Me neither but it's the most effective communication style. Less is more. Sometimes the more you say, the more it may look like you're trying to complicate things, talk over people's heads, obfuscate, or bloviate for the sake of arrogance and ego. Guilty on all counts, I routinely go back and chop out 2/3 of what I write. :)
It depends on examples. what do you do if you are multiethnic? Should someone half black and half white only marry black? etc
The big problem is a lot of people default to one drop rule. So half black kids ignore their white heritage. Hispanics are all part white, some even purely white, and they tend to disregard their heritage too even though european culture is responsible for most everything Latin Americans hold dear (catholicism, the food, soccer, art, music, etc)
Note that I said “inclined”, and not “exclusively”.
The foundations for my statements were both biblical (as best as I understand the verses), and observed practical experience.
Frankly, I didn’t even like the wording though, so between the downvote and this response, which is nowhere near what I was trying to get at, I’ll just denounce my comment, but it was intended to be helpful.
Human nature drives us to compete with one another, which is why
collectivism will never succeed.
You may be white, but other white people are also competing with you for resources.
In a world where competition is natural, people prioritize their own family and personal interests first.
The truth is, a random stranger who shares your ethnicity isn’t going to care about you. They don’t know you.
So what does this mean?
They’ll always look out for their own family and themselves before anyone else. When it’s a choice between you, a stranger, and their family, they’ll throw you under the bus.
Take Gavin Newsom as an example—why is he harming California? He’s a white man, yet where is his ethnic loyalty?
It doesn’t exist! He cares only about his family and himself.
The Bible teaches us about Judas, right? What did someone from Jesus’ own tribe do? He betrayed Jesus for money.
This story is significant.
Because of the competitive nature of resources, many people from your ethnic group wouldn’t hesitate to betray you if it served their interests.
So, for those who think ethnic heritage is what matters most, they’re missing the point.
In a world driven by competition, ethnic loyalty holds little weight.
As long as your world view is directed by a "scarcity of resources" you will only see and experience a scarcity in life.
The moment you choose to see Abundance in all you do will be the moment Abundance enters your life.
I highly recommend "Think and Grow Rich" by Napolean Hill for anyone feeling scarcity in life.
"Rich" isn't just about money. We can have richness in our relationships, richness in our experiences, and richness in our accomplishments. We can have richness in all we do.
This book will change the life for those open minded to learn its secrets. One must have a Desire to learn and put into practice it's secrets, but people of ALL ethnicities, backgrounds, and circumstances have used its secrets for massive success.
Some will make excuses and have "reasons" it won't work form them.
But as a mentor said to me just yesterday.
You can have excuses or results, but you can't have both.
So I understand where you're coming from with the idea of a mindset of abundance versus scarcity, and I agree that our mindset can significantly impact how we approach challenges in life. Books like Think and Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill have inspired many people to adopt a more positive outlook and to take actionable steps toward their goals, which is undeniably valuable.
That said, it's important to recognize that while mindset plays a crucial role, it's not the only factor in achieving success. External realities, access to resources, and economic conditions, also influence outcomes. It’s not always as simple as changing one's mindset and manifesting abundance. Many people face significant obstacles—whether they be social, economic, or environmental—that require more than just positive thinking to overcome.
I think there’s value in balancing both perspectives. Yes, adopting an abundance mindset can lead to personal growth and open doors to new opportunities. But it’s also essential to acknowledge that people come from different circumstances, and those challenges can’t always be dismissed with mindset alone. It’s a matter of both: empowering individuals to think abundantly while also addressing the real-world barriers that might limit their opportunities.
As for the idea that you can’t have both excuses and results—I get the sentiment behind it. However, sometimes what looks like an excuse may be a legitimate barrier that someone needs help navigating. The key is figuring out how to overcome those barriers while staying open to the possibilities of growth and abundance.
Ultimately, it’s about finding that middle ground where mindset and reality meet, and using both to make meaningful progress.
Gavin Newsom is a tribalist of the NWO. The NWO wants complete domination of the world. Those within the NWO have given up their ethnic tribalism to NWO tribalism. A world driven by competition is a world of the NWO. Think outside the NWO box.
I get what you're saying about the NWO and the idea of domination, but competition isn't solely an invention of the NWO.
It's a natural outcome of the physical world we live in.
Our 3D existence, constrained by time and space, makes competition inevitable.
There are limited resources, and that scarcity pushes individuals and groups to compete—whether for food, land, or opportunities.
Even if the NWO exists and promotes a specific agenda, competition itself isn't something you can just "think outside of."
It's a fundamental aspect of life because of the finite nature of our world.
Sure, we can reduce destructive competition by promoting cooperation and fairness, but we can't escape the basic reality that limited resources drive competition.
In a hypothetical world where we existed outside of space and time, maybe competition wouldn't be necessary. But in the real world we inhabit, competition has always been present, long before any modern power structures like the NWO.
So, it's less about thinking "outside the NWO box" and more about understanding how competition naturally arises from the constraints we live under, and then figuring out how to balance it with collaboration and shared goals for a better society.
If you want a simple example of natural competition, just look at an expressway.
As more people get on the road, the available space becomes limited.
Since there’s only so much physical room in each lane, drivers naturally begin competing for space.
This leads to frustration and tension, which is why road rage can happen.
This is a perfect example of how natural competition arises in our 3D world.
The scarcity of physical space on the road creates competition, and it’s not something orchestrated—it happens organically due to the limitations of our environment.
That is a very superficial take, and one that many people have been propagandized to accept.
Ethnicity and family/self is one and the same.
Not caring about your roots is not caring about yourself.
Caring more about camping and boating is a shallow life.
I need to be less verbose like this guy, nail meet head. Said it better in less than what I did myself.
