1: Jan's recent popularity from her BBC news moment has catapulted her right into the top tiers of the PaYtriot movement and she's lapping it up.
2: This is a classic misdirecting bait-and-switch.
With a list (not THE list) coming out, throwing Trump's name in the mix gets the left in a frenzy to share the info which makes it viral and circulates it better. Once this happens, the truth about Trump never going to the island and in fact Trump seemingly to be one of the few to actually help with Epstien's prosecution is explained. This exonerates Trump (for the bazillionth time) and forces the left to swallow another red pill.
I'm leaning towards #1. Probably won't take much time to tell.
Agreed. I’ve listened to her since she appeared and the paytriots at BIN found her and dug their hooks in. I think she is legitimate, Trump-approved and is playing a significant part in getting info out.
45 retruthed her interview about election fraud, which was early on in her recent re-emergence into the alt-media spotlight.
It means nothing more than that. She said something 45 considered true about election fraud... which predates much of the kooky larpy shit she started spewing afterwards.
The MSM tells the truth occasionally too. Do you believe all the crap they push as well?
I'm sorry not sorry, but when your main outlets to the public are known grifter paytriot circles the likes of Charlie Ward, Simon Parkes, Nino, Scott McKay, & Juan the Con... then by default anons should immediately question everything they are pushing.
The only folks who fell in any so called rabbit holes are those gullible enough to do so. Many anons here have been vocal about the paytriot grift for years now and still some anons are addicted to any kind of hopium they can latch on to... even if it comes from literal sophists.
I mean, sure. Let’s wait for the 24/48 hour/day rule. But upon grifting, you are in the clinker until verifiable evidence pulls you out, because verifiable evidence put you in in the first place.
I see two scenarios here:
1: Jan's recent popularity from her BBC news moment has catapulted her right into the top tiers of the PaYtriot movement and she's lapping it up.
2: This is a classic misdirecting bait-and-switch.
With a list (not THE list) coming out, throwing Trump's name in the mix gets the left in a frenzy to share the info which makes it viral and circulates it better. Once this happens, the truth about Trump never going to the island and in fact Trump seemingly to be one of the few to actually help with Epstien's prosecution is explained. This exonerates Trump (for the bazillionth time) and forces the left to swallow another red pill.
I'm leaning towards #1. Probably won't take much time to tell.
Your #2 is actually the most insightful comment in this thread, so far. Good thought.
I'm leaning towards #2 as well, especially after my Morning coffee....kek
Same.
The problem with #1 is Trump actually recognizing her on a Truth.
+++ on Truth has also implied she's a good one
This
👌👌
I'll take door number two, RAD. Everything she puts out there is purposeful. Of that, I feel certain.
Agreed. I’ve listened to her since she appeared and the paytriots at BIN found her and dug their hooks in. I think she is legitimate, Trump-approved and is playing a significant part in getting info out.
Your intuition is spot on. #1 is the correct answer.
Hayes is no different than the scummy paytriot circles she hangs with. Anons are their target audience.
Why did Trump recognize her on a Truth then and send us all chasing rabbits down the hole?
45 retruthed her interview about election fraud, which was early on in her recent re-emergence into the alt-media spotlight.
It means nothing more than that. She said something 45 considered true about election fraud... which predates much of the kooky larpy shit she started spewing afterwards.
The MSM tells the truth occasionally too. Do you believe all the crap they push as well?
I'm sorry not sorry, but when your main outlets to the public are known grifter paytriot circles the likes of Charlie Ward, Simon Parkes, Nino, Scott McKay, & Juan the Con... then by default anons should immediately question everything they are pushing.
The only folks who fell in any so called rabbit holes are those gullible enough to do so. Many anons here have been vocal about the paytriot grift for years now and still some anons are addicted to any kind of hopium they can latch on to... even if it comes from literal sophists.
She’s the female Lin Wood.
I mean, sure. Let’s wait for the 24/48 hour/day rule. But upon grifting, you are in the clinker until verifiable evidence pulls you out, because verifiable evidence put you in in the first place.
I said what I said. IDGAF