It’s not just the shills. I’ve noticed this as a pattern of coping by all of the leftists. I noticed it first when Epstein first arrested. The same leftists that said it was a conspiracy theory that there was a guy honey trapping powerful people luring them to an island of sex with minors , and they’d profusely and with every fiber of their body scream at anyone who suggested otherwise , suddenly “knew all along” when the mainstream narrative accepted Epstein was a real thing. Absolute maddening
In a weird way, this anomaly works in the great awakenings favor.
Once the precipice hits and all of the truths are rolled out these gullible folks will all fold over to our side. Even if they are still just acting on lemming like responses, they will still be on the right side of things.
Total Sun Tzu move. Herd the sheep to walk into a different paddock that's gates are wide open. They may bleat that they freed themselves but that doesn't matter... sheep gonna bleat. What matters is only 4-6% will be left in their mental cages.
I remember several years back reading a blog post from David Wilcock, saying this is exactly how it would happen - that all the skeptics and haters will save face by claiming they “always knew”. I don’t know why that little tidbit stuck with me (probably because that idea bothered me) but it seems to be the case.
But he is on it. You can't excuse him because he never actually went to the island, and ignore that many others on that list never went to the island either. Like Clinton.
What I'm saying is that people are going around saying that people on that list are child sex offenders and rapists just for being on the list.
But when people point out that Trump is on the list too, the argument shifts to "Oh, his name was just brought up and he never went to the island."
But there are other people on that list who never went to the island, either. Their names were on that list for other reasons. Yet they're still guilty.
Ok, I'm confused as shit here. I'm missing something important. Can someone help my dumb ass out here?
I thought that the only thing that happened was the names on the list (at least some of them) were made public. Everyone already knew the lists existed, so it's not some huge surprise.
And is Trump on the list or not? The MSM is saying he was on there, some Anons here are saying he wasn't, some are saying he was, but somehow it's different than the others.
There is no list here. This is unredacted depositions from Virginia Guifres case against Ghislane Maxwell. And this is just the first small part of it. So far nothing is really new to us anons that have followed from the beginning. But it is setting the stage, establishing the pattern with the right timing to reach a broader audience that ignored or denied it the first time around.
There was a list of people's names that were mentioned in documents. Trump's name was mentioned because a victim was asked at deposition if Trump had ever been to the Island and the answer was: No. Ever to the NY mansion (or was it Florida?): No. Ever to the Ranch? No.
Yes, in another post someone explained that to me.
The issue I have is that there are many people on that list of names that were just released that had similar stories.
But the problem is that if you listen to people here talk about it, everyone on those lists are guilty of going to Epstein's island and being involved with the child sex trafficking.
And when people point out that Trump is on those same lists, the response is "Oh, he doesn't count because he never actually went to the island." But they ignore the possibility that there might be other stories like his, and just say everyone else on the list is guilty.
I see people saying that Bill Clinton is a pedophile because his name is on that list, yet it's a scenario like Trump's where he never actually went to the island. But people don't care about his context.
Pedophiles always expose themselves by coming to the defense of other Pedophiles.
When real law enforcement is in place, they will know exactly who to investigate.
Like the pope? Lol.
It’s not just the shills. I’ve noticed this as a pattern of coping by all of the leftists. I noticed it first when Epstein first arrested. The same leftists that said it was a conspiracy theory that there was a guy honey trapping powerful people luring them to an island of sex with minors , and they’d profusely and with every fiber of their body scream at anyone who suggested otherwise , suddenly “knew all along” when the mainstream narrative accepted Epstein was a real thing. Absolute maddening
These people have zero integrity.
In a weird way, this anomaly works in the great awakenings favor.
Once the precipice hits and all of the truths are rolled out these gullible folks will all fold over to our side. Even if they are still just acting on lemming like responses, they will still be on the right side of things.
Total Sun Tzu move. Herd the sheep to walk into a different paddock that's gates are wide open. They may bleat that they freed themselves but that doesn't matter... sheep gonna bleat. What matters is only 4-6% will be left in their mental cages.
I think there are a lot of them who would rather 41% themselves than be associated with us.
Personally, that is a sacrifice that I think I'd be willing to make.
this is a top notch meme
u/#silvia
Will somebody please tell Pepé Silvia to pickup his mail!?
Charlie's got a whole box of...
Actually Charlie, we'll take a box of Pepés if you don't want it.
👌👍
Dear Shills,
Collectively suck us sideways.
Love,
We the People
👌👍
I remember several years back reading a blog post from David Wilcock, saying this is exactly how it would happen - that all the skeptics and haters will save face by claiming they “always knew”. I don’t know why that little tidbit stuck with me (probably because that idea bothered me) but it seems to be the case.
It would be easier to just say who isn't on it.
Oh that's right TRUMP.
But he is on it. You can't excuse him because he never actually went to the island, and ignore that many others on that list never went to the island either. Like Clinton.
Says the 30 year old day account 🤣🤣.
How does the age of my account dispute anything I just said?
https://greatawakening.win/p/17s5WHT72r/i-think-someone-just-psyoped-the/c/
Yeah mentioned 4 times: No I never saw Trump, no I never massaged Trump, no Trump didn't flirt with me, no I never had sex with Trump.
I don't understand what your argument is here.
https://greatawakening.win/p/17s5WGJcf4/epstein-drop-proves-what-we-alre/c/
What I'm saying is that people are going around saying that people on that list are child sex offenders and rapists just for being on the list.
But when people point out that Trump is on the list too, the argument shifts to "Oh, his name was just brought up and he never went to the island."
But there are other people on that list who never went to the island, either. Their names were on that list for other reasons. Yet they're still guilty.
You really don't see the issue with this?
https://greatawakening.win/p/17s5WGJcaw/epstein-docs-who-remembers-the-r/c/
Ok, I'm confused as shit here. I'm missing something important. Can someone help my dumb ass out here?
I thought that the only thing that happened was the names on the list (at least some of them) were made public. Everyone already knew the lists existed, so it's not some huge surprise.
And is Trump on the list or not? The MSM is saying he was on there, some Anons here are saying he wasn't, some are saying he was, but somehow it's different than the others.
There is no list here. This is unredacted depositions from Virginia Guifres case against Ghislane Maxwell. And this is just the first small part of it. So far nothing is really new to us anons that have followed from the beginning. But it is setting the stage, establishing the pattern with the right timing to reach a broader audience that ignored or denied it the first time around.
It’s also question and answer from depositions.
There was a list of people's names that were mentioned in documents. Trump's name was mentioned because a victim was asked at deposition if Trump had ever been to the Island and the answer was: No. Ever to the NY mansion (or was it Florida?): No. Ever to the Ranch? No.
Yes, in another post someone explained that to me.
The issue I have is that there are many people on that list of names that were just released that had similar stories.
But the problem is that if you listen to people here talk about it, everyone on those lists are guilty of going to Epstein's island and being involved with the child sex trafficking.
And when people point out that Trump is on those same lists, the response is "Oh, he doesn't count because he never actually went to the island." But they ignore the possibility that there might be other stories like his, and just say everyone else on the list is guilty.
I see people saying that Bill Clinton is a pedophile because his name is on that list, yet it's a scenario like Trump's where he never actually went to the island. But people don't care about his context.
Do you see the issue here?
Lol... that's how they roll...insane creatures.
Was he screaming it before Julie Brown ran her story at the Miami Herald?
They aren't talking to us, they're talking to the people too lazy, stupid, or asleep to already know.