https://brentcates.substack.com/p/donald-trump-is-in-a-death-dance
The Vile Legacy and Social Media Corporations can try to erase LIVING MEMORY of what we all witnessed in the mediums they control and It simply won’t matter.
A month out from this earthshaking event I have had time to process and reflect on what I witnessed.
While at the same time Google, Facebook and the FBI were working nonstop to minimize, dismiss and obfuscate the events of that day, to then move on as if July 13th never happened.
BECAUSE THEY MISSED. (what do I mean by THEY? WHO do I mean? Read on)
Every America First and MAGA Supporter recognized what this was as all of Globalist Media converged to bury an event that didn’t work out as they’d planned.
It's Brent, his brother, not Brian.
Yikes! Sorry for the error, and thanks for pointing it out.
God has other plans.
He never says who the three people are does he?
I am not a subscriber, so I don't know what else he said after the intro. If anyone wants to copy and paste the rest of his article here for the rest of us to read, that would be great.
It's like the Cates' brothers are 24 months behind the curve.
Maybe. On the other hand, they do their research and they produce some of the best red-pill material for normies I've seen. And although I've been red-pilled for decades I enjoy reading their columns, and do sometimes find something new (to me) in what they write.
I've enjoyed watching them awaken.
Yeah. They WERE late to the party.
Indeed.
...S.E.S
Instead it was BOOM, Trump not dead, shooter dead, case closed.
https://kambala.nsw.edu.au/
False dichotomy.
Q is real, AND shit happens anyway because "white hats are in control" doesn't (and CAN'T) mean that they control every damn thing everywhere.
EDIT: I'm not saying you're wrong about the attempt "being a movie" controlled by the white hats, although given that three people in addition to Trump were shot and one died while the other two received serious wounds, I find it very difficult to believe the good guys ran this particular op.
Could be, but for several reasons I doubt it.
I am closer to this idea than any others. In control, means they KNOW what the eventual outcome is because NOTHING CAN STOP WHAT IS COMING.
OK … Nice bumper sticker/hashtag right? Maybe so, but the derps hate this man and his family like nothing before. They dont give a fuck. They want him dead. They control the 3 letters, they are protected. Civil war? Thats their wet dream … Gun Grab 101.
No no … I 100% think they 100% know HE will be around for something later. How? PROJECT LOOKING-GLASS.
Yep … that is some multi-layered, heavy duty tin-foil hat shit, I know. However, Occums Razor absolutely applies
Again, a false dichotomy.
God might be the reason the bullet missed, but simple chance plays a large and constant role in life. We got lucky (well, aside from the victims). God may or may not have had anything to do with it. I'm a cantankerous sort who believes God doesn't intervene, but I don't see any way to prove the issue one way or another.
Don't forget what happened to King Ahab how a random arrow hit a chink in his armour while pretending to be a regular soldier in a battle. I have to ask why wouldn't God, or an Angel under His direction do anything, especially something this close? Hebrews 1:14.
Good point. I've always looked at the millions of innocents over the years and centuries, Christians and otherwise, who beseeched God to save them from one horror or another, and died anyway. For that matter, we've all known good and decent people, including loved ones in some cases, who died or were horribly harmed but "could have been saved" if only God intervened. There's WAY too much of that for me to believe that God is both loving AND personally involved in everything that happens here on Earth. One or the other, perhaps, but not both.
Not a popular viewpoint here, but it's not something I can't shake.
I just accidentally refreshed the page after typing basically a book to you. using about 15 verses. Maybe that's my cue to keep it short. Haha. Okay if you would like the long form version I'm very happy to do it again but the point I was trying to make to you is in this one verse in Psalms.
Psalm 116:15 "Precious in the sight of the Lord is the death of His saints"
Scriptures do address this topic very adequately in my opinion and I will post a couple here below:
Luke 13:1-3 Jesus spoke about innocents dying and asked if the crowd of people thought maybe they were worse sinners than anyone else because for instance and tower fell on some in Jerusalem Jesus says no, but unless you repent you will all likewise perish (speaking here...eternally)
Eccl 8:12-13 Solomon says, "Though a sinner does evil a hundred times, and his days are prolonged, yet I surely know that it will be will with those who fear God, who fear before Him. But it will not be well with the wicked; nor will he prolong his days which are as a shadow because he does not fear before God."
Eccl 7:15 Solomon also says, "I have seen everything in my days of vanity: There is a just man who perishes in his righteousness and there is a wicked man who prolongs life in his wickedness"
So what's Solomon saying here? Two things I think, number 1 He's saying that life happens to us all he also says that we don't know our time and one day we're here and another we're dead like a fish caught in a net or a bird in a snare Eccl 9:11-12. But what he's also saying regarding the sinner is that when evil people get to heaven, not one of them will have a chance to tell God, "you didn't give me a chance." By the time you shoot the home invader or the thief is killed on the motorcycle after running a red light, God has given them more than one opportunity to turn to Him. This is why Solomon says he knows "it will not be well with the wicked." because he will not be given life after this but death.
