LIVE: President Trump Delivers Remarks at Bitcoin Conference in Nashville
(rumble.com)
₿ DECENTRALIZE THE FROG 🐸
Comments (68)
sorted by:
President Trump will deliver remarks at Bitcoin Conference on July 27, 2024, at 3 pm ET.
Newsmax is covering this for anyone who wants to DVR...
I'm so grateful Trump is speaking here today! Bitcoin standard is the golden arches of our economic freedom and national security. Excited this knowledge is getting out there in a big way. Finally! 🧡
Those who said Trump was against it never read or didn't understand Trump's "Art of the Deal". Or Sun Tzu's "Art of War"
Those who said Bitcoin is a scam are in the place I was about 5 years ago. My deep research journey to prove my sons wrong, ended up making me a bigger fan of it than them. I spent a solid year researching Cryptocurrency and Blockchain technology while caring for my terminal mother during the covid lockdowns. Many quiet hours at her house bedside while she slept, I occupied my down time with it. I learned that most objections I had were misunderstandings on my part and not seeing the bigger picture. While it's not perfect, it eliminates so many problems we have today. I only wish I had realized it sooner.
Sorry about your Mom...💔🙏🤍
Thank you. She was a true patriot her whole life and Q follower with me since 2018! I so miss our discussions. ❤️🇺🇸
How about the issue of 90% of bitcoin being held by hedge funds? Wouldn't that skew meaningful adoption of it as a currency?
90%? Source on that? Pretty sure you just made it up.
Yes, I just made it up.
Bitcoin being bitcoin, identifying who owns what is ... quite a puzzlement. You could probably assume that the top 1% of today's society owns the same percentage of bitcoin as the percentage they own of the rest of the economy.
Regardless of the precise unknowable number, the point is that an entrenched elite under the old system leveraged their corruption over time to become incredibly wealthy, and even their small hedge of bitcoin is likely to be magnitudes larger than the general public. Therefore, if we restart the economy with bitcoin, we'd be restarting with a deck stacked against the American worker, and stacked in favor of the owners of the legacy cabal system.
To me, that's a good enough reason to presume bitcoin won't become the standard, despite the numerous benefits of blockchain.
I think your assumption is exactly wrong. Remember that Bitcoin, when it first started back in 2009, was worth nothing. There were websites hosting “faucets” that would give you free bitcoins. And then after a few years it was worth a few pennies and started to gain traction as a currency for drug-selling websites like the Silk Road.
It’s more likely the holders of most Bitcoin were computer geeks, cryptography nerds, libertarians and druggies who used Silk Road.
According to other panels at this very same conference that trump talked at, the institutions are still researching and dithering over whether to buy Bitcoin. The elites you speak of are very slow moving so bitcoin’s 15 year existence is a mere eye blink to them.
Bitcoin is your chance to get in before all the bankers, VCs, hedge funds, etc. it’s the exact opposite of a typical investment opportunity that is only afforded to Accredited investors.
I wouldn’t be surprised if blockchain is NSA tech leaked by white hats as part of the Q operation. Unfortunately many of you are just believing low effort FUD rather than doing your own research. Look deeper.
You could be right. Knowing who owns the pie is currently impossible. Even if it's as you described, it'd still be biased. A more satisfying bias than what I presumed, but I get the feeling that Q wants to look after the grunts as much as the generals, if not more. A completely subjective viewpoint, but there it is. So I think it's a temporary part of the op that will fade away. Obviously just an opinion. By all means, mine away. It's not like I am advising people to stack something else; I'm just skeptical that it's the end solution.
Distributed ledger systems have been around for centuries at least. But tech has definitely made them much more robust. It's a good thing overall.
Owned.
There is nothing wrong with Cryptocurrency and blockchain. Most people who are against BtC aren't against those technologies, indeed, most are for those technologies. I personally think they are the future for sure. What I am against is Bitcoin for about a thousand reasons, none of which are that it is a cryptocurrency or that it uses blockchain tech.
It perpetuates some of the worst problems we have. There are other uses of blockchain that solve them. BtC is not the path.
I am open to researching more on why BTC would perpetuate the worst problems we have. Definitely interested in that perspective. Can you direct me? Thanks!
