Evidence of TWO(!) shooters confirmed: Trump assassination attempt
(www.youtube.com)
Comments (34)
sorted by:
This makes the inside job make even more sense.....set up a patsy to take the hit and then sell the public on "we messed up, whoops" .
No wonder they tried to sell us sooooo hard on "He acted alone"
JFK assignation playbook to a T
And quickly. Here is his passport, I mean his dna evidence.
The dark shape that everyone is assuming is a person is really just the shaded portion of that round thingy on top of the tower in really low resolution. The illusion of movement is a visual artifact created by the compression of the video that was taken of the tower.
Agreed
Exactly. And just thinking through it, the position (assuming a pro intent on escape) makes no sense. High visibility, poor LOS / angle, complicated and high risk exit availability.
I was saying just this yesterday when this theory first popped up
Ok will look again but still multiple witnesses talking about the tower to consider as well.
But a shadow cast onto what? The air?
I am not convinced it's a person, yet, but I don't understand how it can be a shadow.
You do realize that when the sun shines on one side of something, the side of it not shined on still has a shadow that, relative to the surroundings, is much darker?
Ah, that makes sense. Ididn't read your comment carefully enough.
Lone Gunman is NEVER the case!
Right. There were probably a handful of them, all synchronized with those little radio transmitters to fire at the same time. Except this time, they didn't have a driver to fire the final fatal headshot. Thank God.
One reason Trump stood tall to show everyone he was okay.
I've been looking for the SAIC or in civilian terms the INCIDENT COMMANDER, (I.C). This is very important information, In my opinion this was a woke woman within the SS. Who has in the past had negative comments about 45.
Damn, I think I'm beginning to believe this "second shooter" theory.
“If you swing at the king, you’d best not miss.”
We know this involved gov agents, without a doubt. We know the gunman could not have acted alone.
If so, there’s no way that those people would leave everything up to a 20 year old, even if he had extensive training, which he didn’t.
We don’t know the details, but just like with JFK, there is no way there was only one shooter if the shot was at range. One or more people would have absolutely been in place as crossfire/insurance/control.
Even people with no military training like myself know to secure the perimeter you need to put somone at the highest spot. There shouldve have been snipers on that tower & on the roof where the patsy was killed.
I saw both the kenyan & w go to the Ed Sullivan theatre for the David Letterman show & hours before either showed there were snipers perched all over the roof tops in NYC on Broadway & 53rd street.
I just thank GOD that Trump was not killed.
"Now they all pay"
where's the msm with this type of analysis??
Lol best joke all week
I don't know about the water tower. I do believe someone was up there based on the videos. But I can't see that being a shooter. Coordinator, maybe. I think the second and possibly 3rd shooter was possibly inside the building the kid was on, and another in a tree somewhere to the right of the building and water tower. I think the tree shooter's job was to take out or at least delay the counter snipers on the roof while the kid and the real shooter takes their shots. I'd love to go there and check that tree line for evidence of someone climbing a tree or shell casings.
I would think since the tranny MK Ultra subject was setup as the patsy, the 2nd shooter would have been a pro, and wouldn't have left behind any loose evidence, but, the FBI was there shortly thereafter, to police up stray shell casings, or any other evidence that a #2 was there.
Thought military was still protecting Trump… This makes no sense.
Yeah, none of this makes any sense.
The International - classic setup.
I LOVE that movie!!
So many questions.
I wonder if Space Force (or even Elon) has some convenient satellite footage.
People had said a shooter was on the water tower, they were right.
Starting at about 11 he analyzes the shots.
He says the first three shots are from the same weapon. More muffled with no echoes and farther away than the next 5-7 ones.
The next 5-7 shots would have been from the Secret Service returning fire from buildings much closer to the stage.
could be, if they fired that many . . .
It sounded to me like those 5-7 shots were further away, and then there was another single shot... and then he says the return fire was not until a 6 seconds (I forget) later, but he doesn't have that on the video. In other words, shots 1 - 3 and then the additional 5 shots plus another shot (9 total) were not the USSS.
According to Trump USSS sniper took out Ree Tardey Oswald with a single shoot (shot #7?)
What I want to know is, immediately after Trump enters the SUV, why does the soldier in fatigues, as he's talking on his headset, suddenly level his rifle and appear to aim it directly at Trump through the windshield for a second before lowering it