Eccl 11:13 - "Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God and keep His commandments, for this is mans all, for God will bring every work into judgment, including every secret thing, whether good or evil."
I would love to talk about this more if you would like please ask more questions but I also don't want to bore you or give you unnecessary information which you already grasp. I will end it with Solomon's last words at the end of the book of Ecclesiastes which really is a start to finish journal of the meaning of life for a the wisest man on Earth until Jesus who was king over arguably the greatest kingdom man has ever known.
--Side bar: As Christians we don't have the judgement day to fear, in fact it will be the first time in our life that all our guilt will be separated from us and we will stand justified not only before ourselves but before God the Father, The Son, and the Holy Spirit. Romans 6:4 Therefore we were buried with Him through baptism into death, that just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life. For if we have been united together in the likeness of His death, certainly we also shall be in the likeness of His resurrection.
You hypothesize that I'm presenting a false dichotomy.
I hypothesize that I'm not.
The information necessary to distinguish who is correct or incorrect will never be public, so you have no more standing to claim it's a false dichotomy than I have to insist that it is a proper dichotomy.
But I'm not insisting. I'm merely presenting a hypothesis.
That's the way it is with everything that is Q-related. Nothing is provable. No one gets to insist any fact as indisputable. It's 100% about Socratic method, educated guesses and hypothesis.
The Socratic method in this particular instance ...
Does Q understand it is up against a centuries-entrenched cabal? Yes.
Does Q understand it is up against a cabal with trillions of dollars at its disposal? Yes.
Does Q understand that MK Ultra is a thing? Yes.
Does Q understand that assassination attempts against Trump would be inevitable? Yes.
Does Q understand the sheer magnitude of resources at the cabal's disposal virtually guarantee that Trump would be assassinated if his security wasn't overseen by military intelligence at all times? Yes.
With all that is at stake, would Q trust Trump's safety strictly to a hostile Biden administration? No.
Taking everything above into consideration, would Q allow the scenario unfold as we were explained? The one where
The answer to that is "No".
It's not even about whether they can "control every damn thing everywhere". It's about the sheer magnitude of the lapse in security that was reported. The lapse as reported could not exist if Q is real.
My hypothesis is that Trump and Q have already won the battle before it started by nailing the top of the cabal from the beginning, hijacking their chain of command, taking control of their operations and working out how the tens of thousands of cabal middlemen operatives will be punished while commanding them to self-immolate.
It is impossible to claim this hypothesis is false with publicly available knowledge. It's also impossible to insist that it's true. I'm not trying to insist that its true, I'm presenting it as a plausible hypothesis of the situation, and with all the data I see available I consider it to be the most plausible scenario.
I agree with most of your points.
I keep getting stuck on the (seeming) fact that actual bullets were flying around and that four people were shot: Trump and three in the audience, one of whom died. Again, hard for me to believe that was part of The Plan by our guys.
I also don't believe that even having Trump's security being overseen by military intelligence would make Trump 100% safe from assassins. I don't believe ANYTHING can make someone 100% safe from assassins, anymore than I believe traffic fatalities or other types of tragedy can be 100% avoided. Put simply (and crudely): Shit happens. You can't predict or prevent everything. This is war, and war NEVER goes as planned.
My belief is that somehow or other, security at Trump's public events had been eroded despite White Hat efforts.
That's scary because it suggests other important elements (the military generally, for instance) are in FACT compromised to the extent they visibly seem to be, instead of being mostly intact except for outward-facing masks of incompetence and Wokeness.
I could be wrong and of course hope to Hell that I am.
Imagine for a moment the following hypothetical:
In a hypothetical with the above assumptions, I see no moral dilemma.
The above hypotheticals are the only way I would believe it is a psyop. I don't think Q or Trump would develop a plan knowing individuals were going to die.
It's difficult to believe either way ... hard to believe it is a psyop, and hard to believe Q was completely incompetent that day.
I don't either. No harm, no foul.
But with all the close-in and many thousands of further-out real-time witnesses, I don't believe the scenario is credible.
Perhaps Q will let us in on the details at some point. I doubt it, but there's a lot I'd love to know about MANY situations and events that Q might choose to share with us later, and I hope that happens, at least for some things.
The WH managed to track all the bad actors making trading shorts before the shooting, along with media and other people trying to capture it live instead of delayed.
The security was abysmal. It twas only luck that Trump is still alive.
Q is not God and the White Hats can't stop everything. This is war and the enemy has a vote.
Logic driven by binary is the correct path.
Yet I think your binary needs adjustment. And to be less compounded for each binary. But soldier on. The truth is always the best path to find.