That is based on my own years of research into what those problems are, how our monetary systems have been created, who created them, and how they were used to fuck with the economy and control the populace. Here are a couple of problems that BTC does not solve:
This is the biggest offender in the history of currency fuckery. All currency without value was created by people who used it to grab power and enslave the people they forced to use it. No one uses a non-valued currency unless they feel they have no other choice. The only reason people today would even consider using BTC is because we have been trained for so long to believe that this is a viable solution that we have completely forgotten what it is like to use a currency with intrinsic value. The moment that there exists any currency with intrinsic value, any currency without it will be thrown away like the useless trash that it is.
Let's look at an example. Would you trade something that you have that you consider valuable, say a car for example, for something with intrinsic value, that you know other people will want, or something without value, that some people may want, but most would prefer the other stuff that has actual value?
I suggest that once the option is available, NO ONE will use a non-valued currency when a valued currency is available. BTC has exactly zero intrinsic value.
The second worst offender in history regarding currency fuckery is fractional reserve lending, which BTC does not solve, but isn't explicitly a problem with BTC either. It is however potentially a BTC problem that BTC doesn't address directly. I don't blame BTC for this. This is more of a general problem with the populace not understanding how big of an issue fractional reserve lending is.
The third worst offender of currency fuckery through time is hording. BTC is almost certainly already horded up the ying yang. It is likely that more than 90% of all BTC is owned by a single effective entity (hint: there is only a single corporation in the world). Relying on a single currency ensures that anyone who can horde it, will horde it, and in so doing can manipulate the entire economy and indeed, enslave the people, manipulate the government, etc.
1&3 are two of the biggest problems with currency in history, and BTC does not solve them. If it doesn't solve two out of three of the biggest problems with currency in history, and is still potentially subject to the second biggest problem, how then is it a "solution* to our currency issues?
If Bitcoin is going to replace everything and be our only currency/store of value, then I agree with everything.
But....What if Bitcoin isn't intended to become the ONLY currency or intended only as a place to store / transact large amounts? Why do we need one currency? It doesn't have to be all or nothing. That's just something we were deliberately conditioned to believe.
Bitcoin can exist along with other crypto currencies and a gold backed currency (on a Blockchain) or even the current US dollar for those who want to still use it. Let the people and private business decide what they want to transact/trade/borrow or be paid incomes with. (free market)
We need to get to the point where central bankers and the government aren't deciding what the value of our currency is worth and limiting alternative forms of transacting. As I said in another post, if a business owner wants to accept cupcakes as payment for their product/service. Then they should be able to in a free country. Central Bankers shouldn't need to make cupcakes a legal tender and decide how much a cupcake is worth and track it so they can tax it.
The people need to preserve their freedom to make their own choices and decide what has the most intrinsic value for them. We are more than an economy.
This is just my simple late night two cents. I don't have the answers, but I can see your concerns being an issue if we end up in a bitcoin only world. Much of that could happen in a gold only world too. Decentralization and freedom of currency choice is the only answer to me.
No it cannot. They cannot coexist, it is impossible. NO ONE would choose to trade for a currency without value when a currency with value exists. Please try to come up with any scenario where one would do so. I am fairly certain you won't, since no one ever has.
I agree completely. The path then is obvious; we mustn't tie ourselves to a single medium of exchange. On the contrary, the only possible path forward that solves all the problems is a blockchain tied pseudo-barter system.
Again, 100% agree. The problem is, if there are a thousand possible ways to conduct a transaction, NO ONE will choose to conduct it in a way where they give up something of value for something without it.
This isn't rocket science. A free market absolutely obliterates any trade item (currency in this case) without intrinsic value.
Agreed 100%. BTC cannot be a part of a path to this state for the reasons stated in the previous post (no value and hording). In the case of hording, any entity that hordes a currency controls it. A free market destroys hording, but it also destroys BTC because it has no value.
Again, I agree 100%. But it is completely obvious to anyone who has studied the economics and fuckery of the past, that BTC can't solve these issues that we both agree on. Indeed, it can't even be a part of such a solution, because it has, quite literally, nothing to offer.
Where did I suggest or imply anything about a "gold only world?" That would be just slightly better than BTC, but is still subject to hording. And indeed, the hording of gold has been a major driver of the world's economic history, and all it's fuckery, which is why I placed it as "number 3" in my "worst economic fuckery list" above.
The value is decided between the parties involved in the transaction. Whether it be through a barter or an exchange of currency.
I see it this way. If the dollar crashes and a large company's biggest corporate customers are only offering to pay using Bitcoin. I think the company will see value in accepting that Bitcoin.
