Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes)
Democrats REJECTED Bill Authored By Senator Shannon Grove To Make The Buying Of Children For Sex A FelonyDemocrats then hijacked her bill forcing amendments & denying Grove's efforts to protect 16 & 17-year-old children from being purchased as part of comm...
it's not already a felony??
This.
I believe this bills purpose was focusing sunlight on this evil and keeping the conversation front and center. A mandate is being built. A mandate that is required for Trump to do the things that need to be done because it isnt going to be pretty. What happens when its down to the paid psycho-/ sociopaths and the 4 to 6 percent? We are approaching those figures.
This is slavery, right?
13th Amendment. It's alreay illegal.
the buying of any person, regardless of age, should be a felony.
They’re all kiddie diddlers. That’s why they rejected the bill. Sick fuckers.
First of all, this is a California bill, not a federal bill.
Second, one of the people on the committee that changed the bill to make only 15 and under a felony is Scott Wiener. Scott Wiener is working unlawfully without an oath: https://gwsandiego.net/blog/?p=1608 (Wiener is next to last, so scroll all the way down).
I notified him and the State Senate leadership that Wiener is working unlawfully, but they didn't make him sign an oath: https://gwsandiego.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Ltr-Regulators-re-no-oath-20-state-senate-commitee-pdf.pdf (see page 7)
Since one of the committee members was working unlawfully, this means that the committee's work is void and the bill can be restored to its original form. I have notified Shannon Groves of this, but she seems to not be utilizing this strategy to restore her bill. Her crocodile tears make me sick.
I am currently working on a Writ of Quo Warrento to force Wiener out of office, but I don't have much time to work on it and it is going very slowly. I am trying to get people in Wiener's district (the San Francisco Bay Area) to start a public humiliation campaign over Wiener refusing to sign an oath, but no one I have contacted wants to do it. :(
Time for state legislatures to step up
This was a State of CA bill, not a federal bill. It was revised by the usual pedo pushers in the legislature.
Thank you.
Of course they reject it, 'cos they're in on it, full-on, pants down.
First of all there shouldn't be a bill to say buying of children for sex is a felony. But then again, its a clown world, right? Common sense need to be explicitly made a law, a policy. We pray that hammer of thor come down hard on all of those who support these heinous crimes.
Do we know if the bill was purely about this or was there other stuff injected into it as usual in DC
This was CA, not federal
Oh gotcha. Couldn't access the post
Because they all worship moloch in solidarity. Get it yet?