James Woods: You think it can’t happen here?
(twitter.com)
Comments (23)
sorted by:
Entire cities have been taken over here. Look at that screwed up state called michigan.
And Minneapolis.
Maybe the Crusades actually occurred for a reason.
i think you may be right.
They were defense. Time to think about crusades 2.0.
They're using our laws & culture against us. They preach 'tolerance' while in the minority, but there is no 'tolerance' once they out-breed us. They simply change the law.
Islam is a religion of violence. Invasion, rape, forceable conversion, killing those renouncing or otherwise trying to leave ... all valid responses to spread the infection. You will obey, or you will stop breathing. When it comes to the ragheads, there's no other options.
All the hard work our ancestors did. All the technological wonders we created. All the infrastructure - they will take over everything. But they won't maintain it. They'll have a good run, for a generation or two. Then things will start falling apart. Won't really hurt until they do something stupid, like falsify nuclear plant safety records, or mis-handle the nukes they inherit.
That's assuming they make it that far. I suspect as soon as they get their hands on a western nuclear arsenal, they'll start pushing on China (Ughurs retaliation), or even satellite Russia states. When they start losing, the nukes come out. While I believe the ragheads are perfectly willing to use them, I doubt they'll do so with precision.
In the end, the result is the same - nuclear winter. Truth be told, I no longer care. I'll be dead by then.
I've spent the last decade talking with people, taking flak at work for my opinions, writing letters, getting out the vote (so to speak). I sincerely doubt there are enough left to reverse the process now. I'm still going to fight. Still spread the word. Still encourage others. But I think I'm just fighting a rear-guard action now.
Then they will fight among themselves, Sunni against the Shi’a against the Ahmadiyya against the Sufi
I can see about two alternatives for the futures of European countries, and neither one is peaceful coexistence. Either the migrants manage to take over because people here will not wake to the situation fast enough and in big enough numbers, and what is left of European cultures and people will be destroyed, maybe violently and fast, or just suffocated a bit more slowly.
The other one: an uprising if enough of the natives figure out fully what is happening and get angry enough to fight. In which case the end is not going to be nice for the invaders, maybe not even for the ones who have tried to really assimilate. Nor for their women and children.
If the latter happens it will not start everywhere at once, and there may be countries where it will not happen at all, in which case we may also get wars between countries here again. Who knows how that will end...
I'm in Finland, and right now I am pretty happy I never managed to have children, nor have any really close people in the younger generations, as their future does not look bright. Frankly, and I thought I'd never say anything like this, but the best alternative for us might actually be if Russia actually decided to invade, and took over here. Although I presume they won't. Not worth the trouble. Unless maybe you lose your fight in the USA and the cabal decides to push them into that war between NATO and them whether they wanted to fight or not.
This right here is a major part of the problem.
What did Longshanks say in "Braveheart"? Something like if we cant throw them out, we will breed them out, and then he granted the nobles Prima Noctis?
In my case it wasn't intentional. But I was always a bit weird, and none of my attempts to find a man to start a family with worked. High IQ and fat - in my case the latter also seems to possibly be due to some sort of problem with hormones or gut bacteria or who knows what, I nearly died of malnutrition when my mother tried to wean me because I could not hold anything inside, puking and diarrhea, then when I finally could I started to steadily gain weight. I have never lost much, not even when I was working at a job that had me walking kilometers per day in Lapland and far enough from stores that I had no choice but to stick to the daily ratios because otherwise I would have ran out of food before I could go shopping the next time, and as I was trying to lose weight I was more or less calorie deficient for the whole summer. Didn't lose any weight.
Yep, I wasn't good enough for anybody I would have accepted, and all I wanted was somebody I could have talked with on an equal footing, but what I like to talk about is pretty much everything - space, ecology, ghosts and what they might be, spaceflight, the moon and how it might have come to be, could Mars be terraformed, how animal species spread from one location to another, should we try to restrict that or just allow nature to takes its course, how climate works and why human caused global warming etc looks kind of shaky... looks like most guys aren't interested discussing stuff like that. At least the ones I tried to do that with usually bolted sooner or later.
Im sorry if you took my comment as picking on you. I wasnt. I see this attiude everyday among the young people who work for me and my comment was speaking about this attitude being prevalent among that age group in more general terms.
But yes, younger people have that, and I have seen it happen more than a few times: a woman doesn't even think about children because being too focused on her studies, then her career and having fun etc, then when they realize they actually would want to have at least one they are already getting a bit old and somehow now it always looks like the wrong time one way or another - and then they are too old to get pregnant.
Sorry for the guys who would not want to carry the whole financial situation mostly on their shoulders, but what we have now really doesn't work all that well. Women are most fertile in their late teens to late 20s, and start to lose that fast after they turn 30, so that is really the age most should have their kids. Even if that means they will not be as successful in their careers, and the father has to support the family mostly on his own for some years - unless some other support system could be figured out.
Probably should not be a government job, that, though.
To mine and her mothers greatest dismay, our youngest has never wanted children. I used to tell her that biological clock would bring her back to sanity but she will be 38 in September. Times running out.
And I am the greatest grandpa of all time. (hehe) My grandkids all get to shoot guns when they come over.
Sorry, it's just that I was a bit picked about the whole thing when I was younger so I am a bit sensitive. Especially since when I was still of child-bearing age it started to become more common for women who wanted children to just have them even if they hadn't found anybody to marry. I didn't want that, I wanted a real father for them if I was going to have them, and I guess that was seen as rather old-fashioned.
Almost all of the native Europeans have known what is happening. Some of them just don’t care. They’ve been convinced that being antiChristian and antiwhite is rewarded with high social status, more employment opportunities, and less hassle from the traitorous authorities. The sellouts figure they’ll reap the benefits during their lifetimes and not worry about what happens after they’re dead. Angela Merkel, for example, has no children and no chance of having children, so she has no direct biological connection to the future beyond her lifetime. So she figures she might as well sellout and “enjoy” her current life.
It’s really gross.
It’s why the satanic global communists have attacked Christianity so relentlessly. Christianity has people value people and things beyond themselves. It makes people want God’s will to be done on earth as it is in heaven. Heathens taking over Christendom is not God’s will.
Maybe, maybe not. I have seen more people, especially young men, getting pissed off. And increasingly willing to show it. Could be just simple biology, their territory is being invaded by strangers, they know it no matter what they are being told, and it angers them. Part of the older generations might follow if enough of the younger ones simply get enough and make their thoughts clear to everybody.
And it doesn't have to be a majority, or even close to that. But whether we will have enough willing to show what they think, and enough who think the same and become willing to show it too, and act on it, after they learn they are not alone, for a preference cascade to happen, remains open. It might, it might not.
Some people have always been pissed off about it. It’s good that number is increasing, because that will entice more of the cynical ones who want to appease the side that looks like it’ll win.
It probably already is.
The difference is there's enough of us that know how to do stuff and, although it's madenning that our shitfuck politicians have put us in this position, we can move somewhere else and 'get on with it'. Whereas our visitors' stated intention is to just take over by numbers, but with no thought as to how they will provide for themselves and run even a basic society once they've achieved that goal. And imagine what a miserable life it must be when that's your sole reason for being and doing what you do day in day out.
Sounds like South Africa.
I like James but the reality is that until he starts talking about who the REAL enemies are then he is obfuscating truth......not too much unlike Gateway Pundit who I like as well even though they REFUSE to be truthful about a certain Country.
There's only one way back. But 99% of people who say they could stomach it, couldn't
It is