Unless of course the US has banned it in advance, because they plan to use the dollar crash panic to force CBDC. Which could happen while we're all being kept divided by arguing imperfections, while the enemy conquers. Time is running out.
I love your title..."worst economic fuckery list" lol!!
Agreed. The decision of how much something is worth is weighed based on a things intrinsic value and it's extrinsic value. Intrinsic value is the value a thing has no matter what a person believes its value is. For example, Silver has value as the best elemental conductor of both heat and electricity. It has value because it does not oxidize in the interior (it creates a patina, a stable oxide layer instead of "rust", an unstable oxide degradation like iron). It also has lustre, sheen, and visual appeal. This means that in industry, for electronics, and in jewelry (along with plenty of other real world use cases) it will always retain its value, no matter what you, or your would be trade partner believes.
No matter what a person is trading for, or what a person values their silver at, the silver never loses these valuable properties because they are a fundamental part of the universe.
BTC has zero such value. It can't be used for anything that would give it meaningful value.
BTC can have extrinsic value, because anything can have extrinsic value, and that is the "value decided" on that you are talking about. You are conflating the idea of extrinsic value (which both silver and BTC have) with intrinsic value of which only silver (in this comparison) has.
Again, in *ANY barter situation where one has a choice to trade for something with intrinsic value or something that has none, no one would EVER choose to trade for the thing with no intrinsic value.
Not if there is anything (like silver) that has intrinsic value that they could trade for instead.
Is Bitcoin tangible?
Is it Constitutional?
Is it a pyramid scheme to enslave those who don't have the knowledge of it?
Is it safe? What does it depend upon? Energy?
How does it fit in the 20 things on Trump's platform, particularly the item to make the U.S.Dollar the world currency? Or did I read that correctly?
Is Bitcoin minted?
It does not "depend" on energy. MINING IT depends on energy. Once it is mined, the energy used to mine it is gone forever. You can never recoup that loss.
As tangible as the dollars in your bank account. Arguably more so, since you can actually hold your own private wallet and put it on physical storage.
Why wouldn't it be? It's a transparent decentralized ledger with a finite supply that is not controlled by anyone so no one can manipulate the supply like the Federal Reserve does with the dollar. Just like no one can print more gold out of thin air, the same is true of bitcoin.
BTC was originally freedom money but it was hijacked and has been turned into something it was not designed to be. It was supposed to be peer to peer digital cash, but the peer to peer function has been degraded to the point that it's impractical to use it that way.
If you're talking about security of your own funds, it's as safe as you make it. If you're talking about the network as a whole, it's safe as long as anyone in the world is maintaining at least one copy of the blockchain. The entire internet could go down and yes it would still be safe. Energy is a factor only for miners.
I don't know the 20 things you're talking about, but as far as the dollar, if it became tied to BTC like it used to be tied to gold, then the dollar would become sound money once again.
It is mined, not minted, and anyone with the resources and desire can do it. There are no specially designated entities who can punish you for mining without a license.
What kind of physical storage? A safety deposit box?
Where is the ledger? Who has access to it? Can it be corrupted?
Who owns the ledger?
How do you spend bitcoin at a farmer's market or a kids school fundraising popcorn sales?
How does one know how much bitcoin they truly have? Is Math required? Or is counting sufficient?
Does the value of bitcoin change? Why? Who sets its value?
Is it true currency or currency already corrupted by fraud and misrepresentation?
Link to the 2024 RNC 20 point platform: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/2024-republican-party-platform
(Truth stands up to scrutiny.)
What is required to be a bitcoin miner?
Lots of options: Encrypted thumbdrives, specially designed hardware wallets, an old cell phone, and for backups you can etch your private key into steel.
Anyone can download the full node software and retain a copy. It's completely public and permissionless. No one owns or controls it. There are tens of thousands of copies around the world, all constantly checking each other to make sure it's not corrupted.
No one!
Just talk to the merchant, have them set up a wallet and then scan their QR code.
The wallet software automatically keeps track of your balance. If you have multiple wallets or coins other than BTC it gets more complicated but there are multicoin wallets that support that too.
No one "sets" the value. it's determined by supply and demand. BTC max supply is 21 million, released according to a predetermined inflation schedule over the next ~140 years, USD supply is essentially infinite, therefore BTC is deflationary over time relative to USD.
