Precedent Trump taking it to the Supreme Court again.
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (25)
sorted by:
If Trump doesn't have immunity then neither does Obama, Biden, Clinton, Bush ...
Yup
God Bless President Donald Trump, his wife, family, legal team, friends, Q followers, the Voters that support Trump, the Military that supports the Constitution and Trump, Law Enforcement that too supports the Constitution and Trump, most of all Trumps security team and their families too, God Bless America, Bless the missing children and you the reader Too.🙏
You are assuming that -
A) they won't just grant immunity to past presidents after this is over, which of course they will because this isn't about law
And B) Someone will bring charges against any of the aforementioned
I dont get how people cant see where this is headed. Its so freaking obvious.
What’s obvious to you? The only thing I see is that the court system is being elevated above the Presidency. Unelected people have more power than those we elect.
First off, the US is NOT a democracy, we are a Republic. Huge difference
Secondly, I'm glad SCOTUS isn't elected and I wish we could get the 17th Amendment repealed.
And finally, the people who get "voted" into office don't answer to We, The People. They answer to the party leadership and which ever lobbyist has the most $$$ on the table.
Really, where's it headed ?
EDIT: Downvoting is fun! Seriously though where's it headed
I'm just statng the obvious
It's evident they aren't going by the rule of law so how can we point to the law for precedent?
I'm not even saying it's not leading where everyone, including myself, wants. However, to assume so is catastrophic.
Where you make the mistake is you're assuming that every single thing that happens is the all encompassing "plan". Then you wait.
I keep open the possibility that it may not be and I should be ready for what actually does look obvious-they plan on fucking Trump over. Forget the legalities.
Which option do you think is better for preparedness?
They will. This is all a show.
You're assuming that "biden" is the legit president, too.
There's nothing legit about him.
Which proves my point. They aren't going by the rule of law, but we're using lawfare to say "Boomerang! We got them now!"
Will these morons never learn?
Dingdingdingdingdingding
I see what you did there with the title. :p
Ooh, I missed it at first. Thanks for pointing out out. Love a good patriotic play on words.
Which party tends to have more crooks and scumballs than the other(s)? So which side would benefit the most if the SC rules in favor of Presidential immunity?
I really don't know what to think of all this. I feel like it's a case of "damned if you do, damned if you don't."
Heads or tails oh look your guilty anyways
Cementing the precedent in stone. They really ran face first into this trap. Make it rain!🔥
I can't wait for this to go to SC(R)OTUS for them to deny immunity so we can really get things moving. If he doesny have immunity, no POTUS will. Which is something that should've been the case all along. How can a POTUS do their job without immunity? By following the letter of the law, like what was intended in the first f@cking place!
It depends when they try the case that's a factor to be considered another factor to be considered is Trump can pardon himself. It all depends on the sequence of events.
By Sam Cab(r)al
Is he just collecting cases for scotus to fuck him all over in just one day?.