Everyone on this Commission should be considered Public Enemy #1. Names taken and addresses noted. They should all know their days are numbered. Then reconsider what they are doing to their fellow Nationalists.
Twitter does that anyway with hiding comments under banners like "probable spam" where most people dont click into them so your "reach" is limited, even if you pay for Twitter Blue. Thats why i dont pay these people a cent for it.
No, its usually pretty innocuous comments just from undesirable patriot accounts.
I spoke to a musician account and his post just replying with the word "Indeed" was hidden under a "Probably spam" tag, which means its his account they are censoring NOT his specific post!
Really dirty shit. Cant support Elon whilst this is going on im afriad.
can we just make the social medias public utilities already? We know they were created using taxpayer money (dark money), and they will probably continue being targeted with this kind of temptation and pressure. I think it would be harder to do if their status was updated.
If it's public they can be charged with a crime because the gov't is not allowed to censor people. If it's "private", that's a loophole where they technically can.
It's not a loophole if it's at the government's behest. Even then I would have to see some very, very old SCOTUS rulings that say that the Constitution does not guarantee protections even when private companies are involved.
We've already seen high profile cases where a ToS is not as binding as these companies hope already, so waiving one's rights have to be more intentional than they'd like.
They were requesting it, not demanding it, though they probably threw their weight around in ways that are illegal in "persuading" the companies to censor...
The Constitution binds them from demanding it, but what if a company "just agrees with them" and censors people? They can reference the establishment doctrine, if that's a thing, to say "it's OUR site, we can do what we want. Don't like it? You're free to go somewhere else."
But here's the thing regarding these Big Tech Social Media orgs: it's NOT their site, it belongs to the TAXPAYERS.
If we declass the documents surrounding their funding & startup (In-Q-Tel, CIA, DARPA, etc) it will be made clear that they are not "private companies who can make their own rules", but they are in fact PLATFORMS owned by We The People.
But TwitterX did accept partnership deal with 'GARM' (Global Alliance for Responsible Media), which is WEF-affiliated and an anti-Trump, election-rigging operation.
I am still shadow banned on X. What is hilarious is when people like me are shadow banned. I think the last real conversation I had was when jan6 was going down and I messaged the dc police about that fed dude. I must of got the full ban.
Occasionally something will reply to me but it is always the same type of thing. They think they are being clever but the joke is on them. If our government is spending all its time going after tax payers and not real threats. That is some sick stuff.
I used to hike a trail at a local park and after jan6 and that communication there was a weird guy in the parking lot and I parked and noticed him sort of staring at me. He started to walk towards me and then stopped. That day I did not go for the hike. It is in a tree secluded area. 100 percent speculation on me, but if not someone from the government it was someone randomly doing something weird. Never seen him there again after that
Fuck the EU.
Everyone on this Commission should be considered Public Enemy #1. Names taken and addresses noted. They should all know their days are numbered. Then reconsider what they are doing to their fellow Nationalists.
EU Government committing treason against their people, as usual.
Twitter does that anyway with hiding comments under banners like "probable spam" where most people dont click into them so your "reach" is limited, even if you pay for Twitter Blue. Thats why i dont pay these people a cent for it.
Yeah I don't think a single post I've seen under "probable spam" is spam.
No, its usually pretty innocuous comments just from undesirable patriot accounts.
I spoke to a musician account and his post just replying with the word "Indeed" was hidden under a "Probably spam" tag, which means its his account they are censoring NOT his specific post!
Really dirty shit. Cant support Elon whilst this is going on im afriad.
can we just make the social medias public utilities already? We know they were created using taxpayer money (dark money), and they will probably continue being targeted with this kind of temptation and pressure. I think it would be harder to do if their status was updated.
And put them under the same jackholes pushing the censorship?
If it's public they can be charged with a crime because the gov't is not allowed to censor people. If it's "private", that's a loophole where they technically can.
At least based on what I understand of it all...
It's not a loophole if it's at the government's behest. Even then I would have to see some very, very old SCOTUS rulings that say that the Constitution does not guarantee protections even when private companies are involved.
We've already seen high profile cases where a ToS is not as binding as these companies hope already, so waiving one's rights have to be more intentional than they'd like.
They were requesting it, not demanding it, though they probably threw their weight around in ways that are illegal in "persuading" the companies to censor...
The Constitution binds them from demanding it, but what if a company "just agrees with them" and censors people? They can reference the establishment doctrine, if that's a thing, to say "it's OUR site, we can do what we want. Don't like it? You're free to go somewhere else."
But here's the thing regarding these Big Tech Social Media orgs: it's NOT their site, it belongs to the TAXPAYERS.
If we declass the documents surrounding their funding & startup (In-Q-Tel, CIA, DARPA, etc) it will be made clear that they are not "private companies who can make their own rules", but they are in fact PLATFORMS owned by We The People.
Created and made on our dime = ours.
Public Utilities are now For Profit. (I have been fighting them for over a Decade) by helping people go Solar..(itβs not perfect but itβs a start)
Gues the secret dal with the others, is secret no more.
But TwitterX did accept partnership deal with 'GARM' (Global Alliance for Responsible Media), which is WEF-affiliated and an anti-Trump, election-rigging operation.
https://rumble.com/embed/v546n6h/?pub=18557
https://x.com/Safety/status/1807793931003768991
https://harbingersdaily.com/is-the-wefs-global-alliance-for-responsible-media-vying-for-your-mind/
Can Elon Musk just buy the EU and take over?
Bwahahahaβ¦.. EU faggots btfoβ¦..
Fvck you & the fine!!
https://i.imgflip.com/8wrhvz.jpg
"Blocks access to data for researchers"? Can a Euro tell me what that law is for/about?
Elon still can't be trusted
Your Opinion....
Okie dokie
Pretty bold of him to say this considering the fact X is STILL a heavily censored platform. π
I am still shadow banned on X. What is hilarious is when people like me are shadow banned. I think the last real conversation I had was when jan6 was going down and I messaged the dc police about that fed dude. I must of got the full ban.
Occasionally something will reply to me but it is always the same type of thing. They think they are being clever but the joke is on them. If our government is spending all its time going after tax payers and not real threats. That is some sick stuff.
I used to hike a trail at a local park and after jan6 and that communication there was a weird guy in the parking lot and I parked and noticed him sort of staring at me. He started to walk towards me and then stopped. That day I did not go for the hike. It is in a tree secluded area. 100 percent speculation on me, but if not someone from the government it was someone randomly doing something weird. Never seen him there again after that