Which makes me REALLY wonder: If a real sniper shot at Trump, and not the kid, how did he miss? I think any halfway decent sniper would literally hit Trump's skull 100 out of 100 times.
Easy to explain. There are a lot of factors that can effect the accuracy of a shot, and almost all of then are amplified as distances are increased. These include everything from the internal balance of the bullet to whether the wind speed changes while the bullet is in flight. Most of the analysis I've seen showed the shot being on target save for Trump moving his head. If that shot came from the water tower, then the timing could be correct.
I hate these videos with the shitty overly loud music. And yeah, nah didn't see him die. Myabe if you squint your eyes looking through a plastic bottle sure, I can make out something ...
Yup. Hard to take it seriously when they throw in the stupid music and the clip is filmed with a potato-cam. I didn't see anyone die either here. Could be, but it could also be a whole lot of other things.
This guy has been pushing junk for two weeks now. So which audible report is assigned to this “kill” shot. If it was audible, it was captured and wouldn’t it have caused the crowd to respond in some noticeable fashion? Otherwise we have to assume it was suppressed? Correct?
I see that he dissapears for a split second but the figure keeps moving to the right right after the part he keeps replaying. So either it was a super dramatic stumble and fall or this is before shots were fired
That's his point, this happened before shots were fired ... Which means that someone else fired the shot that hit Trump's ear, and he believes that was the uniformed USSS sniper in the American Glass building ( "Agent Sketchy" )
Im missing the part where anything in this video shows the shooter being taken out. The flicker is not the person falling because you can see them walk to the right literally right after it disappears for that brief second. Do dead people walk?
The shooter being taken out in that video, should be regarded as a hypothesis at this time, not as proven fact.
His hypothesis is based on a few frames with grainy pixels, where you can see a form moving and suddenly collapsing.
For example he also claims that the following frame shows the bullet exiting the neck of the gunman: https://nitter.poast.org/pic/orig/media%2FGT3LUpvWgAAy8pv.jpg
Btw, I could not see anyone walking to the right, could you provide a pic?
Btw, I could not see anyone walking to the right, could you provide a pic?
I mean just rewatch the video, the red circle follows the person. Right after the figure flickers it reappears and keeps moving. Its just poor camera quality. To say this is the shooter being taken out is to ignore the fact that the person keeps walking. What im more interested in is seeing a video of the shooter actually walking on the roof. Every other video shows him crawling or laying down
i can see what you mean now, at the end of the full clip you can see the form move to the right a bit, but then the form becomes "misty" and the clip ends right there...
From pictures and others, he was shot in the upper left side of his head, exit wound was lower right side, like his neck area. This video has him going lower left and kinda goes back up. If you get shot from the left, especially the head area, you don’t “kinda bounce back up” and in the same direction you were shot at. Or at least nothing I’ve ever seen. Remember “back and to the left, Back and to the left.” Except this would’ve been back and to the right. So I’m gonna so nope. Not sure why he’s a bobble head, but getting shot that hard, that’s a insta drop. These videos…thought we lived in a modern era. Everything is blurry and sloppy. Bigfoot all over again.
LoL, yeah exactly. We’ve got better footage of JFK, than tens of thousands of cameras at this event. And at least, in that angle where the shooter is visible, should’ve been at least 100-300 cameras. We get one? And where video enhancements. This isn’t the 60’s. If I had footage I’d be going to wherever I had to go to get this enhanced and then put my hand out to whichever media wants to pay more. With a release date shortly thereafter placed in the hands of 50+ people. Easy day one stuff. Where is all the footage?
One thing I did notice that plays into this, the blood on the roof-man's face was very much DRIED blood. Which suggests a certain amount of time passes before the photo is taken. Standard timeline would be much shorter than this and blood needs time to dry. That could be tested for, how long until a blood trail dries and cracks in the weather conditions there? what would be the interval in standard timeline vs this one that is longer?
I don’t see anyone dying, I see him stepping to his left after a compression artifact, why does the video stop there? Also, no shots were heard at that time. This is controlled disinformation.
Exactly that, we need the entire footage of mr. Copenhaver's video, both before and after this clip.
Maybe this is indeed a controlled disinformation campaign to explain how the body got there ( MSM says it is Crook's body, i think it is Yearick's body ).
An maybe it's not. We just don't have enough facts yet at this time.
No. I understand why you would say that, but what you are seeing him ducking, and the framerate, and video compression of his like 2 pixels. Else you would have to explain how he was shot with a silent bullet.
This is dumb. To think they killed the dumbass kid who was clearly and thankfully a horrible shot before an SS sniper took his shot at Trump is ridiculous. SS sniper with top of the line optics, ammo and barrel isn't missing a 150yd shot or even 300 plus. They warm up at these distances before taking on long distance targets at the range. I can hit 2in groups with with my AR at 150yds and that's without a custom barrel and with store bought ammo. Even a 300 blackout suppressed with sub sonic ammo is deadly accurate at 150yds.
There's no proof he was shot in that clip. I'm starting to believe more and more that John Cullen is just a grifter. He changes his narrative constantly.
John Cullen is a paYtriot. There are videos of the witnesses testifying to seeing his head getting blown out after hearing the shots fired. This is nonsense based on potato camera filming. Stop giving this guy any respect.
This was a JFK like assassination attempt by our own gov’t.
Which makes me REALLY wonder: If a real sniper shot at Trump, and not the kid, how did he miss? I think any halfway decent sniper would literally hit Trump's skull 100 out of 100 times.
Easy to explain. There are a lot of factors that can effect the accuracy of a shot, and almost all of then are amplified as distances are increased. These include everything from the internal balance of the bullet to whether the wind speed changes while the bullet is in flight. Most of the analysis I've seen showed the shot being on target save for Trump moving his head. If that shot came from the water tower, then the timing could be correct.
