Time will tell for certain, but the fact that Obama got rid of him, and tried to warn Trump off hiring him, plus the fact they went after him to get him out of the Trump administration speaks volumes about which side he is on.
Throw in the fact that every shill dogs him constantly in an effort to destroy anon support for him, and I am left with little doubt which side he is on.
I agree with you on this point, but would need to do a lot more research on what it was he was really trying to do there. Maybe it is in the interest of both parties. You certainly aren't going to get that from the times. Not saying that you don't have a very good example. I'm just saying that there are few things like this that can be taken at face value. However, blindly trusting most any public figure at this point is counter to everything that I have learned to date.
Time will tell for certain, but the fact that Obama got rid of him, and tried to warn Trump off hiring him, plus the fact they went after him to get him out of the Trump administration speaks volumes about which side he is on.
Throw in the fact that every shill dogs him constantly in an effort to destroy anon support for him, and I am left with little doubt which side he is on.
Summed up nicely with the information generally available here.
No, obviously. He was forced to quit and went on trial for his freedom. They would never do that to one of their own.
Considering Trump literally pointed at him and told him to stay healthy cause they have a lot of work to do coming up here tells me no, he’s not DS.
Look at it this way: would Trump have chosen Flynn as National Security Advisor if Flynn was on the side of the deep state?
I'm still neutral on Flynn.
Anyone who trades off their U.S. military service to enrich themselves from a foreign nation is akin to a traitor in my book: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/10/us/politics/michael-flynn-turkey.html
The opinion of anyone who uses the NYT for information on anything should not be trusted.
The link doesn't matter if the story is legitimate. Would you prefer this one? There are dozens of others: https://progressive.org/latest/michael-flynn-forgotten-turkish-connection-erlich-200520/
You're an arrogant ass. I never called you out for your bullshit.
I agree with you on this point, but would need to do a lot more research on what it was he was really trying to do there. Maybe it is in the interest of both parties. You certainly aren't going to get that from the times. Not saying that you don't have a very good example. I'm just saying that there are few things like this that can be taken at face value. However, blindly trusting most any public figure at this point is counter to everything that I have learned to date.
Don't trust anyone.
Flynn is a patriot. I think he's a viable VP candidate.
It's not about if Flynn is good or bad in my view.
Would Flynn be able to tell the intelligence community to go to hell if the time comes?
Trump would for sure. Would Flynn?
I am sure Flynn still has a lot of friends in the IC.
No. But he is a spook.
I sure hope not. There are those who you just really hope are on the side of good. He is one of mine.