"Less verbose" is not usually how I am described.
LOL.
Take the compliment and run then! Lol
Take it as taciturn for the best!
Me neither but it's the most effective communication style. Less is more. Sometimes the more you say, the more it may look like you're trying to complicate things, talk over people's heads, obfuscate, or bloviate for the sake of arrogance and ego. Guilty on all counts, I routinely go back and chop out 2/3 of what I write. :)
It depends on examples. what do you do if you are multiethnic? Should someone half black and half white only marry black? etc
The big problem is a lot of people default to one drop rule. So half black kids ignore their white heritage. Hispanics are all part white, some even purely white, and they tend to disregard their heritage too even though european culture is responsible for most everything Latin Americans hold dear (catholicism, the food, soccer, art, music, etc)
Note that I said “inclined”, and not “exclusively”.
The foundations for my statements were both biblical (as best as I understand the verses), and observed practical experience.
Frankly, I didn’t even like the wording though, so between the downvote and this response, which is nowhere near what I was trying to get at, I’ll just denounce my comment, but it was intended to be helpful.
No, it’s not.
Human nature drives us to compete with one another, which is why collectivism will never succeed.
You may be white, but other white people are also competing with you for resources.
In a world where competition is natural, people prioritize their own family and personal interests first.
The truth is, a random stranger who shares your ethnicity isn’t going to care about you. They don’t know you.
So what does this mean?
They’ll always look out for their own family and themselves before anyone else. When it’s a choice between you, a stranger, and their family, they’ll throw you under the bus.
Take Gavin Newsom as an example—why is he harming California? He’s a white man, yet where is his ethnic loyalty?
It doesn’t exist! He cares only about his family and himself.
The Bible teaches us about Judas, right? What did someone from Jesus’ own tribe do? He betrayed Jesus for money.
This story is significant.
Because of the competitive nature of resources, many people from your ethnic group wouldn’t hesitate to betray you if it served their interests.
So, for those who think ethnic heritage is what matters most, they’re missing the point.
In a world driven by competition, ethnic loyalty holds little weight.
As long as your world view is directed by a "scarcity of resources" you will only see and experience a scarcity in life.
The moment you choose to see Abundance in all you do will be the moment Abundance enters your life.
I highly recommend "Think and Grow Rich" by Napolean Hill for anyone feeling scarcity in life.
"Rich" isn't just about money. We can have richness in our relationships, richness in our experiences, and richness in our accomplishments. We can have richness in all we do.
This book will change the life for those open minded to learn its secrets. One must have a Desire to learn and put into practice it's secrets, but people of ALL ethnicities, backgrounds, and circumstances have used its secrets for massive success.
Some will make excuses and have "reasons" it won't work form them.
But as a mentor said to me just yesterday.
I have read Think and Grow Rich.
So I understand where you're coming from with the idea of a mindset of abundance versus scarcity, and I agree that our mindset can significantly impact how we approach challenges in life. Books like Think and Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill have inspired many people to adopt a more positive outlook and to take actionable steps toward their goals, which is undeniably valuable.
That said, it's important to recognize that while mindset plays a crucial role, it's not the only factor in achieving success. External realities, access to resources, and economic conditions, also influence outcomes. It’s not always as simple as changing one's mindset and manifesting abundance. Many people face significant obstacles—whether they be social, economic, or environmental—that require more than just positive thinking to overcome.
I think there’s value in balancing both perspectives. Yes, adopting an abundance mindset can lead to personal growth and open doors to new opportunities. But it’s also essential to acknowledge that people come from different circumstances, and those challenges can’t always be dismissed with mindset alone. It’s a matter of both: empowering individuals to think abundantly while also addressing the real-world barriers that might limit their opportunities.
As for the idea that you can’t have both excuses and results—I get the sentiment behind it. However, sometimes what looks like an excuse may be a legitimate barrier that someone needs help navigating. The key is figuring out how to overcome those barriers while staying open to the possibilities of growth and abundance.
Ultimately, it’s about finding that middle ground where mindset and reality meet, and using both to make meaningful progress.
Thank you for your thoughtful response.
Let me ask you something.
How many black people do you have real bonds with? That you spend time together doing things?
Gavin Newsom is a tribalist of the NWO. The NWO wants complete domination of the world. Those within the NWO have given up their ethnic tribalism to NWO tribalism. A world driven by competition is a world of the NWO. Think outside the NWO box.
I get what you're saying about the NWO and the idea of domination, but competition isn't solely an invention of the NWO.
It's a natural outcome of the physical world we live in. Our 3D existence, constrained by time and space, makes competition inevitable.
There are limited resources, and that scarcity pushes individuals and groups to compete—whether for food, land, or opportunities.
Even if the NWO exists and promotes a specific agenda, competition itself isn't something you can just "think outside of."
It's a fundamental aspect of life because of the finite nature of our world. Sure, we can reduce destructive competition by promoting cooperation and fairness, but we can't escape the basic reality that limited resources drive competition.
In a hypothetical world where we existed outside of space and time, maybe competition wouldn't be necessary. But in the real world we inhabit, competition has always been present, long before any modern power structures like the NWO.
So, it's less about thinking "outside the NWO box" and more about understanding how competition naturally arises from the constraints we live under, and then figuring out how to balance it with collaboration and shared goals for a better society.
If you want a simple example of natural competition, just look at an expressway.
As more people get on the road, the available space becomes limited.
Since there’s only so much physical room in each lane, drivers naturally begin competing for space.
This leads to frustration and tension, which is why road rage can happen.
This is a perfect example of how natural competition arises in our 3D world.
The scarcity of physical space on the road creates competition, and it’s not something orchestrated—it happens organically due to the limitations of our environment.