Yes, in my country the greenhouse gardeners add CO2 to get a competitive yield, of e g. tomatoes. They do this by burning hay or other leftovers from the fields.
One can say that this is quite a nom-de-plum: "SPACE BALLS ARE US" where we take out CO2 and give back injectable CO2 & H20 into the earth's crust...HMMMM...
Question: IF ENOUGH of this nonsense was "injected" back into the earth, wouldn't that start the "cooling of the Earth's Magma Core?"
NOW, what could go wrong...Chemistry doesn't lie unless the lie is told enough times!!! Just sayin'!!!!
Focusing on the atmosphere, which is 0.041% CO2 and trying to make it 0.040% CO2 over time, while consuming a big electrical load -- what could be more efficient???
So, injecting materials mixed with water into the aquifer is a good thing. Is there any proof that this procedure will not taint the water or prevent the aquifer from filtering ground water in the future? Since it is not mentioned I'm gonna guess NO.
Isn't this gonna suffocate all the plants/trees that breathe in CO2?
Which is gonna further feed into the "Global Warming" psyop?
Yes, in my country the greenhouse gardeners add CO2 to get a competitive yield, of e g. tomatoes. They do this by burning hay or other leftovers from the fields.
We used to drop dry ice in water in our grow closet back in the day.
Does that use dry ice? Ours was a bit more primitive. Tin foils, lights, and dry ice in a bucket of water a few times a week. Ahhh... The 80's
If it makes you feel any better this thing is insanely inefficient.
Governments always are.
Wow. Space balls IRL. What a time to be alive.
One can say that this is quite a nom-de-plum: "SPACE BALLS ARE US" where we take out CO2 and give back injectable CO2 & H20 into the earth's crust...HMMMM...
Question: IF ENOUGH of this nonsense was "injected" back into the earth, wouldn't that start the "cooling of the Earth's Magma Core?"
NOW, what could go wrong...Chemistry doesn't lie unless the lie is told enough times!!! Just sayin'!!!!
We need more CO2, not less.
carbonMONoxide is the bad thing, NOT carbonDIoxide. stupid leftists...
Focusing on the atmosphere, which is 0.041% CO2 and trying to make it 0.040% CO2 over time, while consuming a big electrical load -- what could be more efficient???
Liberalism truly is a mental disorder.
I was imagining Kamala sitting spread eagle.
You and I know what it's really $ucking...
Mega tier money laundering.
You would think Aliens had landed and geo-engineering the world to suit them.
Yeah I think the biggest carbon sinks are in Brazil and the Congo and Indonesia. Lol
If this machine breaks down and releases all of the CO2 it has captured, it will kill everyone in the vicinity.
So, this thing is sucking up all the natural plant food in the area.... Got it.
What could go wrong??
Commie leftists produce exactly the opposite of what they claim to be doing. Everything they do is destructive.
So, injecting materials mixed with water into the aquifer is a good thing. Is there any proof that this procedure will not taint the water or prevent the aquifer from filtering ground water in the future? Since it is not mentioned I'm gonna guess NO.
Why aren"t they sucking up cow farts?