Yesterday, allegedly, a kid with a rifle climbed atop a roof, in plain view of witnesses, and managed to fire off multiple shots at President Trump, from less than 150m away. The world record sniper kill is over 2 miles. A professional would not have missed yesterday. So, if they want Trump gone so badly, why haven't they taken him out? Yesterday showed me that if they wanted him dead, it would not be difficult, at all.
Comments (28)
sorted by:
The average battle rifle is effective at 500 yards. This a-hole was at a prone position on a building located 150 yards away. How is this allowed to happen? Calling it a mistake or oversight is 100% bullshit. No legitimate security detail would allow that position to be unguarded.
Mathematically, he forgot to take the Coriolis effect into account ... Therefor it is not a pro but a lone wolf and perfectly deniable.
Regardless, the fact that is the SS failed miserably at their job.
Coriolis effect on a 150M shot? I doubt that's enough distance for it to matter.
I was being facetious .....
OK cool. Cuz coriolis only comes into effect >800M.
Seriously?
It was by the grace of God that he's alive.
Are you using this phrase as a thought stopper?
See, it answers nothing and makes you stop thinking. Seriously, you want to go down that path?
Consider: freethought and thinking for yourself in the Q-posts.
No one is killed by the Grace of God.
You are SAVED by the Grace of God.
Thank you. You are confirming my point.
So God has also kept the deep state from placing a capable shooter in a window, 300-500m away from a Trump event? Seriously?
Are you that stupid?
Would you care to explain wtf ur talking about instead of just slinging negativity?
You commented that God put a shooter there.
God made it so that Trump turned his head and didn't get shot in his head.
Nope, you're confused. You literally do not understand what I am saying. Take care. God bless.
Yes
James 1:17: "Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights, with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning."
I think we’re looking at the concept of plausible deniability at play. It’s much easier to deny claims of a conspiracy when a young, inexperienced person is the shooter.
There is maybe another angle we might miss: Who is in control of the police forces in Pennsylvania, the biggest mail-in ballot stuffing prepared state?
https://rumble.com/v56x6pu-the-secret-service-director-failed-dan-bongino-reacts-to-trump-assassinatio.html
Either way, the fbi knows both very well. Was likely told he would be martyred if he succeeded. He did not. He just died. The sniper that took him out was watching every move well after shots were fired. THERE'S NO FUCKING WAY THAT AN HONORABLE AND MORALLY SOUND LEO WOULD HESITATE!!!
Their MO is always the Lone Wolf.
The stench grows.
Trust me it's really difficult and there are people in LE who are really good at their job...
Respectfully, you are not thinking! What if whether Trump lived or died was secondary to the purpose of the enemy staging the event.
I believe you have missed my point. Clearly my fault, since others seem to not have understood my underlying question as well. It has nothing to do with what happened last night, aside from the fact that we clearly saw Trump is not as well protected as he could or should be.
Do you believe the deep state wants Trump dead, or has wanted him gone at any point in the past 8 years? Regardless of who is in control at this point? I was simply wondering why, if the CIA, FBI, NSA, etc are at least partially corrupted, and the deep state is so blatantly desperate to get rid of Trump, and it seems they would do ANYTHING to maintain control, why have they not managed to actually take him out, when after last night it is clear that there are "holes" in his security.
To simplify it further; is the deep state really so incompetent that despite their seething hatred for Trump, they have not managed to find someone who can take him out, even if it would result in a civil war?
If Trump was efficient taken out by a professional clean hit, it would directly point back to one of those agencies.
Since the hit was not the primary objective, but secondary to the affect the hit manifested, what do they care if the person who committed act can shoot straight of not.
9/11 pointed back to the agencies. Even JFK pointed back to the agencies and half of Americans didn't believe the story at the time. So, when they are back against the wall, about the be exposed and lose their grip on power permanently, why would they not just say fuck it, and take him out, even if it blatantly was an inside job? Surely civil war is preferable to losing control of the globe for them. My original question still remains ignored.
I agree that may be their ultimate step, but everything is done in degrees.