Since the keystone of the international banking empires has been government bonds,
it has been in the interest of these international bankers to encourage government
debt. The higher the debt the more the interest. Nothing drives government deeply
into debt like a war; and it has not been an uncommon practice among international
bankers to finance both sides of the bloodiest military conflicts. For example, during
our Civil War the North was financed by the Rothschilds through their American
agent, August Belmont, and the American South through the Erlangers, Rothschild
relatives.
the Illuminists couldn't take over the nations with a hard-backed financial system.
global dominance, through fiat blackmail & "debt" is the only way they could "invade" every country & rule them.
when people realize fiat "debt" is literally meaningless, thus income taxes are useless, hopefully people stop paying in & playing the game.
we as citizens are not party to the signing of any agreement(s) to a central bank. they have no say over what we do with our earnings, no matter how we come about them.
To bring forward future earnings, you need a liquidity provider. And herein lies the rub.
The provision of future earnings is based on your expected energy from the future.
Meaning, credit creations is based on you.
The other possibility is to pay from savings. These can be pooled.
As long as the idea is, to earn more energy from bringing energy forward, the misconception remains.
Money in and of itself, of it's very nature, is a private affair. Public money also is a misconception. What is possible to do, is agree on weights and measures. As long as it remains there, you are the creator.
The moment another entity, be it private or public, becomes the sole creator of money, you lose sovereignty and freedom.
No more needs for loans? Sounds even more odd. I'm guessing people have been borrowing from others for centuries, before banks even came into the picture.
Since the keystone of the international banking empires has been government bonds, it has been in the interest of these international bankers to encourage government debt. The higher the debt the more the interest. Nothing drives government deeply into debt like a war; and it has not been an uncommon practice among international bankers to finance both sides of the bloodiest military conflicts. For example, during our Civil War the North was financed by the Rothschilds through their American agent, August Belmont, and the American South through the Erlangers, Rothschild relatives.
From the bottom of Page 23 https://ia803007.us.archive.org/23/items/nonedarecallitconspiracy_201904/None%20Dare%20Call%20It%20Conspiracy%20-%20John%20Schmitz.pdf
Makes you wonder why birth certificates are printed on bond paper. Slave much?
One of the best concise redpill videos on this absurd debt based and fractional reserve system. https://youtu.be/iFDe5kUUyT0
That's a good one, but I prefer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4XL8s1BEdk
Nice, that's a Great one too.
the Illuminists couldn't take over the nations with a hard-backed financial system.
global dominance, through fiat blackmail & "debt" is the only way they could "invade" every country & rule them.
when people realize fiat "debt" is literally meaningless, thus income taxes are useless, hopefully people stop paying in & playing the game.
we as citizens are not party to the signing of any agreement(s) to a central bank. they have no say over what we do with our earnings, no matter how we come about them.
I just filed my federal taxes and wanted to vomit at how much of my income goes to these bastards. It’s criminal.
To bring forward future earnings, you need a liquidity provider. And herein lies the rub.
The provision of future earnings is based on your expected energy from the future. Meaning, credit creations is based on you.
The other possibility is to pay from savings. These can be pooled.
As long as the idea is, to earn more energy from bringing energy forward, the misconception remains.
Money in and of itself, of it's very nature, is a private affair. Public money also is a misconception. What is possible to do, is agree on weights and measures. As long as it remains there, you are the creator.
The moment another entity, be it private or public, becomes the sole creator of money, you lose sovereignty and freedom.
This brings us back to living within your means.
Do you have someone who will loan you money and not charge you interest?
No more needs for loans? Sounds even more odd. I'm guessing people have been borrowing from others for centuries, before banks even came into the picture.
u/#correct
I agree that the banksters have caused a mess and are evil.
But after that issue, I am still left wondering how to afford to buy a house? Not a mansion... just a reasonable starter home... I don't have $115K
Most don't...if that holds for a while , the price will drop because some NEED to sell.
No loans at all. Houses will find their True VALUE Price and the World will be a better place.