Thing as well as is that if Trump gets in office, the impeachment proceedings would look further as if the rinos are trying to look like pro-Trump when they had all year to.
I agree. It's not just Democrats, it's Rinos as well. This was all gamed out and they were always going to impeach Biden and then bring in the anti-christ.
Andrew Johnson (1868): Johnson, the 17th President of the United States, was the first to be impeached. He faced impeachment for violating the Tenure of Office Act by removing Edwin M. Stanton, the Secretary of War, from office and replacing him with Lorenzo Thomas.
He was acquitted by one vote in the Senate.
Richard Nixon (1974): Nixon, the 37th President, faced impeachment due to the Watergate scandal. The House Judiciary Committee approved articles of impeachment against him for obstruction of justice, abuse of power, and contempt of Congress.
Nixon resigned from office before the full House could vote on the articles.
Bill Clinton (1998): Clinton, the 42nd President, was impeached by the House of Representatives on charges of perjury and obstruction of justice, related to his extramarital affair with Monica Lewinsky and the Paula Jones lawsuit.
He was acquitted on both counts by the Senate.
Donald Trump (2019 and 2021): Trump, the 45th President, is the only president in U.S. history to be impeached twice with sham allegations. The first impeachment in 2019 was related to allegations of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress concerning his dealings with Ukraine. He was acquitted by the Senate. The second impeachment in 2021 was for alleged incitement of insurrection following the January 6 event on the U.S. Capitol.
He was again acquitted by the Senate.
So, why is this interesting? Pattern recognition, for one, and anomalies. Nixon was the only one who resigned, and prolly with good reason, seeing as he was living in the decade after Kennedy was offed. And the WaPo suddenly seized the narrative. So, it illustrates the mad paparazzi/ semi-factual narration that magically had everyone hating on Nixon, but political puppet strings were being visibly pulled to seize power - and Ford was bad news.
The general pattern is that all the others were acquitted by the senate. So the question is: IS the pattern going to continue, or will there be a new entry, such as:
"Joe Biden (2024), the 46th president, was impeached by the House of Representatives on charges of corruption, abuse of power and obstruction of justice. The Senate upheld the impeachment."
Maybe not. Maybe they should add treason and failure to uphold the constitutional duty to protect the borders.
The problem is, there are so many things wrong with the guy, like impairment, for example, but having too many articles of impeachment will increase the chances of acquittal.
So. Strongly-worded impeachment articles against the False President? I'm curious...will there be a huge production of the impeachment articles being delivered by Congresscritters from the House to the Senate, simultaneously aired on all of the major "news networks?"
It will serve as a way to divide Americans back into their R versus D mindsets. Ds who are thinking about voting R will be right back on the D plantation, because of those nasty Rs playing gotcha politics.
Proving the 2020 election was rigged is the best way to remove him, but nooooo.
Just more political BS. A bunch of RINOs trying to look like they are trying to save America right before an election. F them.
Personally, I want Biden on the ballot.
u/#correct
Thing as well as is that if Trump gets in office, the impeachment proceedings would look further as if the rinos are trying to look like pro-Trump when they had all year to.
Me too, keep this wretched stinking corpse attached to them.
Impeachment is total BS, you don't impeach a fraudulent malicious belligerent occupier.
They need to STOP pretending he's impeachable it makes my blood boil they are continuing with this charade of him actually being president.
This was also what was said in 2020, alongside the most hated witch this side of Salem.
Rinos?!? I assumed it was the demonrats planning the impeachment. Big Mikeβs not getting on the ballot on his own.
I agree. It's not just Democrats, it's Rinos as well. This was all gamed out and they were always going to impeach Biden and then bring in the anti-christ.
This part is interesting:
He was acquitted by one vote in the Senate.
Nixon resigned from office before the full House could vote on the articles.
He was acquitted on both counts by the Senate.
He was again acquitted by the Senate.
So, why is this interesting? Pattern recognition, for one, and anomalies. Nixon was the only one who resigned, and prolly with good reason, seeing as he was living in the decade after Kennedy was offed. And the WaPo suddenly seized the narrative. So, it illustrates the mad paparazzi/ semi-factual narration that magically had everyone hating on Nixon, but political puppet strings were being visibly pulled to seize power - and Ford was bad news.
The general pattern is that all the others were acquitted by the senate. So the question is: IS the pattern going to continue, or will there be a new entry, such as:
"Joe Biden (2024), the 46th president, was impeached by the House of Representatives on charges of corruption, abuse of power and obstruction of justice. The Senate upheld the impeachment."
Maybe not. Maybe they should add treason and failure to uphold the constitutional duty to protect the borders.
The problem is, there are so many things wrong with the guy, like impairment, for example, but having too many articles of impeachment will increase the chances of acquittal.
Adding a treason charge immediately removes it to other means of prosecution
How you impeach someone who wasn't legally elected to begin with?
So. Strongly-worded impeachment articles against the False President? I'm curious...will there be a huge production of the impeachment articles being delivered by Congresscritters from the House to the Senate, simultaneously aired on all of the major "news networks?"
Yeah, I'm gonna go with NO.
Impeaching him is inappropriate, because he never won legitimately...and everyone knows it. Why do we keep bringing it up?
Wouldn't it make more sense to be talking about how to process a traitor out of office?
better be about something actually important like bribery and ukraine/burisma/10% etc and not just some lame ass shit
Whoo-hoo. Biden has 1 foot already out the door with the election only 9 months away, great fucking job republican party. golf claps.
Agreed. Uni-party gonna uni-party.
IF the republicans impeach Joe it will only be to help the deep state and hurt Trump.
It will serve as a way to divide Americans back into their R versus D mindsets. Ds who are thinking about voting R will be right back on the D plantation, because of those nasty Rs playing gotcha politics.
Proving the 2020 election was rigged is the best way to remove him, but nooooo.
again? this is like evergrande. the chinese mortgage company that has a hundred lives.
Yawn! Won't go anywhere in the Senate IF it passes the House.
I hope its time
Yawn