object can freefall have anything to do with this?