Holy crap, that’s the most Illuminati cabal Twitter profile ever 😳
33, the triangle hand symbol, the “secret society” reference… So much for being discreet, she’s blatantly advertising it.
I always thought OJ was guilty, but damn, this has me wondering if he was falsely setup to ruin him, like how they went after Kanye when he tried to leave the Deep State enslavement.
Could Bill Cosby have been railroaded as well, because he was a positive influence on black men? 🤔
I have no skin in this game, but this could just as easily be read as:
Now that OJ died, all accusations I make towards OJ can't be defended. I can say whatever I want and there is zero proof or rebuttal of it occuring other than my word. Trust me bro.
If Cats wants to ban me for being critical of their methods, then they're free to do so. It would only serve to prove my point.
Any mod of this site has a job, and that is to serve these boards. While certain topics may be deemed against the rules and thus be removed, having an opinion in the comment section should not EVER be grounds for removal.
Cats has repeatedly stepped outside their bounds as mod, and is the only mod I've seen do this.
It is my opinion that Cats, due to repeated aggression and hostile stances against frens due to their opinions, should be relieved of their duties as mod.
I got banned for a day for reporting posts that had nothing to do with the great awakening. For instances, my dog is getting treatment, my sister had a baby, etc. the mods banned me for excessively reporting.
I had been unfairly perma-banned for commenting my opinion on the use of direct energy weapons under a thread pertaining to said usage.
I wasn't banned for posting a thread, but merely commenting my opinion under that thread. I had no prior violations or mod actions against me previous to this comment.
Cats was just personally offended and used their power as mod to ban and gatekeep.
Cats, you need to take a step back and evaluate your reason for being here. Is it to espouse what it means to be a fren and be committed to the common goal, or is it to stroke your ego and be a massive douchebox to the people here, thus dissuading their participation?
I suspect it's time the mods come together and reevaluate your position.
I would argue that we're at a point where we have evolved to encompass more than just the Q posts and discussion surrounding; That we have grown to seeking all truth that those sleeping have been unaware of.
Q was our origin and what brought us together in pursuit of truth. Now we must be free to dig, to discuss, to find.
For instance, the dog getting treatment should be allowed to remain because Fenbendazole, like Ivermectin, has been theorized and is said to be useful in dogs and humans against cancer. That post is an experiment to test said theory. As an informational and direct experience, it should remain.
The sister having a baby is likely a prayer request, which should always be allowed. If we don't like it, we can downvote it and move on.
It shouldn't be up to the mods to determine what is viable information and what is drivel.
It should be up to us, collectively, as a group. In this regard, had many more of us agreed with you and also reported a post to the point of action, THEN it should fall under mod review.
A single rogue mod should not have the power to ban posts or comments or frens.
Again, Cats has gone beyond these parameters and I disagree strongly with this.
See: ⨻ in her bio?
You see her crazy posts? She hates Trump with a passion.
Her fingers form a similar sign.
Holy crap, that’s the most Illuminati cabal Twitter profile ever 😳
33, the triangle hand symbol, the “secret society” reference… So much for being discreet, she’s blatantly advertising it.
I always thought OJ was guilty, but damn, this has me wondering if he was falsely setup to ruin him, like how they went after Kanye when he tried to leave the Deep State enslavement.
Could Bill Cosby have been railroaded as well, because he was a positive influence on black men? 🤔
Hmmmm, Cosby gave me negative vibes
And 33, secret society
A lot of NDAs seem to exist to help facilitate crimes or other evil doing. Maybe an NDA longer than 2 years should be illegal.
Actually, this has been proposed, and I support it
I support this as well
What's up with this broad? She loves Jack Smith and throwing illuminati signs... don't trust her.
Nice win.
I now wonder who else will die and have their NDA go public.
I have no skin in this game, but this could just as easily be read as:
Now that OJ died, all accusations I make towards OJ can't be defended. I can say whatever I want and there is zero proof or rebuttal of it occuring other than my word. Trust me bro.
Duplicate. Please remove. (Joking)
Is Minet a real name? Russians will be laughing because it means BJ in Russian🤣😂
The Kardashians should be ashamed of themselves. They should remove themselves from the public eye but mostly because they're ugly and stupid.
First thing I noticed was the hand signal in the thumbnailed avatar(kinda hard to miss...)
Why now? 29 freaking years? We don't really care. Attention seeker.
Do you know what "NDA" stands for? NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT. The guy only died YESTERDAY, you fucking ignoramus
Wasn't it just yesterday someone was wondering why the board is less lively?
Hostile mods that have no business being mods, particularly this one
Yikes, here comes your one day ban in 3….2….1….lol
If Cats wants to ban me for being critical of their methods, then they're free to do so. It would only serve to prove my point.
Any mod of this site has a job, and that is to serve these boards. While certain topics may be deemed against the rules and thus be removed, having an opinion in the comment section should not EVER be grounds for removal.
Cats has repeatedly stepped outside their bounds as mod, and is the only mod I've seen do this.
It is my opinion that Cats, due to repeated aggression and hostile stances against frens due to their opinions, should be relieved of their duties as mod.
I got banned for a day for reporting posts that had nothing to do with the great awakening. For instances, my dog is getting treatment, my sister had a baby, etc. the mods banned me for excessively reporting.
I had been unfairly perma-banned for commenting my opinion on the use of direct energy weapons under a thread pertaining to said usage.
I wasn't banned for posting a thread, but merely commenting my opinion under that thread. I had no prior violations or mod actions against me previous to this comment.
Cats was just personally offended and used their power as mod to ban and gatekeep.
u/catsfive can confirm this is what happened.
Cats, you need to take a step back and evaluate your reason for being here. Is it to espouse what it means to be a fren and be committed to the common goal, or is it to stroke your ego and be a massive douchebox to the people here, thus dissuading their participation?
I suspect it's time the mods come together and reevaluate your position.
I would argue that we're at a point where we have evolved to encompass more than just the Q posts and discussion surrounding; That we have grown to seeking all truth that those sleeping have been unaware of.
Q was our origin and what brought us together in pursuit of truth. Now we must be free to dig, to discuss, to find.
For instance, the dog getting treatment should be allowed to remain because Fenbendazole, like Ivermectin, has been theorized and is said to be useful in dogs and humans against cancer. That post is an experiment to test said theory. As an informational and direct experience, it should remain.
The sister having a baby is likely a prayer request, which should always be allowed. If we don't like it, we can downvote it and move on.
It shouldn't be up to the mods to determine what is viable information and what is drivel.
It should be up to us, collectively, as a group. In this regard, had many more of us agreed with you and also reported a post to the point of action, THEN it should fall under mod review.
A single rogue mod should not have the power to ban posts or comments or frens.
Again, Cats has gone beyond these parameters and I disagree strongly with this.