Supreme Court rules gun 'bump stocks' ban is unlawful
(www.nbcnews.com)
Comments (34)
sorted by:
Good. Now do the same for 3-round burst actions.
I suspect it is leading up to all the restrictions being removed.
Although i am accepting of your 3 round burst lifestyle, i would still choose my single shot per pull. I would not want to impose on your lifestyle ever lol.
What one does to their criminals is none of my business.
Likewise, bit single shot aure saves $$ for the consistent practicing shooter
Of course, but it's about the principle! "Civilian variants" are also stupid.
hahah i can't wait to go visit the gun boards.
I bet they are hot and active.
https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/441198/Lord__others_png-3240704.JPG
Thank you for the link
Analysts said it was a ruling against regulators who make up the laws instead of Congress who is supposed to make the laws.
Exactly, and this was addressed to ATF several times.
ATF's rule making is the biggest active threat to national gun rights, Congress hasn't had the political will to enact anything for decades now.
We need to challenge the “more than one bullet with a single pull of the trigger’ ruling in regards to Bruin...
I suspect all the rulings will be challened now.
How do y'all square the fact that this ban was originally imposed by Trump?
I mean, he took the typical gun grabber handbook of "ban all the things after tragedies", used it to ban an item that merely assists, not enables, bump firing, and it turned into an ATF dickstomp after all 3 of his appointees said "You are not the law, merely enforcers, keep in your lane".
Not everything is 4d chess, but it's getting pretty close here.
I had a friend who was big into guns and believed Trump was anti-gun because of this ban. I tried to explain that it would get struck down eventually and maybe Trump knew that and it was a move like sacrificing a pawn in order to get bigger things overturned. He couldn't get it.
Your explanation is very plausible.
Good question. Still looking for a answer.
Can I put a few on Ebay lol
Good question since this ruling came out. lol
Had to slip that Vegas bullshit in there... Tell them all what REALLY happened in Vegas, MSM mockingbirds... good for nothing pieces of 💩
The truth will be exposed about Vegas.
Already was... you know that. Whether the mockingbird will ever tell the whole truth to the braindead normies is another matter.
Why would the Mockingbirds ever tell us the truth ? Thankfully this has been ruled on and more rulings coming as Buyden demands more gun control.
Now is the time to buy one from the hoarders
How many liberal bodyguards were hoarding them?
glad i didn't fomo
I say this with so much contempt, disgust, and disrespect that she deserves; What a dumb ass fucking bitch. (Sotomayor)
Legal definition of a "Machinegun"
SOURCE: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/5845
To reiterate; Legally (and technically correct) a "machinegun" is a firearm that shoots more than one round with ONE pull of the trigger.
Perfect example; burst. If you squeeze the trigger ONCE, and 3 bullets are shot by the gun AUTOMATICALLY.
Know how many rounds are discharged by a firearm equipped with a bump stock?
One. Each. Time. You. Pull. The. Trigger.
When you pull the trigger on a bump-stock equipped rifle, ONE bullet is shot. It isn't until you pull the trigger a SECOND TIME that another shot is fired.
Sotomayor just said that a chicken has 2 legs, makes weird noises and lays eggs, therefore a chicken is a duck.
Nope; 2 completely & totally different animals.
So dishonest. Not that I'd expect anything else from the commies, but stil......
Thank you for sharing this. They have always lied to push their agenda.
LITERALLY always...... Never forget that.
Yet Schumer attempted to make a law banning them despite this ruling.