The Reich Effect
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (61)
sorted by:
I prefer the term- big dick energy.
Kek
But there are, in fact, plenty of females who think for themselves. A smaller percentage, perhaps, but still -- I know a number of them. None have dicks, thank goodness.
Independent thinking is independent of all external categories.
This is why independent thinkers are the most soulful individuals you will ever meet.
here's one
As a woman, I always felt different and never understood why others group think or follow blindly. Thank God for blessing me with critical thinking!
My wife's the same way.
The fact that there are exceptions to the rule does not disprove the rule.
In general, the concept described in the OP above is correct. 80+ percent of all humans behave like sheep. Their only concern is to fit in with the herd they belong to. This has been verified by the results of research conducted over many decades.
The OP explains the main reason why this is true. It is a safety mechanism (safety of the herd). Fitting in and going along with the herd is much safer than being independent, self-reliant and self-sufficient ... women and weak men (who behave like women) are the most susceptible to this way of thinking by far.
The weak are always looking for someone or something to take care of them. Many, especially women, view the government as a type of surrogate parents that will protect and care for them (which in the past was the responsibility of the husband).
This explains the globalist attacks on "toxic masculinity", etc. The evil scumbags want all people to behave like women, because women are weak and can be easily controlled via their emotions, etc.
I'm not arguing with that.
Sexist alert!!
They have to come up with a similar female term that they like. That's not my job.....
Lol big chesticle energy doesn't quite have the same ring to it 😆
Kek Kek
It's true... and mostly due to soy in EVERYTHING. EVERYWHERE.
Want to explain exactly why flavored fucking soybean oil is refrigerated next to the half and half?
So true — I refuse to eat “chicken “ without a bone in it for species identification 😆 I used to mess with people years ago when “chicken nuggets “ became popular— saying how can you be sure what it is without bones— soybeans aren’t mammals as I recall- nor are almonds— wtf people— will these people just eat and drink anything 🤣😁
When Clinton gave Monsanto the go-ahead to use bovine growth hormones which led to the necessity of the overuse of antibiotics, it led me to become lactose intolerant. Just having some ice cream would turn my asshole into a garden hose and I'd be bedridden for days with intense cramping in my bowels. Back in the '90s as an ignorant college student, I figured that I just had to live with it. Rice milk was too watery, but soy milk seemed better (only because it's loaded with sugar to try to make the nasty crap taste alright). I was a soyboy for several years, not knowing what it was doing to me. I was experiencing low-T levels and low bone density. The internet was still in its infancy at that time, and doctors don't know shit about crap. Then I started to learn about soy, fluoride and such. I began eating organic yogurt to rebuild the bacteria I had lost in my gut from all the antibiotics. Now I can drink milk constantly and I'm fine.
So lactose intolerance can be one reason, but almond milk is by far better than soy milk. In this age, there is no excuse to be drinking soy milk. Only vegans and pussies should drink that crap. Really though, nobody should drink soy milk. It's bad news.
If you can't identify chicken meat by taste and texture without a bone in it that's a skill issue on your part.
I know— I just liked messing with people about it - btw I was a taxidermist for years in the 70’s — carcasses and hides were my business
I was thinking it was related to Clintoon troll Robert Reich.
FOUR FOOT TWO HAS ENTERED THE CHAT
Edward Bernays has entered the chat
This reminds me of their agenda to make everyone think they are only valuable looking a certain way. Even as a free thinker I feel my young mind was molded to think my value is solely in my looks. I realize the propaganda needs to be unlearned in that aspect.
My wife often says women shouldn’t vote because they act too readily on emotion.
Well she’s not wrong. Women are way too emotional and act on those emotions.
It’s not an attempt at division or denying anyone rights. It’s a valid conclusion based on a long history of observation, including many women themselves admitting as much, including my wife.
Did I say that? I said women act on their emotions too much.
Yep, that would be illogical and insane.
Well most level-headed women would disagree with her. Agreed, let’s stop the division. There are plenty of women that can handle their emotions better than men at times.
Which is why they keep trying to program men to "be in touch with their feelings" they want us to be emotional as women so they can use the same manipulation methods on us.
Men are already pretty in tune with their emotions. They always have been. The difference was always that men could set aside their emotions to get the job done, e.g. be professional when needed or otherwise focus on the task at hand.
The problem isn't men becoming "more in touch with their feelings", but rather that they have programmed men to crave and seek attention for making them the focus, which is where human conformity starts to come into play.
Men have plenty of emotions they act on as well.
Maybe she does, but not all women do.
The use of "aneurotypical" said enough to me.
This "neurodivergent" shit is so stupid.
Half of the The audience , raised on the personality type, is dividing itself into infinite labels. as the more natural half recognizes itself in each of the 16 and reunites with itself for the next act. Theres dense smoke mixed with fog and a beacon flashing the way
This whole thing stinks.to me. A republic of high status males is best for decision making. Why then do we have so many fantastic success stories of women and low class men in America, rising from nowhere to become titans of industry, military heroes, top doctors, the list goes on and on. Are we not witnessing a lot of wicked plans come to fruition because these special males are thinkng freely? Only when held to the chains of the Constitution are these "free thinkers" held in check to only pass laws that benefit the people. Lastly, this clown starts the whole diatribe by making a distinction or caste separation of those who are not their idea of perfection. God makes no mistakes...we are all here for a reason. Peace and harmony is a much smoother road.
"Do not think that I came to bring peace to the earth; I came not to bring peace, but a sword."
We're living in a time that truth is being assaulted on all sides. We need to be forthright in our disdain for the degeneracy that's being promoted as the new normal. Diversity is not a strength. Men and women are not equal. Porn is not healthy or normal. Endless foreign warring is not defence.
I believe every word that man just said, because it's exactly what i wanted to hear
lol, EXACTLY.
Careful, youre becoming the division you hoped not to spread
BS. There are plenty of free thinking women out there. Especially on GAW. Don’t group them with low T males bc some gals I know on here can handle a gun to defend themselves better than any globohomo.
I agree completely. These Feds on here need to stop trying to divide.
married women are more likely to be right wing(as they follow their husband's opinions). Single women are more likely to be left wing(as they follow the public or government's opinion)
Hmm, is it possible that strong right wing women think for themselves & tend to find strong right wing men with big balls to marry? Or do you truly think that most women, regardless of how they lean politically, are idiot followers?
MOST women follow the strongest presence in their life. If its not the husband than it would be the society around them. That is the nature of women regardless if you want to accept that or not. And yes , women are followers by nature
Wrong. I know plenty of women who do their own research, form their own opinions, ask their own questions and make their own judgments. You must not know many women because MOST are not how you describe. Many of them are also incredible leaders, wives and mothers. Your poor, skewed, insecure opinion of women doesn’t create any real facts or tendencies, bud.
For only those who are free to think? Think about that for a minuite....
My thoughts exactly.
As a woman, I must be aneurotypical or maybe the "is this true" comes from being raised by a conspiracy theorist. Dad is 86 yrs old and he still questions everything.
You probably have bigger intellectual balls than the joker who wrote this post.
Big Autisdick energy.
The filter of “is this true” vs “Will others be ok with my thinking this” clarifies how & why we still have so many people asleep. Critical thinking isn’t in their discernment process.
This post is complete bs. Gun-toting women have every power they need to defend themselves, think freely, toss the screens and kick some ass, lol.