Since it can't be directly controlled, TPTB have tried all kinds of tricks to manipulate the market. The biggest issue is Tether (USDT), which is basically a private entity that prints its own tokens and claims 1 USDT = 1 USD, but they have no backing whatsoever, and they will use this to buy up BTC when economically convenient for the big institutions. For whatever reason, people just accept it, but it is the elephant in the room when it comes to BTC's "store of value" proposition.
Thank you for your patience with my questions. I have a few more if you are willing.
How does bitcoin affect the money supply now and in the future? Will economic reporting, banking, and insurance industries have to change to support and include bitcoin? Will it be costly? Will it contribute to further inflation due to these implementations costs flowing into the costs of goods and services passed on to already strapped consumers? Will utilities costs increase to families because of the AI and bitcoin energy consumption?
Will bitcoin be mandated? Will it be like the Electric Vehicles of the financial industry?
Think of Bitcoin less as a currency and more as a way to store and transfer larger amounts of money outside the bank's and Government's control. Especially for small and big business.
A gold/silver backed blockchain currency for day to day transactions (notes/coins) would be amazing.
Businesses wouldn't need to be forced to accept any of it. It can be a choice for them. If a customer offers Bitcoin to buy a car and the dealer says, no they don't accept Bitcoin. Fine, the customer can go to another dealer and the dealer can just sell to someone else. Or vice versa. The consumers will drive the demand as they always have. When credit cards came on the scene many businesses jumped on board right away, others took awhile and some still don't accept them. Same with personal checks. Consumers also have the choice to transact with cash, debit, credit. Freedom of choice needs to remain.
Amen.
No problem! Thanks for asking good questions.
I can't see the future obviously, so it's anyone's guess what will happen, but if you think about those other industries you mentioned, how would they work if they weren't based on a currency that can just arbitrarily print more units whenever needed?
What if the government did not have monopolistic control over the money supply? What if they had to provide a real service and earn their money like the rest of us?
Most people earn their money by trading their time and energy at a day job. Your time is finite and scarce, but the currency you earn is infinite. What if you ignored the USD valuation of bitcoin and focused on earning directly in a currency that you know will appreciate relative to USD? What if you had access to cheap energy to run mining rigs at home, and they earned enough to totally offset your energy bill and then some? Could you quit your job and dedicate more time to doing what you love? Spend more time with your family? Improve your quality of life? Start a business?
u/#classywow
Thought provoking.
Exactly. As silly as it sounds. We should be able to buy/sell with anything we want. In a truly free country, if I want to accept cupcakes as payment for the widgets I make and sell to my customers then I should be able to! If my employees want me to pay them with cupcakes then I should be able to. The government doesn't need to approve "cupcakes" a legal tender. It's not a central bank or the government's business to set a value for the cupcakes I transact with. Nor is it their business to process, or track for the IRS to get a piece of either.
I believe Trump just wants to preserve our right to participate in Bitcoin and even a gold/silver backed currency along with existing methods and let the consumers drive the demand. As the US dollar crashes (as we see happening), these other alternatives need to already be in place so people can shift to whatever works for their situation at a time that works best for them. We have to prevent the sudden panic the Central Bankers need so they can push the CBDC on us. When the dollar as we know it is gone, Bitcoin doesn't have to be everyone's personal or business choice. We will have options. And we need to preserve that freedom of choice.
No. Can it become constitutional? yes.
Think of what Trump said about the Republic ......Listen carefully.
Yes. But everything is. It is called supply and demand.
No. If you have no knowledge, it is better to stay off. That said, obtaining knowledge is a matter of effort and desire. It is your choice to know.
Start small. Test it.
On energy for sure. Then also Internet access, and .....
But remember: it is an asset. Not a payment system anymore. If you want to pay something, use Bitcoin cash (BCH). You can be up and running within 5 minutes. And ready to receive payments within a second against a 10th of a cent. If you want to be secure and anonymous: use Monero.
Safety depends on your threat model, and frankly, on your own behavior.
Is it skilled labor? Does it come out of the ground? Then it's worth nothing... just like FRNs or any other currency.
The nakamoto or whatever made up name is bs, Putin is behind it and the goal is to hurt the dollar.
Blockchain technology is it's only redeeming quality and BTC doesn't have a monopoly on that.
I'm comfy with my physical assets chained to a pitbull with AIDS.
Putin, really?
Yeah really.
I see lots of dv fags 👋🏻👋🏻👋🏻
You can't dispute anything I said... voting with your emotions like a fag again.
