BOOOOOOOM!!!
(twitter.com)
Comments (47)
sorted by:
Ok. Glad we cleared that up... that Crooks was the shooter that hit President Trump in the ear with a bullet. Got that?!? It was Crooks... Ok. Glad we cleared that up. 🙄
The trap of the question was "crooks" the pasty not the real assassin.
My dear sister, how did he establish the bullet was from Crooks ? How is it Wray had no idea if President Trump had been hit by a bullet ? A FBI FA should have been at the hospital speaking with the Doctor as President Trump was being treated and verified from the Doctors these facts. Which raises suspicion on Wray now. This guy claiming the bullet 100% came from Crooks we like to know how he established that fact ?
I thought the same thing. That's their narrative and they're sticking to it until it all blows up in their faces..
Now they are giving us tons of leverage as they are getting caught in their lies. let them lie as much as they want to and not challenge. Then use all those lies and drop them in their laps.
Precisely
Work smart not hard.
Lol thats my mantra at work. I say this at least once per day to the kids. But I say work smarter, not harder.
lol, Thank you for sharing this.
We do also ...
Yes!
Amazing how we were discussing this topic, and now we are provided even more incrimination.
They be big trouble when it comes out that big foot is Jewish and he shot at Trump with space laser that shoots shards of glass from outer space.
Big big big biggly trouble.
They might as well tell it that way, everything else they tell us is like a fairy tale. Only thing missing in their testimony is once upon a time. I prefer this is no chit over not wasting my time with fairy tales.
His answer reveals a narrative (blame only Crooks) driven bias.
Fact: The investigation has not concluded.
Fact: Bullet trajectory analysis has not concluded.
Fact: There is no proof that Crooks fired the shot that hit Trump.
His statement cannot be taken as factually conclusive.
Amen my dear sister the same read I had.
Exactly!
Honestly, I don't want ANY FUCKING FBI FAGGOTS near DJT. EVER!
Amen
That being said....
I am beginning to feel like the hearings are doing their best to sell J13 as a lone gunman event...
So there maybe as many as 3/4 guns being involved as shown by audio evidence...
Blood from a unknown was located inside the building Crook's was on top off.
A van seen under the water tower in earlier in the day on video was found ditched ten miles away filled with explosives, we are told. The detonator was found next to Crooks.
The van is registered to a arms company owned by a family whos name is Yerick (spelled wrong perhaps) and /pol/ 4chan was telling folks to be on the look out for Micheal/Maxwell who hasn't been seen since J13 either.
Speculation...second shooter in the window was also clipped enough to bleed but exited the area in the dumped van.
In any case...holes must be punched in the lone gunman theory in real time. Or they will claim all this was about one sad man acting alone.
Absolutely... driving their narrative..
Could you tell me more about the blood IN THE BUILDING? Haven't heard this...
Read through the text messages here:
https://greatawakening.win/p/17txMULVSw/second-shooter-comms-caught-on-t/
Thanks for the assist.
YW fren!
Thank you yldngo!
yldngo was first with the source.
Your not the first to appear and then try to give me a multi paragraph response pushing back on the lone gunman theory and your almost completely certain that more proof in necessary at this point?...as for that Van you will find it on Video under the water tower a couple hours prior. As for who shot who that Cullen guy stated earlier today that auto evidence supports that idea there were more shots taken with a suppressed gun and there is Video showing a muzzle flash from the second window. I think evidence of more then one shooter totally destroys the lone gunman theory.
Time will tell who's right of that I am certain.
The Odysee stream I was viewing with Mr Cullen has been taken down and his info about the second shooter is now pay walled but here is the link anyway...
https://odysee.com/@Crowdsourcethetruth:d/JohnCullenInvestigatesShooterintheWindow:c
And here he is talking about the ideas with someone else.
https://odysee.com/@iamjohncullen:4/john-cullen-investigates-is-that-someone:0
But for me gunman was not alone in his endeavors is very apparent to me and others as well...
If it is a lone gun man then everyone's off the hook? Right? Just chalk it up to 30-40 LEO's all just having a bad day all at the same time. And they will just try to make sure it never happens again?
We will see...
The best evidence of more than one shooter is the audio signature that is consistent across multiple different recordings from multiple different locations.
First there were three muffled shots fired from Gun A and Location A, followed by about five unmuffled shots fired in a burst from Gun B at Location B, then a third gunshot fired from Gun C and Location C.
After that about ten seconds go by, and then there is a fourth shot, which appears to be the sniper counter-shot that killed Crooks.
The difference between Gun A and Gun B is very distinct (muffled/unmuffled, different pitch) and the different timing in the echo suggests different locations.
The first three muffled shots all appear to have been at Trump, and the second burst appear to have been more in his general direction, hitting the crowd.
The body on the roof (probably Crooks) only had one gun beside it so it doesn’t seem likely that he could have fired two different guns.
I know they say there were eight shell casings near Crooks, but I believe that is a lie. First because Cheatle refused to commit to an initial number, and second because when they did first answer, they used vague language: the area, the vicinity.
Wray during questioning, approximately 10 days into the investigation was asked if shooters rifle had a scope,Wray said he didn't know? If that doesn't blow your mind, this will, the senator who asked the question, just moved on to the next question, as in his mind that was a perfectly understandable response as far as he was concerned. I have no words, maybe you do.
Lol, everyone on the planet saw the picture/video of crooks aiming his rifle w/ out a scope. Wray is destroying the FBI as instructed by the white hats
This script would awaken a blind man!
That would make sense(they are being exposed)but still if that is all that happens (exposer) this is beyond troubling.
Where is the photo?
So, no shrapnel then, okay.
nor glass from a shattered teleprompter.
That was bullshit from the get-go. That came out from one of the lib networks, on the day of, yet, in the pictures where the SS was surrounding Trump, trying to get him off the stage, everyone could see that both teleprompters were in tact - not a scratch on either one.
The media tells us that we CANNOT believe what we see with our own eyes. Only believe whatever they tell us. They are the ONLY arbiters of truth.
https://twstalker.com/PapiTrumpo/status/1818341135338651988
Doesn't NSA "have it all?" All communications among all involved for the last few months+? I feel like this dog and pony show could be shut down so quickly if JUST ONE government agency did what they're supposed to fucking do.
Boom you say?
https://qalerts.app/?q=boom
Boom indeed ss! Well played...👏🫡
This is their Warren Commission and we don’t believe this either
I like Kennedy, he's goofy.
He's keklarious!