"A Private Citizen Cannot Criminally Prosecute Anyone, Let Alone a Former President" - Clarence Thomas Questions Jack Smith's Au...
Conservative Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas questioned Jack Smith’s authority as special counsel in his concurring opinion on the high court’s presidential immunity ruling.
Uncle Clarence is gonna go down as the savior of this nation. He’ll be mentioned with the founders.
Amen, he helped break the chains of evil that tried to enslave us.
“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.” - Samuel Adams
Thank you. Excellent reminder.
Agree
PLEASE GOD KEEP SAFE CLARENCE THOMAS
Amen, and pray for all the leaders and their families and those in harms way and their families. That are bringing down this evil.
We had prayers for france and their election. This week they have elections in the UK. Please say prayers for all Gods children in the UK also. We have will a busy week with prayers.
Thank you for sharing this message.
Keep Wetworks away
Prayers for you, Brother Thomas!
Brave man held out for 30 years and now that the Calvary has arrived he is taking no prisoners.
Is there room for 2 on Rushmore ?
I join you in this prayer. Amen
I've always been astounded that Bush Sr. actually appointed such a giga-based justice.
Thankfully he did even if by accident.
This is the benefit of life-long appointments. Not all improve, but those who can learn to think for themselves, unburden by politics, etc.
Amen.
AN interesting twist in his opinion, is that the prosecution of course cannot continue, till Congress makes the office by law, and the SC is appointed by law.
However, asserting that the Smith lacks the capacity to be SC, would also mean all his actions are done in a private capacity and, purporting to be an official or officer, which he is not. Smith is an imposter.
Merrick Garland overstepped his bounds. And thus it can be construed to be a conspiracy to deprive rights.
It remains an amazing fact to me none of these justices have come up with the idea to check 241/242?
Further more, IF it is held that Smith is an imposter, then all his acts are null and void, meaning no legal power is emanating from it. Which also means that the remanding to the court for the remainder of the INDICTMENT is failing as well and should be considered null and void.
And this leaves the SCOTUS with no question to remand.
Thank you for sharing this.
God bless this man and keep him and his family/friends safe.
Amen
Ok so, an elected President of the US has immunity.
So, if a person is acting as a US President who isn't legitimately the President, you know cheated in the election. Does this person have Immunity???
I assume this opinion holds no force?
They will go back to ignore the courts.
There's nothing to ignore here.
What Thomas wrote has no more force than what the losing judges wrote in their dissents.
It's not want this case was about and what he wrote is not part of the majority opinion.
It's like a bonus track on a CD or a DVD extra
Perhaps it will help guide or aid Judge Cannon as I believe she apparently is the one that will be addressing this subject.
I think it's a signal to her, but legally it holds no weight and she should ignore it. It's almost 100% why Thomas thought to include this.
Every judge who looked at this question found the opposite.
I suspect they will ignore SCOTUS, Jackson did this in the past.
Yes, it seems this is not part of the ruling today.
When we called it kabuki theater we nailed it.
Amen, great reminder and thank you.
CT 🏆