Remember that the Deep State has vowed to keep Trump out of the WH. There are members of the uniparty who will vote against this if ordered to do so by their puppet masters. Remember when No Name cast the deciding vote to keep Obamacare alive? I think that might have been his last vote in office as well.
Imagine how angry the white hats must have felt. Trying to repeal obamacare and it fails by a single vote. No wonder they don't even want to say his name.
This is interesting, as it gives Trump's attorney's something to put into evidence, to influence a jury.
There is another aspect. Constitution Article III, Section 2, Clause 2 states (in part): "In all the other cases before mentioned, the Supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations AS THE CONGRESS SHALL MAKE."
This clause is hard to find, and the key is hard to see even when it is before your face, but it clearly states a POWER OF THE CONGRESS, to direct the Supreme Court. In this case, as to the acceptance of Law and Fact. What is this declaration other than a declaration of Law and Fact? And as a trump attorney, I would argue that it applies to any J6 case before the Supreme Court as Constitutional direction of the Congress as to MATTERS OF LAW AND FACT. (I knew it was somewhere in the Constitution, having looked it up before, more than once, but it took me tens of minutes to find it.)
Now this declaration is only for the House. The Senate is not on board. But the whole question of the future is something only God knows...
Probably nothing in practicality. It's a little late.
The point, if it had teeth, would be to combat the measures in various states to keep Trump off of the ballots for inciting an insurrection via the 14th Amendment. SCOTUS takes up the case this week I believe.
Have you seen that pedo-faced slimeball Adam Schiff's constantly running ads for State Senator in CA - replacing Feinstein - he starts off by saying he is the hero for leading actions against Trump for Jan 6. He spends half his ad time saying he's the one that got that ball rolling.
SO you can imagine what this resolution passing will do to him LOSING.
CHECK-MATE indeed! Let's see WHO THE RINO-UNIPARTY folks are!!!
We already know who the rinos are. This will just make the liars, lie again.
Remember that the Deep State has vowed to keep Trump out of the WH. There are members of the uniparty who will vote against this if ordered to do so by their puppet masters. Remember when No Name cast the deciding vote to keep Obamacare alive? I think that might have been his last vote in office as well.
Imagine how angry the white hats must have felt. Trying to repeal obamacare and it fails by a single vote. No wonder they don't even want to say his name.
I like it a lot.
Now, what will this accomplish really? Will it force the outing of the RINOs? Or something else?
Insight from the pedes, plz.
This is interesting, as it gives Trump's attorney's something to put into evidence, to influence a jury.
There is another aspect. Constitution Article III, Section 2, Clause 2 states (in part): "In all the other cases before mentioned, the Supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations AS THE CONGRESS SHALL MAKE."
This clause is hard to find, and the key is hard to see even when it is before your face, but it clearly states a POWER OF THE CONGRESS, to direct the Supreme Court. In this case, as to the acceptance of Law and Fact. What is this declaration other than a declaration of Law and Fact? And as a trump attorney, I would argue that it applies to any J6 case before the Supreme Court as Constitutional direction of the Congress as to MATTERS OF LAW AND FACT. (I knew it was somewhere in the Constitution, having looked it up before, more than once, but it took me tens of minutes to find it.)
Now this declaration is only for the House. The Senate is not on board. But the whole question of the future is something only God knows...
u/#correct
Q the spot light 👀
Probably nothing in practicality. It's a little late.
The point, if it had teeth, would be to combat the measures in various states to keep Trump off of the ballots for inciting an insurrection via the 14th Amendment. SCOTUS takes up the case this week I believe.
The man is a genius!!
Have you seen that pedo-faced slimeball Adam Schiff's constantly running ads for State Senator in CA - replacing Feinstein - he starts off by saying he is the hero for leading actions against Trump for Jan 6. He spends half his ad time saying he's the one that got that ball rolling.
SO you can imagine what this resolution passing will do to him LOSING.
Matt's action in essence is yet another strongly worded letter. This time it will surely work! 😂
Once again, bring the scum to the top. Scum always floats.
Ooo. I like seeing all their votes on this. It will expose the RINO/Globalists unless they lie, of course
I'm not sure that would help other than to suss out the RINO's. And that's something.