I agree. Also, why is the blood on his neck bright red- fresh, and the blood on his face looks brown- dry? And the blood on a "hot" metal roof is red and not brown?
It’s a riser. There’s no one on the water tower. The sun was low on the horizon, the left side (west) is illuminated. The east side is a shadow, which matches the right side of the storage tank. The “movement” is pixelation and matrixing.
I am looking at the videos of the water tower on a very large monitor that is 4K. I definitely see two figures. Not simply 'shadows and pixelation', in my opinion.
Below is a closeup of the actual tower from Google maps.
Thank you for providing these links. It does clear up the issue about the pixelation because if you go by what appears to be two people - one dressed in black on the shadow side and one dressed in white on the sunny side - they'd have to be giants. I've worked with digital imagery enough to know that pixelation is an issue. I will admit that I thought that these pixelations were persons. It's now obvious that they are not when you see the scale of the catwalks and ladders.
Of note, It doesn't mean there wasn't anybody up there. It just means that these pixelations obviously don't represent anybody who might have been up there.
If the shooter was on the water tower trums head would have been blown off regardless of how much he turned it. The angle was wrong for that shot. Here is a better explanation.
The open window behind and over the shooter's right shoulder:
That depends on the skill of the shooter. The water tower shooter was supposedly in a crouched position, not lying down. Nor did he have a surface to steady his rifle, except possibly the railing. I'm no marksman, but at that distance and considering these disadvantages, I would think it's possible that he missed the target altogether and Crooks' bullet may have clipped Trump's ear. If they were able to retrieve most of the spent slugs, it would be interesting to see if they were the same caliber and all shot from the same gun. If not, then how many different guns? I just think it's silly to discount the possibility of a water tower shooter when the indications of a set-up are so strong.
You're assuming it was a "random camera on the water tower all day." Plenty of people in the crowd that day, and most with cell phones. Is it so unreasonable to think that someone saw it and filmed it?
I'd say the possibility of a sniper on the water tower is more believable than one soy boy shooter. Wouldn't you?
This is a video of the rally, it's just zoomed into the water tower. You can see this video has 4 different zoom levels on it. The water tower is just the very upper left portion of the original video (hence why it is such low resolution)
If they were ordered to stand down form the water tower, this may be one reason why...
https://x.com/I_Am_JohnCullen/status/1814742351765778638
I like the open window behind and to the right of the kid.
Much better.
This.
Could be both. The photos of the dead 20-year-old show no shells around him. He may have been taken out before he got off a shot.
Could they have shot at Trump from inside the building behind the kid out of the windows?
I agree. Also, why is the blood on his neck bright red- fresh, and the blood on his face looks brown- dry? And the blood on a "hot" metal roof is red and not brown?
Definitely something on top of the water tower. Maybe 2 large figures, one in white and one in black.
It’s a riser. There’s no one on the water tower. The sun was low on the horizon, the left side (west) is illuminated. The east side is a shadow, which matches the right side of the storage tank. The “movement” is pixelation and matrixing.
I am looking at the videos of the water tower on a very large monitor that is 4K. I definitely see two figures. Not simply 'shadows and pixelation', in my opinion.
Below is a closeup of the actual tower from Google maps.
https://www.google.com/maps/@40.8587397,-79.9698624,3a,39.3y,97.43h,104.38t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s8p75Mo7MgLh7XpgdY3UlnQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?coh=205409&entry=ttu
Note: you can move the image around if you want and can zoom in or out.
You can see the ladder is on the back side (opposite of the rally side) allowing for the shooter to climb up without being seen by the rally goers.
Check out this video showing how to climb a water tower and what's on the top:
https://youtu.be/enRpkFPzxHs?si=I1JnRm2xbmAsdObg
Thank you for providing these links. It does clear up the issue about the pixelation because if you go by what appears to be two people - one dressed in black on the shadow side and one dressed in white on the sunny side - they'd have to be giants. I've worked with digital imagery enough to know that pixelation is an issue. I will admit that I thought that these pixelations were persons. It's now obvious that they are not when you see the scale of the catwalks and ladders.
Of note, It doesn't mean there wasn't anybody up there. It just means that these pixelations obviously don't represent anybody who might have been up there.
Your monitor isn’t at issue, it’s the video, which is massively zoomed in.
You’re entitled to our opinion, we’ll just agree to disagree.
Watch the water
If the shooter was on the water tower trums head would have been blown off regardless of how much he turned it. The angle was wrong for that shot. Here is a better explanation.
The open window behind and over the shooter's right shoulder:
https://greatawakening.win/p/17teSXiUXD/the-shooting-angle-reveal-about-/c/
That depends on the skill of the shooter. The water tower shooter was supposedly in a crouched position, not lying down. Nor did he have a surface to steady his rifle, except possibly the railing. I'm no marksman, but at that distance and considering these disadvantages, I would think it's possible that he missed the target altogether and Crooks' bullet may have clipped Trump's ear. If they were able to retrieve most of the spent slugs, it would be interesting to see if they were the same caliber and all shot from the same gun. If not, then how many different guns? I just think it's silly to discount the possibility of a water tower shooter when the indications of a set-up are so strong.
The angle of shot from the water tower would not have been able to clip his ear. The open window and the shooters position could have made that shot.
My question: Who just happens to have a random camera on the water tower all day, and then puts this out? Is it real or to cause confusion/division?
We just need to be “spin” “what if” careful Anons.
You're assuming it was a "random camera on the water tower all day." Plenty of people in the crowd that day, and most with cell phones. Is it so unreasonable to think that someone saw it and filmed it?
I'd say the possibility of a sniper on the water tower is more believable than one soy boy shooter. Wouldn't you?
This is a video of the rally, it's just zoomed into the water tower. You can see this video has 4 different zoom levels on it. The water tower is just the very upper left portion of the original video (hence why it is such low resolution)