Ain't worth squat when the power goes out..."No no trust me bro it's in my wallet online..." 😂😂😂
Eagles, buffalos, brass and lead get food, fuel and necessities EVERY time, everywhere. "Bro trust me...muh wallet thing" Sorry. Tangibles only. I still haven't seen any "Cash for BTC" shops around...you?
Are people really so retarded they can't see the only reason Trump is mentioning BTC is to get Bernie bois and youngsters on the Trump train? Duh ... tell me you're smart enough to at least see that.
BTC... it's like a religion with these people..."trust me bro..." You guys crack me up.
Some things people just have to seek out knowledge themselves. Just as we sought out the truths that brought us here.
I could fire back with some insults but I do actually know how to control my emotions.
Meh... we're all frens here. There's no hate. Good friends break balls. That's just how it is.
Your system doesn't work. Most people buy shit online, and, as much as I love silver/gold/etc., you aren't doing that with coins. Like, I guess if you sit at home all day prepping your system works, but most people don't do that and that will never become the accepted financial system countrywide.
Even in a best case scenario where people start getting outside and buying almost everything locally, there still needs to be some way to transfer money online for certain things.
Maybe instead of worrying about "muh coronal mass ejection" or some other wildly unlikely nonsense, you could actually research a comprehensive solution and what that may look like. You've already got long-term blackout covered; what about other scenarios?
If it came down to it, I could barter with PM. People are willfully ignorant if they believe BTC is superior to physical gold or silver in a survival situation. The impending economic crash qualifies. People are in for a real rude awakening...I agree everyone should hold some digital currency, but also diversify with PM and cash.
What do you think a farmer will be eager to accept, PM or BTC? Nothing like getting laughed off a farm when your kids are starving..."Next! Please move along sir...bu but muh digital wallet!!!" - You're kidding, right?
Nah...I like things I can hold in my hand. It's how my people survived for hundreds of years. But you do you...free country and all that. In a world of bait and switch, some of us are beyond tired of the bs and returning to our roots and ancestral wisdom. If you don't physically have it, you don'treally have it now do you? PM is money. It meets all the requirements for money. BTC is not money, it's like currency. Huge difference. If you don't know the difference, educate yourself. Seriously... find out the difference between money and currency. Few know.
Bitcoin is worth nothing when it comes down to brass tacks. It derives its perceived value from collective agreement. It's not a commodity. It has no more utility than a paper dollar, I'd even say less because you can't even shoot a spitball out of a BTC... maybe pretend you can?
There's nothing that anyone could say to prove otherwise. Like I mentioned, this shit is like a religion to you BTC people. You might as well be jojoba witnesses knocking on the door...did you see the curtains move? lol So you collect your zeros and ones, and I'll keep stacking PM, liquor, medications, lead and canned protein. And that's fine... that's your right...as is mine to do what I want - storing my time & labor in whatever container I see fit. And if it all turns out to be bunk, I'll cash it all in for BTC and we can all have a big party on the interwebs.
Desperate people will give precisely zero fucks about BTC if things keep going the direction they are going. Gotta go put my livestock up now - you have a good night. But some PM before it's too late. I'm up 60% already...
You're arguing against the cryptobro in your head at this point kek
Over here, I actually agree with virtually all of that, especially "I like things I can hold in my hand. It's how my people survived for hundreds of years. In a world of bait and switch, some of us are beyond tired of the bs and returning to our roots and ancestral wisdom."
I truly would like nothing more than a return to a more traditional system where people use silver coins to buy goods and services from their local community. I meant it when I said "best case scenario". That would be my personal ideal. Of course, part of that still includes something for online financial transactions when they occur.
My point was basically this: Aside from the ideal scenario, which I find unlikely to become the norm, precious metals only work/are only going to be optimal in a survival scenario. This is fine, but it's a solved problem if concerns over such a scenario become real: buy metals, sit on metals, repeat until shit hits the fan.
The unsolved problem is what do we replace the online system with. My suggestion was simply that crypto is the solution for that, chiefly Bitcoin.
Also, in the particular case of an economic crash: Bitcoin does really well when the dollar does really shit. Do you really think the average millennial city dweller will run out to buy precious metals over crypto if they see the dollar tanking in value? Doesn't matter if it's dumb or worse than physical gold/silver if it's what a large portion of people do. Up until the moment that the power starts going out, most people will prefer the easy thing, which is online funny money. Only once their access to their online money is visibly shown to be in doubt will most people want something they can hold. So depending on how long a crash lasted for, and depending on if Bitcoin could take over the position of the dollar before the internet/power shuts off, there may not even be a point where the vast majority of normies rush to precious metals.