Occam’s razor unless the eventual Declas we are all expecting reveals the truth be something else.
I hate these videos with the shitty overly loud music. And yeah, nah didn't see him die. Myabe if you squint your eyes looking through a plastic bottle sure, I can make out something ...
Yup. Hard to take it seriously when they throw in the stupid music and the clip is filmed with a potato-cam. I didn't see anyone die either here. Could be, but it could also be a whole lot of other things.
This guy has been pushing junk for two weeks now. So which audible report is assigned to this “kill” shot. If it was audible, it was captured and wouldn’t it have caused the crowd to respond in some noticeable fashion? Otherwise we have to assume it was suppressed? Correct?
Correct, this is also assumed by https://nitter.poast.org/JG_CSTT/status/1818900763298427214 ( by subsonic ammo )
Link fails in both DDG and Safari
try https://x.com/JG_CSTT/status/1818900763298427214
I see that he dissapears for a split second but the figure keeps moving to the right right after the part he keeps replaying. So either it was a super dramatic stumble and fall or this is before shots were fired
That's his point, this happened before shots were fired ... Which means that someone else fired the shot that hit Trump's ear, and he believes that was the uniformed USSS sniper in the American Glass building ( "Agent Sketchy" )
Im missing the part where anything in this video shows the shooter being taken out. The flicker is not the person falling because you can see them walk to the right literally right after it disappears for that brief second. Do dead people walk?
The shooter being taken out in that video, should be regarded as a hypothesis at this time, not as proven fact. His hypothesis is based on a few frames with grainy pixels, where you can see a form moving and suddenly collapsing. For example he also claims that the following frame shows the bullet exiting the neck of the gunman: https://nitter.poast.org/pic/orig/media%2FGT3LUpvWgAAy8pv.jpg
Btw, I could not see anyone walking to the right, could you provide a pic?
I mean just rewatch the video, the red circle follows the person. Right after the figure flickers it reappears and keeps moving. Its just poor camera quality. To say this is the shooter being taken out is to ignore the fact that the person keeps walking. What im more interested in is seeing a video of the shooter actually walking on the roof. Every other video shows him crawling or laying down
There appears to be “spray” right before the person appears to roll over and flail an arm. However…,
i can see what you mean now, at the end of the full clip you can see the form move to the right a bit, but then the form becomes "misty" and the clip ends right there...
Anyone seen Greg?
From pictures and others, he was shot in the upper left side of his head, exit wound was lower right side, like his neck area. This video has him going lower left and kinda goes back up. If you get shot from the left, especially the head area, you don’t “kinda bounce back up” and in the same direction you were shot at. Or at least nothing I’ve ever seen. Remember “back and to the left, Back and to the left.” Except this would’ve been back and to the right. So I’m gonna so nope. Not sure why he’s a bobble head, but getting shot that hard, that’s a insta drop. These videos…thought we lived in a modern era. Everything is blurry and sloppy. Bigfoot all over again.
Why do you hate the Lochness Monster?
LoL, yeah exactly. We’ve got better footage of JFK, than tens of thousands of cameras at this event. And at least, in that angle where the shooter is visible, should’ve been at least 100-300 cameras. We get one? And where video enhancements. This isn’t the 60’s. If I had footage I’d be going to wherever I had to go to get this enhanced and then put my hand out to whichever media wants to pay more. With a release date shortly thereafter placed in the hands of 50+ people. Easy day one stuff. Where is all the footage?
One thing I did notice that plays into this, the blood on the roof-man's face was very much DRIED blood. Which suggests a certain amount of time passes before the photo is taken. Standard timeline would be much shorter than this and blood needs time to dry. That could be tested for, how long until a blood trail dries and cracks in the weather conditions there? what would be the interval in standard timeline vs this one that is longer?
I pointed out the dried blood too when I first saw the pic. Not just dried but cracked like it had been baking for a while IMO.
Also, looked like he was shot from the side, not front.
I don’t see anyone dying, I see him stepping to his left after a compression artifact, why does the video stop there? Also, no shots were heard at that time. This is controlled disinformation.
Exactly that, we need the entire footage of mr. Copenhaver's video, both before and after this clip.
Maybe this is indeed a controlled disinformation campaign to explain how the body got there ( MSM says it is Crook's body, i think it is Yearick's body ). An maybe it's not. We just don't have enough facts yet at this time.
Sorry but John probably should calm down.
No. I understand why you would say that, but what you are seeing him ducking, and the framerate, and video compression of his like 2 pixels. Else you would have to explain how he was shot with a silent bullet.
This is dumb. To think they killed the dumbass kid who was clearly and thankfully a horrible shot before an SS sniper took his shot at Trump is ridiculous. SS sniper with top of the line optics, ammo and barrel isn't missing a 150yd shot or even 300 plus. They warm up at these distances before taking on long distance targets at the range. I can hit 2in groups with with my AR at 150yds and that's without a custom barrel and with store bought ammo. Even a 300 blackout suppressed with sub sonic ammo is deadly accurate at 150yds.
There's no proof he was shot in that clip. I'm starting to believe more and more that John Cullen is just a grifter. He changes his narrative constantly.
John Cullen is a paYtriot. There are videos of the witnesses testifying to seeing his head getting blown out after hearing the shots fired. This is nonsense based on potato camera filming. Stop giving this guy any respect.
I saw a resolution-pixel artifact.
Nitter Link: https://nitter.poast.org/I_Am_JohnCullen/status/1818800870576034286
Larger Size MP4 : https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1818800304227254274/pu/vid/avc1/1280x720/7wM4eaA2Elmb93LL.mp4
Really looks like he walks away after getting his head blown open and then the vid cuts