And to clarify, by "your solution doesn't work", I was referring to precious metals as a kind of 'all we need' solution. If that isn't what you were suggesting, then my bad and carry on stacking fren. (Personally, I've got a pitifully small stack, but it's better than nothing)
Imagine if Trump said 'Bitcoin Cash' just once.. I think BCH price would be $5000 tomorrow..
Anyway.. hope he talks about how crypto is basically the opposite of central banking cartels.
Like, like currency manipulation?
Talking about his Uncle, Dr. John Trump, the longest serving Professor at MIT with 41 years.
"He was highly intelligent. I love intelligent people!"
Even brought up increasing energy to power the minting of bitcoin.
What is this in St. Cloud? Is he going to St. Cloud for a rally after speaking in Nashville?
Yes, President Trump will be going from the Bitcoin Conference directly to a rally in St Cloud tonight at 7 PM.
This man has stamina like no other!
Excited to hear his Bitcoin speech!
Did you like what you heard?
I didnt see the entire speech but what I did see gave me the feeling that Trump will protect Bitcoin entrepreneurs and indeed all crypto, emphasized stable coin and gave no indication that Bitcoin would be a large factor in a financial reset. It seems like what he said may disappoint BC Bros.
Did you see it the speech that way too? Im not really all that hip on the crypto stuff so Im not sure.
Jeez if only he had a double or something...lol
indefatigable
/ĭn″dĭ-făt′ĭ-gə-bəl/
Not defatigable; incapable of being fatigued; not easily exhausted; not yielding to fatigue; unremitting in labor or effort.
Synonyms Unwearied, untiring, tireless, unflagging, persevering, assiduous, persistent, sedulous.
Also famously used in Monty Python's Holy Grail!
Look for Max Keiser's talk today on the same stage. He is going all in to set Trump right on his public slandering of President Bukele.
Trump talked about a country that emptied its prisons, and sent their criminals here. That’s Venezuela, not El Salvador, where the criminals are in prison. Venezuela bragged about it, saying how their crime is down (because they shipped their criminals to USA).
Trump even mentioned Venezuela by name, in his RNC speech, saying something jokingly (I can’t remember verbatim) about maybe having the RNC in Venezuela one day, if it’s reformed.
Bukele jumped on X right after the RNC speech, because he thought Trump was talking about him, and then people like Max K ran with that… But it seemed to me, watching the speech live, that he was talking about Venezuela.
El Salvador has Net reverse immigration because things are going so well.
The problem with El Salvador's implementation of BTC is they are using the custodial Lightning Network and onboarding people through that. They essentially have a BTC-LN central bank/node and all wallets are connected through it like bank accounts.
Isn’t lightning supposed to be better?
What if nations adopted BTC-LN for their people, like an account. But er can also have personal cold storage?
There was once a financial expert who said the government through the CAFR pulls in about $50,000 a year each person. Sort of like Alaska oil payouts. Everytime a citizen is born, not to an anchor baby, they get a BTC-LN account.
Folks in Nashville said we need reparations for inflation. It was a bankers war.
If you actually look into how LN works, it's essentially a fractional reserve banking system that overlays the BTC layer 1 network which enables all the same problems of the legacy financial system that Bitcoin originally solved.
The way they want LN to work is a pipe dream though. It has so many technical problems like channel liquidity and adds so many layers of complexity that makes it so you HAVE to use custodial services unless you want to run your own infrastructure which basically requires a computer science degree. It also introduces risks such as:
There's more but like I said it gets really complicated. I've been using crypto since 2016 and I don't want to touch LN with a 100-foot pole.
POTUS comes on stage at 3:59 ET and opens with a SS joke
"I'm proud to be the first major nominee to accept donations in crypto and Bitcoin"
POTUS exits stage at 4:50 ET
Didn't there used to be a trumpcoin crypto?
It wasn't affiliated with the Trump family or companies at all.
I still am Unsure of the play on Bitcoin.. when the Market crashes, the Hedgefunds will sell off their horde of bitcoin, driving the price to nothing. then the fed will try to roll out the CBDC crap. is the Play to offer up an alternative to bitcoin holders to trade them to a gold backed crypto?.
a lot of bitcoin holders will be pissed when it goes to nothing, something is going to come in to save them, or they'll get pissed at Trump. And I don't know what that is
Rumor Elon is his special guest Boom!
Was it?